Dan Perciun on the history textbook: Antonescu was a war criminal responsible for the Holocaust in Bessarabia

Minister of Education and Research Dan Perciun said there was no doubt about Ion Antonescu’s responsibility for the Holocaust in Bessarabia. At the same time, the minister acknowledged that certain passages in the new textbook, “History of the Romanians and World History,” could have been worded more clearly. He made the remarks on the programme “Teritoria Svobodi,” hosted by Lilia Burakovski, IPN reports.

“There is no doubt that Antonescu was a war criminal. He took part in the Holocaust in Bessarabia and bears direct responsibility for it,” Dan Perciun emphasized.

The minister acknowledged that some of the criticisms of the textbook’s content, particularly those concerning its presentation of historical events in the 20th century, were justified. “We agree that certain passages in this textbook could have been worded more clearly and explicitly,” he said.

According to Perciun, the Ministry of Education and Research has already developed a supplementary teaching resource of approximately 100 pages devoted entirely to the Holocaust. It includes detailed information, statistical data, and explanations of the historical events. The supplementary materials have been distributed to all teachers in both Romanian and Russian.

“We published a 100-page supplement to the textbook devoted exclusively to the Holocaust, with detailed explanations and comprehensive statistical data. We made it available to all teachers in both Romanian and Russian,” the minister said.

The Ministry of Education and Research is currently updating the school curriculum. Representatives of the Jewish community have been invited to share their views on its content, including the chapters devoted to the Holocaust.

Dan Perciun assured the Jewish community that its proposals would be taken into account when the next history textbook is developed. “We have asked representatives of the Jewish community to share their views on the new curriculum, particularly regarding Holocaust education. We will take their proposals into account and hope that the next textbook will raise fewer questions,” the minister said.

The Ministry of Education and Research thus acknowledges the need to clarify certain passages in the current textbook and intends to take the Jewish community’s comments into account when updating the content of the school history curriculum.



The November 15 elections to the People’s Assembly and for the post of Bashkan of Gagauzia should be treated as regional elections and held in accordance with the national electoral framework, under the supervision of the Central Electoral Commission. Historian Oleg Bercu expressed this view during the public debate “Historical Roots in the Present and Future of the Gagauz People,” organized by the IPN News Agency.

According to the historian, applying different electoral rules within the same country can make it difficult to ensure fair elections. He explained that elections in the Republic of Moldova must be conducted under a common set of rules established by national law. In his view, responsibility for administering elections in the autonomous region should lie with the central electoral authority, while the electoral body in Comrat should work in coordination with the Central Electoral Commission (CEC).

“We cannot have the rule of law when a different electoral law applies in certain parts of the Republic of Moldova. Under the Constitution and the Electoral Code, the Central Electoral Commission is the sole authority responsible for electoral processes nationwide. Accordingly, the electoral authority in Comrat must be subordinate to Chișinău, and elections in the autonomous region must be treated as regional elections,” explained Oleg Bercu, who holds a doctorate in history and is the author of the monograph “The Sociopolitical Evolution of the Gagauz Population from the Mid-Nineteenth to the Late Twentieth Century.”

The historian also explained the role of electoral oversight in preventing irregularities and increasing transparency in elections. He said the involvement of the Central Electoral Commission (CEC) would enable closer monitoring of the electoral process and reduce the risk of fraud. His remarks came after Moldova’s Parliament amended the electoral legislation and the CEC officially assumed responsibility for organizing elections in the region.

“Electoral processes must be overseen by the Central Electoral Commission (CEC), which will ensure that the law is applied consistently nationwide. This will also allow for closer oversight, reducing the risk of electoral fraud. There have been attempts to rig elections in the autonomous region in some cases. In a state governed by the rule of law, the law must prevail,” historian Oleg Bercu added.

The public debate “Historical Roots in the Present and Future of the Gagauz People” is the 66th event in the series “The Impact of the Past on Confidence-Building and Peacebuilding Processes”. The IPN News Agency organises this debate series with the support of Germany’s Hanns Seidel Foundation.


0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail


Dan Perciun on the history textbook: Antonescu was a war criminal responsible for the Holocaust in Bessarabia

Minister of Education and Research Dan Perciun said there was no doubt about Ion Antonescu’s responsibility for the Holocaust in Bessarabia. At the same time, the minister acknowledged that certain passages in the new textbook, “History of the Romanians and World History,” could have been worded more clearly. He made the remarks on the programme “Teritoria Svobodi,” hosted by Lilia Burakovski, IPN reports.

