Invitro Diagnostics rejects Tudor Ceaicovschi’s accusations

Invitro Diagnostics rejects the accusations formulated by Tudor Ceaicovschi and his lawyer in a press conference on Thursday, calling them “false”. At the same time, the lawyer of the Invitro Diagnostics company, Tudor Buzdugan, told IPN that the company does not undergo insolvency, as according to the court’s decision, the company is in the observation period.

In a statement, Invitro Diagnostics recalled that the company was incorporated on May 21, 2014. In 2016, Tudor Ceaicovschi was invited by other partners as an associate. He claimed to have extensive expertise in medicine and promised to deliver medical equipment with a markup not exceeding 5%. On June 22, 2016, the founders of Invitro Diagnostics SRL became Alexandru Ceaicovschi (son of Tudor Ceaicovschi.), holder of the 33.33% share, and two other persons with equal shares of 33.33%. The appointed administrators were Marin Bălănuță and Tudor Ceaicovschi. On May 18, 2018, an associate sold their share, with Alexandru Ceaicovschi and the other associate coming to hold 50% each. As a result, the associates to invest, and the assets increased from 8.9 million lei in the first year to 87.5 million lei in 2022.

Regarding the accusations of tax fraud, the Invitro Diagnostics administration categorically rejects them and declares that it is a transparent company, included in the list of large taxpayers (with taxes paid over 40 million lei annually) and believes that the state authorities monitor the activity the company, being open for any verification. Invitro Diagnostics strongly denies the claim that it has used unauthorized tests/reagents in laboratory investigations.

“After the pandemic period, the administration and associates of SRL Invitro Diagnostics discovered that Tudor Ceaicovschi, through his companies, supplied medical equipment and consumables to SRL Invitro Diagnostics at prices inflated by approximately 500%, and the agreement concluded with the associates was violated. For this reason, it was decided to diversify the list of suppliers, which displeased Mr. Tudor Ceaicovschi. Only after an internal investigation was it found that Tudor Ceaicovschi, through SRL GBG-MLD, during the pandemic, abusing the dominant position on the market and the control exercised over SRL Invitro Diagnostics, delivered to it tests for the SARS virus -CoV-2/SARSCoV at prices 5 times higher than at other organizations. In particular, while other organizations received the tests at a price of 39 lei apiece, SRL Invitro Diagnostics bought them at a price of 136 lei. The money unjustifiably collected from SRL Invitro Diagnostics went directly to the companies of the Ceaicovschi family”, the company’s statement says.

In connection with this, Invitro Diagnostics has sued GBG-MLD for “unjustified enrichment”. The case is being examined by the Chisinau/Centru Court. As a result, the court has frozen 17.7 million lei of GBG-MLD’s assets.

Invitro Diagnostics also states that on September 1, 2023, it received a prior notification regarding the filing of the insolvency procedure, with GBG-MLD claiming 18.6 million lei. GBG-MLD, led by Tudor Ceaicovschi, filed several preliminary requests in court for the initiation of the insolvency process against Invitro Diagnostics. On September 8, by the conclusion of the Chisinau/Centru Court, the preliminary complaint was admitted for examination, with the appointment of a provisional administrator and the establishment of the observation period, with the matter to be heard in court on October 18, 2023

“The admission for examination of the introductory application and the establishment of the observation period in relation to SRL Invitro Diagnostics does not mean that the business is bankrupt; the financial diagnosis shows that the company’s liquidity and solvency indicators are above the limit recommended by law”, says the company.

“The statements made by Tudor Ceaicovschi in the press conference of October 4, 2023 constitute his strategy against the legal proceedings initiated against him for the fraudulent acts committed against SRL Invitro Diagnostics. After learning about Tudor Ceaicovschi’s fraud, SRL Invitro Diagnostics no longer purchases medical equipment and consumables from him in that volume. Tudor Ceaicovschi unfairly accuses the representatives of SRL Invitro Diagnostics with the purpose of being readmitted to the list of suppliers, this being a form of blackmail”, the press statements said.



The National Anticorruption Center is conducting searches at the state enterprise Moldatsa. The CNA spokesperson, Ina Volosciuc, clarified for IPN that the raids are taking place within the framework of a criminal case regarding alleged acts of corruption and abuse of office.

This is not the first time that the CNA has descended on Moldatsa. Previously, anti-corruption officers conducted searches in a criminal case initiated based on reasonable suspicions of abuse of office under aggravating circumstances.

The scandal at Moldatsa erupted after the emergence of information regarding the granting of salaries and incentives considered unjustified, as well as suspicions about the legality of some documents presented by the former director Dumitru Vangheli at the competition for the position. As a result of the scandal, he was dismissed.

At the same time, PAS deputy Radu Marian resigned from his position as chairman of the parliamentary committee on economy, budget and finance, assuming responsibility for recommending Dumitru Vangheli for the leadership of Moldatsa, and the director of the Public Property Agency, Roman Cojuhari, resigned, citing the responsibility of the APP to monitor the activity of the enterprise.

0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail


Invitro Diagnostics rejects Tudor Ceaicovschi’s accusations

Invitro Diagnostics rejects the accusations formulated by Tudor Ceaicovschi and his lawyer in a press conference on Thursday, calling them “false”. At the same time, the lawyer of the Invitro Diagnostics company, Tudor Buzdugan, told IPN that the company does not undergo insolvency, as according to the court’s decision, the company is in the observation period.

