|
|
|
Although the Cypriot model offers some political solutions for new candidate countries with unresolved territorial issues, it is only a 'semi-precedent' that requires individual approaches for Ukraine, Moldova, and Georgia. Neither the Greek veto nor the Turkish factor is present in the case of the "Associated Trio" countries to replicate Cyprus' accession to the EU. Instead, they face a violent and unpredictable geopolitical actor: Russia...
|
Dionis Cenuşa, Senior Contributor |
|
Against the backdrop of a radical reset of the regional geopolitical context, joining the European Union (EU) is a necessity, not just a historic opportunity, for Ukraine, Moldova, and Georgia in their efforts to consolidate their own statehood. In addition, embracing the European vector would make possible a future detachment from the Russian sphere of influence, provided that the reforms initiated generate order and prosperity, and depopulation is stopped.
The fate of the “frozen conflicts” and whether the Russian military threat, which could be used by future European elites to block the three countries' progress towards the eventual accession stage, matters no less significantly.
The current European leadership admits that a situation similar to the acceptance of divided Cyprus as an EU member state may be repeated. The head of EU diplomacy, Josep Borrell, referred to the Cypriot precedent in the context of the Transnistrian conflict in Moldova. The same argument applies to Georgia, but also to Ukraine, which launched a military counter-offensive in June to liberate all of its territories from Russian occupation, including Crimea. However, the details of the Cypriot model require more nuanced analysis to determine the plausibility of using it as a precedent for the “Associated Trio” countries.
The European agenda of the “Associated Trio” - technical progress and political ambitions
Although the completion of the pre-accession requirements set by the EU in June 2022 is advancing, none of the three countries has fully complied with them. They had almost a year at their disposal, but the nature of the reforms implies systemic changes, which require time, sufficient financial resources, a functional administrative apparatus, competent human capital, political stability, and adequate security ambiance (absence of war). The traditional problems for these countries refer to justice, the fight against political and high-level corruption, the reform of local public administration, etc. According to the EU mid-term evaluation, Moldova has fully implemented three out of 9 conditions (33%), followed by Ukraine with two requirements out of 7 (28%). Georgia is tied with three conditions out of 12 fully met or 25%.
All three countries have similar strategies to achieve the goal of European integration, that is, to meet the technical aspects of the EU requirements. The political side depends on the subjectivity of Brussels in the face of the actions and speeches of the governing elites in Kyiv, Chisinau, and Tbilisi. The EU has clear preferences for Ukraine and Moldova. A dilemma situation persists in relation to Georgia. The EU has to decide between the pro-EU sympathies of the population and the geostrategic role of the country, on the one hand, and the oligarchic political system combined with aggressive Euroscepticism of the government, on the other.
Ukraine’s intention is to start accession negotiations as early as 2024, and President Volodymyr Zelensky is using his political weight to advance the Ukrainian cause among European leaders. The opening of negotiations is also presented as a way to boost the morale of the Ukrainian army, engaged in the fight against Russian aggression (President.gov.ua, June 2023). Moldovan political rulers are trying to send political signals to national institutions and European chancelleries regarding their determination to fulfill EU requirements. In this sense, in the context of criticism that she would exert political influence on reforms in the field of justice, President Maia Sandu suggested to the Supreme Council of the Magistracy and to the members of the Pre-Vetting Commission that the accession to the EU depends on the fight against corruption in the judiciary. Georgia is in a delicate situation. Both the EU and the majority of civil society have legitimate objections related to the quality of the political reforms, the repressive nature of the regime, and the influence of informal oligarchic actors (Bidzina Ivanishvili). However, the Georgian government considers that 11 of the 12 EU conditions (Agenda.ge, June 2023) are already implemented, contradicting the objectivity of the assessments made by the European institutions. Even if meeting the pre-accession conditions is the only requirement for candidate country status (Interpressnews, June 2023), non-alignment with sanctions against Russia could be an additional, but unstated, political obstacle.
