Both the prosecutors and the defense are challenging the verdict in the case of Vlad Plahotniuc

The Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office has appealed the sentence in the case of Vlad Plahotniuc, who was initially sentenced to 19 years in prison, considering the punishment too lenient. The defense of the former democratic leader also attacked the decision at the Court of Appeal, qualifying it as illegal, reports IPN.

The prosecutors request that the sentence be increased to 25 years in prison, as initially requested. “The prosecution requests the partial annulment of the sentence, the retrial of the case, and the application of a 25-year prison sentence”, is stated in a press release from the prosecution.

According to the prosecutors, the court confirmed the defendant’s guilt based on clear evidence and established that the acts were committed intentionally, within a criminal organization. His decisive role was also demonstrated, including in the organization and leadership of criminal activities. However, the prosecutors argue that the sentence applied does not reflect the severity of the acts.

At the same time, the prosecution challenges the court’s refusal to order the confiscation of amounts of 39.2 million dollars and 3.5 million euros, specifying that the recovery of damages and special confiscation are different measures, with distinct purposes, which can be applied concurrently.

However, the defense argues that the decision of the first instance is not based on solid evidence. Lawyer Lucian Rogac told IPN that the sentence was appealed to the Court of Appeal.

In a public post on social media, Vlad Plahotniuc stated that the judges’ decision was “politically motivated”. According to him, the trial was marred by serious procedural irregularities and political interference.

Vlad Plahotniuc was sentenced to 19 years in prison in the “Bank Fraud” case. The decision was handed down on April 22 by judges at the Chisinau District Court, Buiucani Branch, through the aggregation of sentences. He was not present at the sentencing hearing.



The designated Prime Minister, Vasile Tofan, will request the Parliament’s vote of confidence for the cabinet of ministers and the government program today. The plenary session in which the deputies will examine the request is scheduled for 11:00 AM, reports IPN.

In accordance with the legislation, the Parliament gives the vote of confidence to the Government with the vote of the majority of elected deputies. Based on the vote of confidence granted by the Parliament, the President of the Republic of Moldova appoints the Government.

In the Government proposed by the designated Prime Minister Vasile Tofan, ten ministers from the current executive will be found, and four portfolios will go to new members of the cabinet. At the same time, the deputy prime ministers for reintegration and for European integration, Valeriu Chiveri and Cristina Gherasimov, will retain their positions.

Alexandru Gasnaș, presidential advisor, is designated for the position of Minister of Health. Radu Musteața, the director of the National Agency for Food Safety, is proposed for the leadership of the Ministry of Agriculture and Food Industry, while Victoria Belous, PAS deputy, who previously held the same portfolio, is put forward for the position of Minister of Finance. Dan Suruceanu, the current vice-administrator of the multimedia and sports complex Chisinau Arena, is proposed for the leadership of the Ministry of Culture.

Vasile Tofan has been appointed as the prime ministerial candidate by President Maia Sandu, at the proposal of the Action and Solidarity Party, following the resignation of Alexandru Munteanu.

0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail


Both the prosecutors and the defense are challenging the verdict in the case of Vlad Plahotniuc

The Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office has appealed the sentence in the case of Vlad Plahotniuc, who was initially sentenced to 19 years in prison, considering the punishment too lenient. The defense of the former democratic leader also attacked the decision at the Court of Appeal, qualifying it as illegal, reports IPN.

The prosecutors request that the sentence be increased to 25 years in prison, as initially requested. “The prosecution requests the partial annulment of the sentence, the retrial of the case, and the application of a 25-year prison sentence”, is stated in a press release from the prosecution.

According to the prosecutors, the court confirmed the defendant’s guilt based on clear evidence and established that the acts were committed intentionally, within a criminal organization. His decisive role was also demonstrated, including in the organization and leadership of criminal activities. However, the prosecutors argue that the sentence applied does not reflect the severity of the acts.

At the same time, the prosecution challenges the court’s refusal to order the confiscation of amounts of 39.2 million dollars and 3.5 million euros, specifying that the recovery of damages and special confiscation are different measures, with distinct purposes, which can be applied concurrently.

However, the defense argues that the decision of the first instance is not based on solid evidence. Lawyer Lucian Rogac told IPN that the sentence was appealed to the Court of Appeal.

In a public post on social media, Vlad Plahotniuc stated that the judges’ decision was “politically motivated”. According to him, the trial was marred by serious procedural irregularities and political interference.

Vlad Plahotniuc was sentenced to 19 years in prison in the “Bank Fraud” case. The decision was handed down on April 22 by judges at the Chisinau District Court, Buiucani Branch, through the aggregation of sentences. He was not present at the sentencing hearing.


The European Union has fined the online marketplace AliExpress 550 million euros for a serious violation of the Digital Services Act. The decision was made because the platform did not take sufficient measures to prevent the sale of unsafe and counterfeit products, according to IPN.

The fine is the latest development in the formal proceedings launched in 2024 regarding a possible violation of the EU Digital Services Act. The European Commission stated that AliExpress had failed to implement an effective system for identifying and removing illegal products and had underestimated the resources needed for content moderation.

According to the European Commission, the mechanisms for verifying product compliance could be easily circumvented, with unscrupulous sellers misclassifying products to avoid stricter requirements. European authorities also argue that the platform does not have enough staff to verify suspicious products.

At the same time, the European Commission found that a large number of illegal products, including unsafe toys and hazardous cosmetics, continued to be sold through AliExpress. In some cases, these products remained available on the platform for weeks after being reported. Furthermore, the Commission found that AliExpress had not properly enforced its own penalty policy and had allegedly allowed sellers of illegal products to remain active even after they had been penalized.

AliExpress now has until October 20 to submit an action plan outlining how it will address the issues raised by the European Commission. The Commission will then decide, within two months of receiving the plan, whether additional measures are necessary.

The sanction comes after the EU introduced a three-euro fee in early July for packages valued at up to 150 euros originating from outside the EU. The measure could significantly impact the business models of the Chinese e-commerce platforms AliExpress, Temu, and Shein.

0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail




1 IANUARIE, 2025
1 IANUARIE, 2025