SCM and minister of justice seek resignation of Iulian Muntean

The members of the Superior Council of Magistracy (SCM) call on their mate Iulian Muntean, who was recently appointed by Parliament, to resign as Council member for the reason that he didn’t inform about the fact that he is investigated in a criminal case started over acts of corruption. Minister of Justice Veronica Mihailov-Moraru made a similar request, IPN reports.

On September 20, the press reported that SCM member Iulian Muntean is investigated for passive corruption. He doesn’t deny the fact that he was accused in a criminal case started in 2018. Apparently, he didn’t inform the pre-vetting commission of this and didn’t present evidence showing that he attempted to find out at what stage the case is now. The SCM members said that as the whole society, they didn’t know about this until September 20.

The SCM expressed its concern about such developments, noting that it is inacceptable for a member of the Council to avoid the extraordinary assessment with its clear and rigorous requirements. As Iulian Muntean didn’t provide credible explanations about the circumstances that made him not inform about the fact that he is investigated in a criminal case, the Council believes the optimal solution is for this to resign.

For her part, Minister of Justice Veronica Mihailov-Moraru said she welcomes the fact that parliamentary hearings will be held on the issue to clarify all the circumstances and to take the appropriate measures. It is yet definite that if a SCM member didn’t inform the pre-vetting commission about his investigation in a case of corruption, his integrity is questionable. So as not to discredit the image and efforts made to do the justice sector reform on the whole, he should resign.

Following the press reports, Iulian Muntean said the so-called criminal case was fabricated by order of the regime of Plahotniuc as an intimidation method. This case wasn’t indicated in any of the databases managed by the state institutions or the pre-vetting commission would have learned about it. “After the elections of February 2019, there has been no information about this case. As far as I know, no case (person) of the 80 was sent to court, not to mention a conviction,” stated Iulian Muntean.

On September 7, Iulian Muntean was named member of the Superior Council of Magistracy from among non-judges by Parliament. He is a lawyer and earlier taught at a number of universities in Moldova.



The City Hall of Chisinau is organizing the festival “Te salut, Chisinau!”, on the occasion of the 590th anniversary of the city’s first documentary attestation (July 17-19) /Pedestrian Street “Eugen Doga” /at 06:00 PM/.

The municipal chess and checkers championship for seniors is taking place in the sectors of the capital /July 18-19/.

The City Hall of Chisinau is organizing fairs and markets with local products and goods in the sectors of the capital /18-19 July/.

0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail


SCM and minister of justice seek resignation of Iulian Muntean

The members of the Superior Council of Magistracy (SCM) call on their mate Iulian Muntean, who was recently appointed by Parliament, to resign as Council member for the reason that he didn’t inform about the fact that he is investigated in a criminal case started over acts of corruption. Minister of Justice Veronica Mihailov-Moraru made a similar request, IPN reports.

On September 20, the press reported that SCM member Iulian Muntean is investigated for passive corruption. He doesn’t deny the fact that he was accused in a criminal case started in 2018. Apparently, he didn’t inform the pre-vetting commission of this and didn’t present evidence showing that he attempted to find out at what stage the case is now. The SCM members said that as the whole society, they didn’t know about this until September 20.

The SCM expressed its concern about such developments, noting that it is inacceptable for a member of the Council to avoid the extraordinary assessment with its clear and rigorous requirements. As Iulian Muntean didn’t provide credible explanations about the circumstances that made him not inform about the fact that he is investigated in a criminal case, the Council believes the optimal solution is for this to resign.

For her part, Minister of Justice Veronica Mihailov-Moraru said she welcomes the fact that parliamentary hearings will be held on the issue to clarify all the circumstances and to take the appropriate measures. It is yet definite that if a SCM member didn’t inform the pre-vetting commission about his investigation in a case of corruption, his integrity is questionable. So as not to discredit the image and efforts made to do the justice sector reform on the whole, he should resign.

Following the press reports, Iulian Muntean said the so-called criminal case was fabricated by order of the regime of Plahotniuc as an intimidation method. This case wasn’t indicated in any of the databases managed by the state institutions or the pre-vetting commission would have learned about it. “After the elections of February 2019, there has been no information about this case. As far as I know, no case (person) of the 80 was sent to court, not to mention a conviction,” stated Iulian Muntean.

On September 7, Iulian Muntean was named member of the Superior Council of Magistracy from among non-judges by Parliament. He is a lawyer and earlier taught at a number of universities in Moldova.


The former president of the Constitutional Court, Alexandru Tanase, stated that the changes regarding the competences of the Gagauz autonomy in organizing elections do not represent an infringement on its status. “Gagauzia does not have enemies in Moldova,” Tănase declared in the show “Teritoria Svobodi” with Lilia Burakovski, reports IPN.

Alexandru Tanase also stated that Comrat is being “brazenly manipulated”. “I am very sorry that, after 30 years, other political parties are not normally represented there, and pro-Moscow oriented politicians control the situation in the autonomy”, clarified the former president of the Constitutional Court.

In his opinion, this is a backlog of Chisinau, for which the country will pay a high price due to the ignorance of the situation in the region.

He mentioned that, most likely, legislative changes will be made, according to which Chisinau will designate the electoral bodies itself that will organize the elections in Gagauzia – on the date set by the Popular Assembly.

“Gagauzia has no enemy in the Republic of Moldova. There is no politician – not even the most marginal – who would say that autonomy should be abolished or that certain competencies should be reduced,” concluded the former president of the Constitutional Court.

0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail




1 IANUARIE, 2025
1 IANUARIE, 2025