The “Cypriot precedent”: the conditioning of Greece and the size of the uncontrolled area
Suggested as a precedent by Borrell, Cyprus’ accession to the EU in 2004 took place in a context of tense relations between Greece and Turkey and persistent deadlocks in the island's reunification process. As an EU member state since 1981, Greece has treated Turkey's pre-accession dialogue and accession negotiations with the EU, initiated in 1999 and 2005 respectively, as ways of influencing both the settlement of the Cyprus issue and the resolution of the Turkish-Greek disputes, including territorial ones. The right of veto in the field of enlargement, which the EU member states possess, gave the Greek factor an advantage in the process of Turkey’s accession to the EU. Subsequently, Greece extended the same lever on its relations with the EU and its enlargement policy towards Central and Eastern Europe (ex-socialist and ex-Soviet space) to promote the Cypriot candidacy, presented in 1990. Specifically, Greece conditioned the enlargement of the EU to the East, through the accession of nine states, with the inclusion of Cyprus in the same wave (EuObserver, 2002). This step was achieved, despite the fact that the island remained ununified and with a disputed Turkish military presence in the northern region of Cyprus.
According to some estimates, the Greek Cypriot community saw added value in the EU accession process for the reintegration of the island. Thus, the Turkish minority would have received security and freedom guarantees, including in the field of free movement of people, as a result of Cyprus' accession to the European Economic Community (EEC-EU). Already in the pre-accession stage, the export of the Greek part of the island with the EEC was 50% and the Turkish part 64%. This trade dependence on the European market was another argument in favor of the island's accession as a whole to the EEC (EU) area.
In 1998 EU documents, the integration of the northern part of Cyprus, controlled by the Turkish Cypriot community, with the military support of Turkey (NATO membership since 1952), is considered manageable, if carried out as part of the accession of Cyprus to the EU. The EU’s openness to such a scenario was based on the territorial and population dimensions of the region controlled by the Turkish side, and the region’s potential in the field of tourism and agriculture was rated as an advantage. The only major objections raised by Brussels at the time concerned the need to align the region’s infrastructure standards with those of the rest of the Greek Cypriot-ruled island.
Yet even 19 years after Cyprus joined the EU, the island remains divided. The main reasons relate to the limited attractiveness of the EU for reunification and the deadlock in Turkey’s accession negotiations, including Turkey’s non-implementation of the Additional Protocol to the Association Agreement with the EU in relation to Cyprus. Both the Greek veto and the EU’s intention to contribute to the reunification of Cyprus served as essential factors in Cyprus’ accession. However, so that the lack of territorial integrity in the candidate country does not represent a problem for the EU, other aspects also matter. The Cypriot example is rather sui generis, since not only is the size of the population in the breakaway region (the area controlled by the Turkish minority) negligible, but the external actor opposing reunification is an EU candidate country and NATO member: Turkey (with 40,000 soldiers stationed in Northern Cyprus in 2022). From this point of view, Cyprus could represent a kind of “semi-precedent” for the European integration of states with frozen conflicts and respectively armed conflicts (external military aggression) of Eastern Europe and the South Caucasus - Moldova, Georgia, and, respectively, Ukraine. Obviously, European integration represents an incentive for the territorial reintegration of these countries. However, unlike Cyprus, the territorial problems facing Ukraine, Moldova, and Georgia stem from Russia’s aggressive stance that fuels and/or reproduces “frozen conflicts” in the ex-Soviet space, later used as a source of geopolitical influence in the region.
The Cypriot “semi-precedent” for Ukraine, Moldova, and Georgia
Emerging from security realities in the countries with regions de facto controlled or occupied by Russia, the Cypriot model currently represents only a “semi-precedent” for the eventual EU membership agenda of Ukraine, Moldova, and Georgia.
Firstly, the balance of forces in the separatist or temporarily occupied regions by Russian forces is constantly changing and will be marked by the results of the Ukrainian counteroffensive and the future of the war. Among the three cases, Moldova has the most influence in moving the Transnistrian conflict toward a peaceful solution. Therefore, the economic dependence on the breakaway regime of Moldova and the EU increases. At the same time, the Transnistrian region’s criminal-political elites are inclined to make concessions in order to survive politically and economically. The situation in Ukraine is currently uncertain due to the continuation of the war, and in the breakaway regions of Georgia - Abkhazia and South Ossetia - Russian political and military control is maintained and/or increased.