In a statement, Invitro Diagnostics recalled that the company was incorporated on May 21, 2014. In 2016, Tudor Ceaicovschi was invited by other partners as an associate. He claimed to have extensive expertise in medicine and promised to deliver medical equipment with a markup not exceeding 5%. On June 22, 2016, the founders of Invitro Diagnostics SRL became Alexandru Ceaicovschi (son of Tudor Ceaicovschi.), holder of the 33.33% share, and two other persons with equal shares of 33.33%. The appointed administrators were Marin Bălănuță and Tudor Ceaicovschi. On May 18, 2018, an associate sold their share, with Alexandru Ceaicovschi and the other associate coming to hold 50% each. As a result, the associates to invest, and the assets increased from 8.9 million lei in the first year to 87.5 million lei in 2022.

Regarding the accusations of tax fraud, the Invitro Diagnostics administration categorically rejects them and declares that it is a transparent company, included in the list of large taxpayers (with taxes paid over 40 million lei annually) and believes that the state authorities monitor the activity the company, being open for any verification. Invitro Diagnostics strongly denies the claim that it has used unauthorized tests/reagents in laboratory investigations.

“After the pandemic period, the administration and associates of SRL Invitro Diagnostics discovered that Tudor Ceaicovschi, through his companies, supplied medical equipment and consumables to SRL Invitro Diagnostics at prices inflated by approximately 500%, and the agreement concluded with the associates was violated. For this reason, it was decided to diversify the list of suppliers, which displeased Mr. Tudor Ceaicovschi. Only after an internal investigation was it found that Tudor Ceaicovschi, through SRL GBG-MLD, during the pandemic, abusing the dominant position on the market and the control exercised over SRL Invitro Diagnostics, delivered to it tests for the SARS virus -CoV-2/SARSCoV at prices 5 times higher than at other organizations. In particular, while other organizations received the tests at a price of 39 lei apiece, SRL Invitro Diagnostics bought them at a price of 136 lei. The money unjustifiably collected from SRL Invitro Diagnostics went directly to the companies of the Ceaicovschi family”, the company’s statement says.

In connection with this, Invitro Diagnostics has sued GBG-MLD for “unjustified enrichment”. The case is being examined by the Chisinau/Centru Court. As a result, the court has frozen 17.7 million lei of GBG-MLD’s assets.

Invitro Diagnostics also states that on September 1, 2023, it received a prior notification regarding the filing of the insolvency procedure, with GBG-MLD claiming 18.6 million lei. GBG-MLD, led by Tudor Ceaicovschi, filed several preliminary requests in court for the initiation of the insolvency process against Invitro Diagnostics. On September 8, by the conclusion of the Chisinau/Centru Court, the preliminary complaint was admitted for examination, with the appointment of a provisional administrator and the establishment of the observation period, with the matter to be heard in court on October 18, 2023

“The admission for examination of the introductory application and the establishment of the observation period in relation to SRL Invitro Diagnostics does not mean that the business is bankrupt; the financial diagnosis shows that the company’s liquidity and solvency indicators are above the limit recommended by law”, says the company.

“The statements made by Tudor Ceaicovschi in the press conference of October 4, 2023 constitute his strategy against the legal proceedings initiated against him for the fraudulent acts committed against SRL Invitro Diagnostics. After learning about Tudor Ceaicovschi’s fraud, SRL Invitro Diagnostics no longer purchases medical equipment and consumables from him in that volume. Tudor Ceaicovschi unfairly accuses the representatives of SRL Invitro Diagnostics with the purpose of being readmitted to the list of suppliers, this being a form of blackmail”, the press statements said.


The decision by the Central Court of Appeals to dissolve the four political parties is based on a legal mechanism introduced after the “Sor” Party was declared unconstitutional in 2023. Polina Panainte, deputy director of ADEPT and secretary of the Civic Coalition for Free and Fair Elections, explained to IPN that this mechanism aims to prevent a party declared unconstitutional from continuing its activities under a different name.

The expert argues that this mechanism is not a law enacted against specific parties, but rather a generally applicable instrument introduced into the Law on Political Parties.

“The succession mechanism was created precisely to prevent a party that has been declared unconstitutional from reemerging under a different legal form”, Polina Panainte explained.

According to her, the Venice Commission did not examine any specific party, nor did it examine the case of the “Sor” Party, but it did state that restricting the activities of a political party can be justified only in exceptional circumstances, provided that clear safeguards are in place and the necessity of such a measure is demonstrated.

Polina Panainte emphasized that the dissolution of a successor party cannot be ordered automatically, but requires a case-by-case analysis and concrete evidence of the existence of a political succession.

In this case, the Court of Appeals examined the criteria set forth by law for establishing such a connection. Among the factors considered by the court was the congress held in Moscow on July 6, 2025, where the leaders of the four political parties announced the formation of the “Victorie – Победа” political bloc, in the presence of Ilan Shor, who had been convicted in the bank fraud case.

On Wednesday, the Central Court of Appeals ordered the dissolution of the “Sansa,” “Renastere,” “Victorie,” and “Forta de Alternativa si Salvare a Moldovei” parties, finding that they are successors to the “Sor” Party, which was declared unconstitutional in 2023. For now, the court has published only the operative parts of the rulings, without the full reasoning behind them. The decisions may be appealed under the conditions provided by law.

0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail




1 IANUARIE, 2025
1 IANUARIE, 2025