Sheriff Tiraspol, good at paying: CAS partially rejects the appeal of the football club

Photo source: Sheriff Tiraspol

The Court of Arbitration for Sport has partially rejected the appeal of Sheriff Tiraspol club regarding the initial decision of FIFA, to pay compensation for the termination of the contract of the former player of the team, Luis Mateo Ortiz Lara. According to FIFA, the player terminated the contract unilaterally, but with just cause, as a result of the club’s behavior, reports IPN.

The dispute concerns the termination of the employment contract signed in January 2024 and valid until the end of 2025. The player notified FIFA after citing several breaches of contractual obligations by the club. Among the actions cited are exclusion from team activities, limited access to the club’s infrastructure, and the lack of a response to the player’s requests to continue his activity.

FIFA has obliged the Tiraspol club to pay the player 7 thousand dollars in outstanding salary and 112 thousand dollars in compensation for the termination of the contract, plus 5% interest per year starting from September 2024, until the debt is extinguished. Sheriff has contested the decision at the Court of Arbitration for Sport, invoking the existence of a mutual termination agreement.

The CAS found that there was not enough evidence that such an agreement had been signed by the player and upheld the FIFA decision, but reduced the compensation amount to $81.7 thousand, maintaining the payment of $7 thousand for the outstanding salary. The reason is related to the fact that the player had signed with another football club, including for a period already covered by the previous contract with Sheriff Tiraspol.

Defensive midfielder Luis Mateo Ortiz Lara played for Sheriff Tiraspol in the 2023-2024 season and marked 6 matches in the “wasps'” jersey, recording an assist.



The National Anticorruption Center is conducting searches at the state enterprise Moldatsa. The CNA spokesperson, Ina Volosciuc, clarified for IPN that the raids are taking place within the framework of a criminal case regarding alleged acts of corruption and abuse of office.

This is not the first time that the CNA has descended on Moldatsa. Previously, anti-corruption officers conducted searches in a criminal case initiated based on reasonable suspicions of abuse of office under aggravating circumstances.

The scandal at Moldatsa erupted after the emergence of information regarding the granting of salaries and incentives considered unjustified, as well as suspicions about the legality of some documents presented by the former director Dumitru Vangheli at the competition for the position. As a result of the scandal, he was dismissed.

At the same time, PAS deputy Radu Marian resigned from his position as chairman of the parliamentary committee on economy, budget and finance, assuming responsibility for recommending Dumitru Vangheli for the leadership of Moldatsa, and the director of the Public Property Agency, Roman Cojuhari, resigned, citing the responsibility of the APP to monitor the activity of the enterprise.

0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail


Sheriff Tiraspol, good at paying: CAS partially rejects the appeal of the football club

Photo source: Sheriff Tiraspol

The Court of Arbitration for Sport has partially rejected the appeal of Sheriff Tiraspol club regarding the initial decision of FIFA, to pay compensation for the termination of the contract of the former player of the team, Luis Mateo Ortiz Lara. According to FIFA, the player terminated the contract unilaterally, but with just cause, as a result of the club’s behavior, reports IPN.

The dispute concerns the termination of the employment contract signed in January 2024 and valid until the end of 2025. The player notified FIFA after citing several breaches of contractual obligations by the club. Among the actions cited are exclusion from team activities, limited access to the club’s infrastructure, and the lack of a response to the player’s requests to continue his activity.

FIFA has obliged the Tiraspol club to pay the player 7 thousand dollars in outstanding salary and 112 thousand dollars in compensation for the termination of the contract, plus 5% interest per year starting from September 2024, until the debt is extinguished. Sheriff has contested the decision at the Court of Arbitration for Sport, invoking the existence of a mutual termination agreement.

The CAS found that there was not enough evidence that such an agreement had been signed by the player and upheld the FIFA decision, but reduced the compensation amount to $81.7 thousand, maintaining the payment of $7 thousand for the outstanding salary. The reason is related to the fact that the player had signed with another football club, including for a period already covered by the previous contract with Sheriff Tiraspol.

Defensive midfielder Luis Mateo Ortiz Lara played for Sheriff Tiraspol in the 2023-2024 season and marked 6 matches in the “wasps'” jersey, recording an assist.


The decision by the Central Court of Appeals to dissolve the four political parties is based on a legal mechanism introduced after the “Sor” Party was declared unconstitutional in 2023. Polina Panainte, deputy director of ADEPT and secretary of the Civic Coalition for Free and Fair Elections, explained to IPN that this mechanism aims to prevent a party declared unconstitutional from continuing its activities under a different name.

The expert argues that this mechanism is not a law enacted against specific parties, but rather a generally applicable instrument introduced into the Law on Political Parties.

“The succession mechanism was created precisely to prevent a party that has been declared unconstitutional from reemerging under a different legal form”, Polina Panainte explained.

According to her, the Venice Commission did not examine any specific party, nor did it examine the case of the “Sor” Party, but it did state that restricting the activities of a political party can be justified only in exceptional circumstances, provided that clear safeguards are in place and the necessity of such a measure is demonstrated.

Polina Panainte emphasized that the dissolution of a successor party cannot be ordered automatically, but requires a case-by-case analysis and concrete evidence of the existence of a political succession.

In this case, the Court of Appeals examined the criteria set forth by law for establishing such a connection. Among the factors considered by the court was the congress held in Moscow on July 6, 2025, where the leaders of the four political parties announced the formation of the “Victorie – Победа” political bloc, in the presence of Ilan Shor, who had been convicted in the bank fraud case.

On Wednesday, the Central Court of Appeals ordered the dissolution of the “Sansa,” “Renastere,” “Victorie,” and “Forta de Alternativa si Salvare a Moldovei” parties, finding that they are successors to the “Sor” Party, which was declared unconstitutional in 2023. For now, the court has published only the operative parts of the rulings, without the full reasoning behind them. The decisions may be appealed under the conditions provided by law.

0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail




1 IANUARIE, 2025
1 IANUARIE, 2025