Secondly, Cyprus benefited from the Greek veto that forced the EU to accept the island still divided in the wave of enlargements of 2004. In the case of the “Associated Trio”, only Moldova has a degree of historical and identity kinship with another EU member state (Romania) similar to the one between Greece and Cyprus. In theory, Romania has a veto power that can be used to promote Moldova's accession to the EU. But Romania’s intra-European policy is still in the process of manifesting itself and will be partially limited by the fact that it is not yet part of the Schengen area or the eurozone. Poland and the Baltic nations (Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia) could lobby for Ukraine. Georgia is in a more isolated situation. But if qualified majority voting materializes in the area of EU foreign policy and is eventually extended to enlargement policy, then the veto will disappear as a tool used by member states to promote or block candidate countries.
The third and last aspect refers to the size of the population and the territory of the separatist regions effectively occupied by Russia (See Table below). According to the EU’s argument on the manageable size of the region not controlled by official Cyprus, formulated in 1998, Moldova and Georgia should be eligible for EU membership, having respectively 12% and 20% of their territories occupied. Similar parameters are also observed in terms of the population of the breakaway regions. In the case of Ukraine, the removal of Russian territorial occupation is currently underway. At the same time, in addition to the EU’s ability to digest candidates with breakaway regions, the geopolitical actor that produces or feeds territorial disintegration also matters. Contrary to the negative image of Turkey, a candidate country for EU membership and a NATO member, in the case of Cyprus, Russia is perceived as a direct military threat both by the EU and by Ukraine, Moldova, and Georgia.
Table. Comparison parameters between Cyprus, Ukraine, Moldova, and Georgia: population and territory in uncontrolled regions, year of candidate status, destructive geopolitical actors
|
Cyprus
|
Ukraine
|
Moldova
|
Georgia
|
Population until accession to the EU, uncontrolled area
|
1998:
88,000
12%
|
2023:
2,000,000 (only in the occupied Crimea)
5%
|
2023:
350,000
13%
|
2023:
300,000
8%
|
Uncontrolled territory, %
|
36%
|
16%
|
12%
|
20%
|
Candidate status, year
|
1993
|
2022
|
2022
|
Pending since 2022
|
Qualification of the external actor that blocks the reinsertion
|
Tukey - EU candidate, NATO member state
|
Russia – aggressor state, source of threat to the EU
|
Russia – aggressor state, source of threat to the EU
|
Russia – aggressor state, source of threat to the EU
|
Source: Author's estimates, based on open sources. In the case of Ukraine, the percentage of the population is calculated for Crimea, within the internationally recognized borders of 1991, based on the fact that Ukrainian refugees constitute approximately 7 million, of which 4 million are in EU states.
In lieu of conclusions...
Although the Cypriot model offers some political solutions for new candidate countries with unresolved territorial issues, it is only a “semi-precedent” that requires individual approaches for Ukraine, Moldova, and Georgia. Neither the Greek veto nor the Turkish factor is present in the case of the countries of the “Associated Trio” to replicate the accession of Cyprus to the EU. Instead, they are facing a violent and unpredictable geopolitical player: Russia.
The Ukrainian counteroffensive may have the nature of revising the balance of forces even in areas with “frozen conflicts.” If Ukraine’s military success will facilitate the substantial undermining of Russian levers of influence over decision-making processes in the breakaway regions, then the European integration of Ukraine, Moldova, and Georgia may become a useful tool for territorial reintegration. In any case, if the three countries meet the conditions for the start of (pre-)accession negotiations, close the accession chapters and are accepted to join in the tangible future, then, as in the case of Cyprus, membership of the EU may be insufficient to reintegrate breakaway territories. Until then, the three countries must begin accession negotiations, for which they must produce credible, sustainable and transformative reforms in the immediate present.
Dionis Cenuşa, Senior Contributor
Dionis Cenușa is a political scientist, researcher at the Institute of Political Sciences at Liebig-Justus University in Giessen, Germany, MA degree in Interdisciplinary European Studies from the College of Europe in Warsaw.
Areas of research: European Neighborhood Policy, EU-Moldova relationship, EU's foreign policy and Russia, migration and energy security.
Follow Dionis Cenușa on
Twitter
IPN publishes in the Op-Ed rubric opinion pieces submitted by authors not affiliated with our editorial board. The opinions expressed in these articles do not necessarily coincide with the opinions of our editorial board.
