Irina Korobchenko: There is a big difference between acid electoral speech and hate speech

The candidates or electoral contenders will not be penalized for what they believe and say in the public sphere as long as what is stated does not violate the right of another person or a group of persons, Irina Korobchenko, hate speech monitoring and combating expert at Promo-LEX Association, stated in a public debate hosted by IPN.

The expert said that there shouldn’t be any concerns about the eventual violation of the freedom of expression. “There is a big difference between acid electoral speech, between contenders who shock sometimes, and hate speech used by an election contestant to urge other citizens, potential voters to violate the rights of another group only because that group is different. We speak namely about this type of speech and namely this type of speech should be penalized as the freedom of expression doesn’t cover speech that fuels, promotes the violation of the rights of other persons, no matter who these persons are and according to what protected criteria they can be identified,” stated Irina Korobchenko.

She expressed her confidence that the General Police Inspectorate, which is the ascertaining agent, is ready to make a difference between the freedom of expression and hate speech.

“Hate speech in the national legislation until 2022 could have been penalized only based on the Audiovisual Code by the Audiovisual Council, if this was generated by media service providers. The Council for Equality penalized the forms of expression that incited hatred through the angle of Law No. 121 on the instigation of discrimination. So, we didn’t have a clear provision in the legislation to prohibit and penalize hate speech, as it happens in this case,” said the expert of Promo-LEX.

Irina Korobchenko recommended the election contenders to refrain from speech that incites hatred, to immediately notify the responsible authorities if they become the target of such speech and to avoid hate speech in social media. If hate speech is followed by violent actions, one should call the 112 Emergency Service.

The public debate entitled “Hate speech prohibited and penalized, novelty at November 5 elections” was staged by IPN News Agency in the framework of the project “Stimulation of mass media discussion about traditional particularities of local elections and the need for Europeanization” which is supported by Soros Foundation Moldova.



Official documents issued in the Republic of Moldova and Germany may now be used in each other’s countries with only an apostille, without the need for the legalization procedure. The measure enters into force following the Federal Republic of Germany’s withdrawal of the reservation it made in 2007 when the Republic of Moldova acceded to the Hague Apostille Convention, IPN reports.

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs states that the decision was made following steps taken by Deputy Prime Minister Mihai Popsoi, Minister of Foreign Affairs, during his May 18–19 meeting with his German counterpart, Johann David Wadephul.

The ministry emphasizes that the new system will eliminate the need to visit multiple institutions or diplomatic missions to have documents legalized, which will reduce both the time required and the costs incurred by citizens. The simplified procedure will apply to official documents such as birth, marriage, divorce, and death certificates, criminal records, academic diplomas, and diploma supplements.

The Hague Convention on the Apostille entered into force for the Republic of Moldova on March 16, 2007. With its implementation in relations with Germany, the Republic of Moldova will benefit from the same simplified procedure for the recognition of official documents as it does with all 130 states and entities that are parties to the convention.

0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail


Irina Korobchenko: There is a big difference between acid electoral speech and hate speech

The candidates or electoral contenders will not be penalized for what they believe and say in the public sphere as long as what is stated does not violate the right of another person or a group of persons, Irina Korobchenko, hate speech monitoring and combating expert at Promo-LEX Association, stated in a public debate hosted by IPN.

The expert said that there shouldn’t be any concerns about the eventual violation of the freedom of expression. “There is a big difference between acid electoral speech, between contenders who shock sometimes, and hate speech used by an election contestant to urge other citizens, potential voters to violate the rights of another group only because that group is different. We speak namely about this type of speech and namely this type of speech should be penalized as the freedom of expression doesn’t cover speech that fuels, promotes the violation of the rights of other persons, no matter who these persons are and according to what protected criteria they can be identified,” stated Irina Korobchenko.

She expressed her confidence that the General Police Inspectorate, which is the ascertaining agent, is ready to make a difference between the freedom of expression and hate speech.

“Hate speech in the national legislation until 2022 could have been penalized only based on the Audiovisual Code by the Audiovisual Council, if this was generated by media service providers. The Council for Equality penalized the forms of expression that incited hatred through the angle of Law No. 121 on the instigation of discrimination. So, we didn’t have a clear provision in the legislation to prohibit and penalize hate speech, as it happens in this case,” said the expert of Promo-LEX.

Irina Korobchenko recommended the election contenders to refrain from speech that incites hatred, to immediately notify the responsible authorities if they become the target of such speech and to avoid hate speech in social media. If hate speech is followed by violent actions, one should call the 112 Emergency Service.

The public debate entitled “Hate speech prohibited and penalized, novelty at November 5 elections” was staged by IPN News Agency in the framework of the project “Stimulation of mass media discussion about traditional particularities of local elections and the need for Europeanization” which is supported by Soros Foundation Moldova.


Maritime schools could be opened in Moldova following the full transposition of relevant European legislation. The statement was made by Deputy Prime Minister Vladimir Bolea, Minister of Infrastructure and Regional Development, who noted that there is growing interest in such programs, including from Ukrainian citizens affected by the war, according to IPN.

Vladimir Bolea stated that the new regulations will allow seaman’s books to be issued based on studies completed in the Republic of Moldova at authorized institutions.

The minister told the press that, at present, no ships are sailing under the flag of the Republic of Moldova, but the authorities are working to transpose European legislation and develop the legal framework necessary for the development of this sector.

According to him, the state and the Naval Agency could generate significant revenue both from ships sailing under the Moldovan flag and from institutions that train seafarers.

0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail




1 IANUARIE, 2025
1 IANUARIE, 2025