“If it had been differently, the politicians would have sat at the negotiating table to find a happy solution to renovate the composition of Parliament, given the impact of the pandemic crisis on the eventual elections. It seems that we know what the cause of the irresponsibility is – amateurism of chess players who permanently cheat, eroding eventual partners’ confidence…”
Worth the effort?
Parliament Speaker Zinaida Grechanyi decided to anticipate an eventual usurpation of the power by President Maia Sandu and addressed a letter to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe (CoE) Marija Pejčinović Burić. The goal of the message is to engage the high-ranking European official as a mediator in the institutional conflict between the presidential administration and Parliament in order to restore the rule of law and return to constitutionality.
Zinaida Grechanyi’s accusations to the President are serious, but lack essence. That’s why their presentation to the European forums lacks consistency, primarily because from the message we must understand that only the personal mediation of the Secretary General of the CoE can help the main state institutions return to constitutionality. In fact, things are much more prosaic and are presented in a provincial way. What should the Secretary General of the CoE discover when examining the Moldovan Speaker’s approach? And what actions can the official take to contribute to restoring the rule of law in the Republic of Moldova? First of all, the Secretary General of the CoE should inform herself about the political essence of the conflict between the presidential administration and Parliament:
- The presidential administration and the parliamentary majority of the Party of Socialists of the Republic of Moldova (PSRM) and the Shor Party have differing views on the opportunity of dissolving Parliament and holding snap parliamentary elections;
- The presidential administration’s view is very rigid. It considers Parliaments should be dissolved and snap parliamentary elections should be held after three months of governmental crisis, as Article 85(1) of the Constitution provides;
- Speaker Zinaida Grechanyi’s view is oscillating, opportunistic. The PSRM, when being led by Zinaida Grechanyi, welcomed the resignation of the Chicu Government on December 23, 2020, which was aimed at triggering snap parliamentary elections. Later, the PSRM changed its attitude to the opportunity of dissolving Parliament for several times, under the influence of opinion polls and worsening pandemic situation;
- To justify her oscillating behavior, the Speaker and the Socialist parliamentary group accepted a compromise, forming a parliamentary majority with the group of the Shor Party, which represents the interests of the mafia and bandits (min.07.00-15.21), as they consider.
Probably, the conclusion of the Secretary General of the CoE would be that the Moldovan politicians are not good at doing calculations, develop ramified scenarios in order to display their visionary courage and change their stance when they see that things do not turn out as planned, invoking the necessity of obeying the constitutional norms. That’s why the Secretary General of the CoE, after she informs helrself about Moldovan politicians’ maneuvers, will transmit the request to the specialized bodies of the CoE for these to pronounce on the legal essence of the conflict. Evidently, given the role of the Constitutional Court (CC) of the Republic of Moldova in solving constitutional issues, the vicious circle of the complaint will be probably closed this way.
Eluding role of Constitutional Court
Zinaida Grechanyi’s message to the Secretary General of the CoE has only one goal – to elude the role of the Constructional Court in solving the dispute between the presidential administration and Parliament. The main conclusion is that the Speaker and the Socialist parliamentary group anticipate a particular response form the CC to President Maia Sandu’s application concerning the circumstances that justify the dissolution of Parliament. This is the only reason why the Speaker decided to anticipate things by making a complaint to the CoE. By such an action, they probably aim to exert pressure on the CC so as to delay the examination of the application for the reason that the CoE could become somehow involved in the dispute between the presidential administration and Parliament. It is a wrong move and it is highly improbable that the CoE will fall into such a trap.
First of all, the European institutions got used to the utilization of imprecisely defined legal terms by the Moldovan politicians. The invoking in the message to the CoE of the usurpation of the power is absolutely useless. Evidently, the usurpation of the power can be invoked when the sovereign people are hampered by stratagems or by brutal use of force to exercise the power directly or through the agency of their representatives. In the concrete conflict between the presidential administration and Parliament, the situation is absolutely different – the presidential administration, which is accused of usurpation of the power, insists on the solving of a political-legal dispute through the direct involvement of the citizens, who are invited to elections.
Secondly, it is opportune to encourage, not to undermine the CC’s effort to adjust the own case law concerning the relations between the presidential administration and Parliament. Regrettably, the CC’s case law in this field remains sinusoidal, bearing the imprint of the previous compromise. Therefore, we can assert that the provisions of the CC’s judgment on the circumstances that justify the dissolution of Parliament are by far unpredictable. The CC is to find a middle-ground solution, maneuvering between three pillars of the own case law that was developed in time, in absolutely different circumstances:
- “regardless of the circumstances that determined the absence of a vote of confidence, the failure to form the new Government within three months inevitably leads to the dissolution of Parliament. An outgoing Government with an acting Prime Minister cannot be perpetual (par. 76)”;
- If an absolute formalized parliamentary majority is formed, the President of the Republic of Moldova is obliged to nominate the candidate proposed by this majority for Prime Minister. Given its own case law, the CC should determine if this clause also refers to the period coming after three months of interim governance;
- If the President of the Republic refuses to nominate the candidate for Prime Minister proposed by the formalized parliamentary majority, this situation should be solved through the angle of article 89 of the Constitution, which provides that the President of the Republic is suspended from post and dismissed.