Dionis Cenușa
See related articles:
- "Multi-vector" foreign policy and European integration: the realities of Serbia, Moldova and Georgia. Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Differentiated European accession: the imminent decoupling of Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia. Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- (Geo)political polarization in Georgia and Moldova and what is at stake for the EU and Russia. Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Prevalence of the geopolitical factor in the EU accession agenda of Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova. Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- The new EU defense agenda and the dynamics in Eastern Europe. Analysis of Dionis Cenușa
- Forecasts for Eastern Europe in 2024: The crisis of EU influence and the electoral renewal of autocracies. Analysis of Dionis Cenusa
- The Hungarian-Russian factor and the Ukrainian dimension of the EU's eastern enlargement. Analysis of Dionis Cenusa
- The Middle East crisis and the European perspective for Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia. Analysis of Dionis Cenusa
- The Transnistrian conflict settlement: three scenarios in the context of the geostrategic interests of Moldova, Ukraine and Russia. Analysis by Dionis Cenusa
- The effects of the anti-government protests in Georgia and Moldova on the EU positions. Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Russia and the geopolitical costs of war: the "frozen conflicts" in Moldova and Azerbaijan. Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia on the road to the EU: 5 principles to make reforms more efficient. Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Bringing Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia closer to the EU: a multi-speed progress. Analysis by Dionis Cenusa
- Disinhibiting EU strategic thinking under the pressure of Russian militarist revisionism: breaking European "taboos". Analysis by Dionis Cenusa
- Preventing Russian-origin threats in 2023: three priorities for risk reduction for the West. Analysis by Dionis Cenusa
- "Reshaping" of regional critical infrastructure under the impact of war: the case of Ukraine, Russia and the EU. Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- The energy crisis in Moldova and support for reunification with Romania, analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Ukraine's critical infrastructure vs. Russia's energy positioning - the "war of nerves". Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- The parameters of Western aid to Ukraine and Moldova: preparation for the “Russian winter”. Analysis by Dionis Cenusa
- Russian Tactics against Ukraine and Moldova: Ramifications of the Energy Crises. Analysis of Dionis Cenușa
- Russian attacks on critical infrastructure: risks for Ukraine's resilience and implications for the EU. Analysis of Dionis Cenușa
- The new scenarios of Russian aggression in the light of the illegal annexation of southeastern Ukraine. Analysis of Dionis Cenusa
- Moldova-Russia relations: between anti-governmental protests and gas blackmail. Analysis by Dionis Cenusa
- Russia's gas war and the EU's resilience test: three Russian goals and three European dilemmas. Analysis by Dionis Cenusa
- The de-oligarchization of Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia: the EU condition for advancing the European perspective. Analysis by Dionis Cenuşa
- Georgia and Moldova: Comparative analysis of state resilience and risks of Russian origin. Analysis of Dionis Cenusa
- EU sanctions and Russia's energy weapon - solidarity versus fragmentation. Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Moldova and the candidacy for the EU: between the loss of legitimacy and the need for a national dialogue. Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- EU membership candidacy: internal and geopolitical differences between Ukraine and Moldova. Analysis of Dionis Cenușa
- The race for EU membership status: the three scenarios for Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia. Analysis of Dionis Cenușa
- EU energy autonomy and "crisis" of sanctions against Russia: between blockades and new alternatives. Aanalysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Regional insecurity and the search for resilience for Moldova - based on EU or NATO assistance? Analysis by Dionis Cenusa
- New trends in aggression against Ukraine, Western sanctions and Russian energy weapon
- Moldova and Georgia's Dialogue with the EU and NATO: Seeking External Attention and Resources for State Resilience. Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- The "new" European agenda of Moldova, the unification with Romania and the separation of the Transnistria region. Analysis of Dionis Cenușa
- Sanctions against Russia to save Ukraine and the Chinese factor, analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- The Russian invasion and the "rivalry" of Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia for accession to the EU. Analysis of Dionis Cenușa
- Russian crisis 2.0: Ukraine's demands towards the West in the face of new scenarios in Moscow. Analysis of Dionis Cenușa
- The role of EU assistance in Moldova's detachment from Russia. Analysis of Dionis Cenușa
- Ukrainianization of European security: Why is Russia acting now? Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Top Seven Forecasts for the Eastern Partnership in 2022: Stress Test for Local Reforms and Pressure from Regional Geopolitical Competition. Analysis of Dionis Cenușa
