Igor Dodon: CC’s judgment was absolutely predictable

The leader of the Party of Socialists (PSRM) Igor Dodon said the Constitutional Court’s judgment by which President Maia Sandu’s decree to nominate Natalia Gavrilița for premiership again was declared unconstitutional was absolutely predictable. Dodon demands that Maia Sandu should immediately issue a new decree to nominate a legal candidate for Prime Minister, namely Mariana Durleșteanu, who was proposed by a legally formed parliamentary majority, IPN reports.

“I do not have any political satisfaction following the CC’s decision. Neither I, nor my colleagues from the PSRM gained something from this decision. It is not intended to ensure political satisfaction, but comes to stop the President’s departure from the Constitution after she showed that she uses again double standards and the notion of rule of law is valid for each citizen except the President, who places herself above the country’s Constitution,” Igor Dodon posted on Facebook. He warns President Maia Sandu that she lives in a parliamentary republic and does not play the decisive role and cannot annul the Parliament’s role in this state.

The PSRM issued a press release, saying that it took note of the CC’s judgment. “We call on all the political players to continue the civilized dialogue so as to identify the optimal solution and overcome the political and institutional crisis. The PSRM continues to be open to discussions and will do its best to bring the crisis to an end and will focus on real solutions expected by the people. The politicians should not sell illusions, but should propose measures for improving the people’s life,” said the party.

The Constitutional Court (CC) held that for Article 98, par. 1 of the Constitution to be obeyed, the parliamentary groups and the President of the Republic of Moldova must hold new consultations.



The salary reform in the public sector needs to be reviewed before adoption in terms of its impact on the justice system, warn experts from the Institute for European Policies and Reforms. According to them, some provisions of the project developed by the Ministry of Finance could affect the financial independence of judges and prosecutors and may contradict the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court, reports IPN.

The IPRE analysis aims at the effects of the project on judges, prosecutors, the Superior Council of Magistracy, the Superior Council of Prosecutors, as well as on the staff of the courts and the Prosecutor’s Office.

Experts believe that the general objectives of the reform – simplifying the wage system, strengthening the basic salary, reducing bonuses, and increasing transparency – are justified. However, the mechanisms proposed for the justice sector require adjustments before the law is adopted.

One of the main issues identified relates to the annual adjustment of the reference value used in calculating the salaries of judges and prosecutors. According to IPRE, the project ties this adjustment to the economic situation and the possibilities of the public budget, while the Constitutional Court has ruled that this should be mandatory and should take into account at least the average annual inflation rate.

Experts criticize the introduction of different salary reference values for judges and prosecutors who have passed the external evaluation. According to the note, the difference between the values of 4,700 and 6,200 lei could generate a wage gap of almost 32% between people with the same roles and responsibilities. IPRE argues that rewarding those who have passed the external evaluation could be applied only temporarily, through a separate allowance, not through permanent differences in the basic salary.

In this context, experts recommend the establishment of a mandatory mechanism for the annual adjustment of judges’ and prosecutors’ salaries, the review of wage differences related to external evaluation, and the involvement of the SCM and CSP in the process of determining roles and salary scales within the justice system.

0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail


Igor Dodon: CC’s judgment was absolutely predictable

The leader of the Party of Socialists (PSRM) Igor Dodon said the Constitutional Court’s judgment by which President Maia Sandu’s decree to nominate Natalia Gavrilița for premiership again was declared unconstitutional was absolutely predictable. Dodon demands that Maia Sandu should immediately issue a new decree to nominate a legal candidate for Prime Minister, namely Mariana Durleșteanu, who was proposed by a legally formed parliamentary majority, IPN reports.

“I do not have any political satisfaction following the CC’s decision. Neither I, nor my colleagues from the PSRM gained something from this decision. It is not intended to ensure political satisfaction, but comes to stop the President’s departure from the Constitution after she showed that she uses again double standards and the notion of rule of law is valid for each citizen except the President, who places herself above the country’s Constitution,” Igor Dodon posted on Facebook. He warns President Maia Sandu that she lives in a parliamentary republic and does not play the decisive role and cannot annul the Parliament’s role in this state.

The PSRM issued a press release, saying that it took note of the CC’s judgment. “We call on all the political players to continue the civilized dialogue so as to identify the optimal solution and overcome the political and institutional crisis. The PSRM continues to be open to discussions and will do its best to bring the crisis to an end and will focus on real solutions expected by the people. The politicians should not sell illusions, but should propose measures for improving the people’s life,” said the party.

The Constitutional Court (CC) held that for Article 98, par. 1 of the Constitution to be obeyed, the parliamentary groups and the President of the Republic of Moldova must hold new consultations.


In July, France recorded the highest average monthly temperature in over 100 years, amidst a prolonged heatwave and severe drought. These phenomena have increased the risk of vegetation fires and have affected agriculture, reports IPN.

According to the National Meteorology Service Météo-France, the average temperature in July reached +24.9 degrees Celsius, the highest value recorded since 1900. The record surpasses previous values set in August 2003 and July 2006. The average monthly temperature was 3.8 degrees above the norm for the period, and the daily highs exceeded the climatological average by 5.2 degrees.

At the same time, France is facing the most severe soil drought ever recorded for the end of July. The low level of humidity affects agricultural crops and favors the outbreak of vegetation fires.

Heatwaves and fires have affected several European states in recent weeks. In France, a fire that broke out near Bordeaux led to the evacuation of about 220 thousand people. In Spain, temperatures have once again exceeded +40 degrees Celsius, and in Greece, several localities have been evacuated due to fires fueled by drought and strong winds.

Specialists warn that climate change contributes to the intensification of heatwaves and extreme phenomena. Europe is the continent that is warming up the fastest, and periods of drought, high temperatures, and vegetation fires are becoming increasingly frequent.

0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail




1 IANUARIE, 2025
1 IANUARIE, 2025