We see that in the aforementioned circumstances, Zinaida Grechanyi’s request for the CoE to mediate the conflict between the presidential administration and Parliament is absolutely inopportune and even harmful.
Conclusions
The message of Speaker Zinaida Grechanyi to the Secretary General of the CoE is a serious political mistake. The invoking of the usurpation of the power by those who insist on the direct expressing of the people’s will in legislative elections is a proof of the full lack of understanding of what usurpation means.
The complaining to the CoE places the sovereignty and independence of the Republic of Moldova in a bad light. The taking of a conflict between state institutions to the level of mediation of the Secretary General of the CoE is a sample of political infantilism. This means the PSRM , which asked for the CoE’s mediation, wants a decision from outside to be provided to an internal conflict, eluding the procedures and role of the state institutions.
By the approach made by the Parliament Speaker, the PSRM and its leaders show that they do not trust the state institutors in whose reconfiguration they took part in 2019. Moreover, a the forming of a coalition by the PSRM with forces that were earlier accused by it of being representatives of the mafia and the bandits – the Shor Party and dispersed fragments of Plahotniuc’s part - shows that the PSRM slips towards covering the obscure interests of the fugitive politicians.
Leaving aside the dispute between the presidential administration and Parliament, we must admit that the political class in the Republic of Moldova is irresponsible. If it had been differently, the politicians would have sat at the negotiating table to find a happy solution to renovate the composition of Parliament, given the impact of the pandemic crisis on the eventual elections. It seems that we know what the cause of the irresponsibility is – amateurism of chess players who permanently cheat, eroding eventual partners’ confidence.
Victor Pelin
See related articles:
- Common candidate, slightly independent... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Prospects of battle of Pobeda bloc. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Conduct of 2024 census. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Presidential amnesia syndrome. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Impact of setting of date of presidential election and constitutional referendum. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Communist-Socialist gorillas against Victory. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Ex-premier Vasile Tarlev’s fourth attempt to return to politics. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Day of victory over fascism against the background of its reanimation. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- About constitutional referendum. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Manipulation by omission and shifting of emphasis. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Thoughts on 15th anniversary of April 7-8, 2009 events... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Referendum inflation. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Thoughts generated by Moscow terrorist attack. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Intrigue of Russia presidential election. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Guțul eclipsed Vlah? Op-ed by Victor Pelin
- Why does Irina Vlah’s platform risk not enjoying support? Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- What is at stake in presidential election. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Danger of fifth column and reaction of society. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Consequences of Yalta Conference: liberators vs. occupiers. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Sample of plagiarism and manipulation by omission. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Who won the elections yet? Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- About author of transformation of utopia into antiutopia. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- About state anti-Semitism... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- About miracles and winter holidays... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Longest war of Soviet imperialism. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Origin of culture of denouncements and informers. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Story of white bull is not most boring one... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Choice of Bessarabians... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Reanimation of propaganda reflexes. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- About memorable dates and undelivered promises... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Loss and reassertion of identity... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- On brink of eternity... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Interpretation of polls by politicians. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Glorification of Soviet-Nazi victory. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Choice imposed by two symbolic events. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Many mobilized, few elected... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Threats and intimidation on Independence Day. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- The impossibility of communism with a human face. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Second attempt to step into same river. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Gagauz crisis – developer of moral decadence. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Inauguration of governor of Dreamland... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Carthage must be destroyed! Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Ace of spades and resuscitation of success story. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Forcing doors open... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Special civil military operation. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- While waiting for Constitutional Court judgment... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Electoral prelude... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Dreamland of political adventurists... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Habit cures habit? Op-Ed de Victor Pelin
- Ultima ratio. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Fair of Communist-Socialist generosity. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Without MIR, for peace between nations, against aggression... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Silence kept by wedding party guests and deception of Shor’s victim... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Echo of April 7 events… Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Justifying rhetoric for eventual Russian aggression. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Exaggerated capacities of Maia Sandu... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Igor Dodon’s premonitions and its effects. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Communists make call for terror? Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- How long will we remain caught in the toils of falsehoods? Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Subversive actions – Russia relapses? Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Critics of Gavrilița Government... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Apostles of war. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Times of Natashas have come? Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Traditional values... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Black swan, the last hope... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Regime of Putin declared terrorist. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Lost letters. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- The European alternative of Mayor Ion Ceban. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- When hounds growls, puppies also bark... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Devastating potential of powerful Putinist ideas. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- The crab, the frog and a pike... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Europeanization of Gagauzia. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Cooperation with NATO and complementation of 3C strategy. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- About benefits of occupation... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Geopolitical alternative, stake of opposition. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Wormhole and end of Moldovan geopolitics... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Half-truths more dangerous than lies... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- 3D – Despair, Demagogy, Deja-vu – strategy. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Natalia beating round the bush in Big House. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Weak government challenged by discredited and confused opposition. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- End of post-Soviet transition. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Misanthrope atavism. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- May! Labor! Peace? Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Spring fever and opium for people. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- What purpose do opinion polls serve? Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Hybrid warfare of government and opposition. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Invitation to aggression ... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Maia Sandu and PAS – beneficiaries of special operation... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Kaa and hypnotized monkeys. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Russian or Arab spring? Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Russia builds a new world order... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Crocodile will not pull back... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- The powder keg. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Like it or not, country will rebuild itself. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Multipolar world after 15 years of pretensions... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Socialists oscillating between three models. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- What is permissible for Jupiter is not permissible for ... Op-Ed by VictorPelin
- Between hammer and anvil. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- 2022, year of geopolitical crises. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- “Congress of winners” or Parallels between Igor Dodon and Mahtama Gandhi. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Enigma shrouded in mystery... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Revolt of Ilan Șor’s company... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Pension system and politicians’ speculations. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- What is good and what is bad... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- How to fight hatred and foolishness? Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Maia Sandu’s one year of presidency. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Gerontocracy in action. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- We do not surrender country to foreigners? Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- First electoral test for new government. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Năstase, Filip, Dodon... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Cases of Stoianoglo and Gațcan. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Yellow and maroon bullshit. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Charm of electronic voting. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Moldova, Moldovans, Moldovan? Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Lustration. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Waiting for good times... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Similar steps in foreign policy... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
-
- Stepping on rakes. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Power and opposition... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Vote of Transnistrians. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Electoral confusions. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Danger of disappearance of Moldova. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Lack of discernment. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Futuristic reflections. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Electoral fibs. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Voronin’s panegyric. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Speculative geopolitics. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Turns of political weathervanes. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Assimilators and pretenders to Plahotniuc’s inheritance. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Does Moldova have a future? Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Communists’ amnesia. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Who divides society? Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- About electoral blocs. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Joint effort of parties of the left... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- About constitutional aberrations. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Usurpations of usurped power… Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Danger of regional war... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Bafflement of Socialists. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Competition of Igor Dodon vs. Maia Sandu. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Enigma of April 7, 2009 events. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Vaccination and political games. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Why is Maia Sandu more dangerous than Vlad Plahotniuc? Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Institutional memory of Moldova’s presidential administration. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Coalition of the brazen. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Steps towards Union... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Troublesome decree. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Success of failure... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Balance of accomplishments of Presidents elected by general vote... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Orthodox Church in danger... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- PSRM, QUO VADIS? Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Confrontation between Mentor and Tester. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Russia confirms high quality of Moldovan wine. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- “List of sins” of Maia Sandu. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Maia Sandu’s “taburetka”. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Delayed actions of Maia Sandu. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Socialists’ departures and decline. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Inevitability of snap elections. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Boomerang. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- In Moscow, after directives... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Unfavorable inheritance. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Danger of Igor Dodon’s opportunism. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Preparations for snap elections. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Electoral performance of unionists. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Grimaces of neo-paganism. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Socialists’ dilemma. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- From defeat to defeat up to victory... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- National consensus and division of society. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Imperialist movement vs. NGOs. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Paganism vs. Christian values. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Renato Usatyi versus Igor Dodon. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Ana Guțu and watchdogs. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Splendor and misery... of propagandists. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- About lackeys and sons of a bitch. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Bifurcated candidates. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- The discrepancy between words and deeds. Op-Ed byVictor Pelin
- Coincidence? I don’t think so! Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Moldovan political fauna, Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- It looks uglier in reality than from afar, Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- “Russian people’s present”, Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Independence Day. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Commemoration of victims of totalitarian regimes. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Vaccination and chipping of Moldovans. Pamphlet by Victor Pelin
- Balanced foreign policy. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Solution: Annulment of presidential elections! Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Beam in Maia’s eye… Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- A new attack with gases, Op-Ed
- Renato Usatyi – President Dodon’s Furgal, Op-Ed
- While waiting for... Patriarch Kirill, Op-Ed
- President Dodon’s change of orientation, Op-Ed
- Where is the money, Ștefănică? Op-Ed