“There is no doubt that Antonescu was a war criminal. He took part in the Holocaust in Bessarabia and bears direct responsibility for it,” Dan Perciun emphasized.

The minister acknowledged that some of the criticisms of the textbook’s content, particularly those concerning its presentation of historical events in the 20th century, were justified. “We agree that certain passages in this textbook could have been worded more clearly and explicitly,” he said.

According to Perciun, the Ministry of Education and Research has already developed a supplementary teaching resource of approximately 100 pages devoted entirely to the Holocaust. It includes detailed information, statistical data, and explanations of the historical events. The supplementary materials have been distributed to all teachers in both Romanian and Russian.

“We published a 100-page supplement to the textbook devoted exclusively to the Holocaust, with detailed explanations and comprehensive statistical data. We made it available to all teachers in both Romanian and Russian,” the minister said.

The Ministry of Education and Research is currently updating the school curriculum. Representatives of the Jewish community have been invited to share their views on its content, including the chapters devoted to the Holocaust.

Dan Perciun assured the Jewish community that its proposals would be taken into account when the next history textbook is developed. “We have asked representatives of the Jewish community to share their views on the new curriculum, particularly regarding Holocaust education. We will take their proposals into account and hope that the next textbook will raise fewer questions,” the minister said.

The Ministry of Education and Research thus acknowledges the need to clarify certain passages in the current textbook and intends to take the Jewish community’s comments into account when updating the content of the school history curriculum.


The legal status of Gagauzia, the implementation of language legislation, and the historical origins of the Gagauz people were the main topics discussed during the public debate “Historical Roots in the Present and Future of the Gagauz People,” organized by the IPN News Agency. Participants highlighted both the historical development of the Gagauz community and the distinctive features of the legal and institutional framework governing the region, against the backdrop of upcoming elections to the People’s Assembly and for the post of governor of the Autonomous Territorial Unit of Gagauzia.

At the start of the debate, expert Igor Botan outlined the responsibilities of Gagauzia’s main institutions. “Under the Law on the Special Legal Status of Gagauzia, the People’s Assembly is Gagauzia’s representative body, directly elected by the region’s residents and empowered to adopt legislation within its remit. Under the same law, the governor (Bashkan) is Gagauzia’s highest-ranking official and head of the region’s executive branch. All public administration authorities in Gagauzia are subordinate to the governor,” explained the project’s resident expert.

For his part, historian Oleg Bercu, who holds a doctorate in history, referred to the constitutional and legal framework governing Gagauz autonomy, established in 1994. According to Bercu, one of the problems that has emerged over time is the failure to fully uphold the status of the Romanian language in the region’s public institutions.

“In 1994, lawmakers decided to establish the autonomous territorial unit of Gagauzia. The Constitution of the Republic of Moldova itself stipulates that Gagauzia is an integral part of the country. Under the law, the languages used in Gagauzia are Gagauz, Romanian and Russian. In my view, the situation went off track, and the Republic of Moldova failed to ensure that public authorities in Gagauzia respected the status of the state language,” explained Oleg Bercu, author of the monograph “The Socio-Political Evolution of the Gagauz Population from the Mid-Nineteenth to the Late Twentieth Century.”

Discussing the identity of the Gagauz people, historian Ștefan Bejan explained that their resettlement in the Budjak region was tied to the interests of the Russian Empire. The imperial authorities sought to populate the territory with communities they regarded as loyal.

“There is no broad consensus on the origins of the Gagauz people. The most widely accepted theory, however, is that they emerged from a mingling of several Turkic peoples who settled in southern Dobruja and, under Byzantine influence, converted to Christianity and embraced Christian values. In 1812, the Russian Empire needed a loyal population to settle in Budjak, farm the land, and supply the army with everything it needed for future campaigns,” explained historian Ștefan Bejan, author of the monograph “The Gagauz: Origins, Development, and Settlement in Southern Bessarabia.”

The public debate “Historical Roots in the Present and Future of the Gagauz People” is the 66th in the series “The Impact of the Past on Trust-Building and Peacebuilding Processes.” The IPN News Agency organizes this debate series with the support of Germany’s Hanns Seidel Foundation.


0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail




1 IANUARIE, 2025
1 IANUARIE, 2025