- Top 5 advances and challenges in the EaP in 2021: pro-EU resilience and new sources of regional instability. Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Germany's post-Merkel foreign policy: more pro-European in Eastern Europe, tougher on Russia. Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Moldova's foreign policy - between "interconnection" with Romania and "balancing" with Russia. Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- The migration crisis in Belarus, the EU’s weaknesses and the scenarios of the Lukashenko regime. Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Drawing lessons from Moldova on EU energy security and the Russian monopoly. Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Russia's intentions to counter Western influence in the CIS space, analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Revitalizing the EU-Moldova dialogue: between geopolitical enthusiasm, “historical moment” and local limitations, analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Between EU expectations and the political reality in Georgia and Moldova: contradictions and risks, analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- The Post-Merkel Era and the Fate of Eastern Europeans: Continuation of European Integration and Restoration of Territorial Integrity, Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Resuscitation of Russia-Moldova relations and the impact of the European vector. Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Resolving territorial conflicts in the Eastern Partnership: In search of a personalized EU approach, analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Georgia-Moldova-Ukraine “Association” Triangle: Deepening EU Integration and the “Shield” Against Russian Influence, Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- EU Economic Sanctions and Vulnerability of the Eastern Partnership to Belarusian Precedent. Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Early Elections in Moldova and the Geopolitical Power of the Diaspora. Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Deepening differentiation within the Eastern Partnership and the emergence of the pan-European "Trio". Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Oligarchy in Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine: between withdrawal, regrouping and “re-education”. Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Public Attitudes in Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine towards the EU - between Adoration and Moderation. Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Adjusting the visa-free regime with the EU for Eastern Europeans - from the pandemic to the "green pass". Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- "Sputnik V" at the EU border and Russia's targets in Moldova, Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- The signs of “vaccine diplomacy” in Moldova: Romania's advantages over Russia. Analysis by Dionis Cenușă
- The EU’s calculus in Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova - navigating between political crises, reforms and the "shadows" of Russia. Analysis by Dionis Cenușă
- Anticipating Russia's reaction to future EU sanctions: division, disinformation or destabilization? Analysis by Dionis Cenușă
- EU-Russia relationship in 2021 - between "distorted pragmatism" and "resilient foreign policy", Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Re-Europeanization of Moldova's foreign policy and the EU's position on the Moldovan political crisis, Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Top eight forecasts for Eastern Partnership states in 2021 - between “contestation” and “renewal”. Analysis by Dionis Cenușă
- The Eastern Partnership's Top 5 Opportunities and Challenges in 2020, Analysis by Dionis Cenușă
- The EU, the "Magnitsky Act" and targeting autocrats in the Eastern neighborhood. Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Moldova-Russia relationship and the post-Dodon transition - between “rational” and “emotional” approaches, Analysis by Dionis Cenușă
- Informational resilience near the eastern borders of the EU, Analysis by Dionis Cenușă
- The EU's eastern neighborhood at a new crossroad - between electoral riddles and security crises, analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Moldova - presidential elections without a "geopolitical vote"? Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- The perspective of Russia, China and the EU on the political crisis in Belarus - between intervention, support and influence, analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Belarus - a new "velvet revolution" in the Eastern Partnership? Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- The „darlings” of the EU conditionality mechanism - Georgia, Moldova or Ukraine? Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- The effects of EU actions in Moldova - financial assistance and the opposition’s contradictions. Analysis
- Germany’s Presidency in the EU Council and the Eastern Partnership’s future: A Guide to handling an "uncomfortable" reality, analysis
- The EU's political agenda and the "moving sands" in Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia, analysis
- The EU's conditionality and fighting Euroscepticism in Eastern Partnership, Op-Ed
- The Eurasian Union and the health crisis: lacking integration and geopolitical ambitions, Op-Ed
- NATO’s solidarity and the Russian factor: the tough lesson of state resilience, Op-Ed
- China and Russia – the health diplomacy and the "fragmentation” of Europe, Op-Ed
- On the effects of the Pandemic – between European solidarity and the Eastern neighbourhood's resilience, Op-Ed
- The "falling governments" in Moldova and Ukraine: Four similarities and two differences, Op-Ed
- European integration in the EU's neighbourhood: With or without "de-geopoliticization”?, Op-Ed
- “Macronization” of EU-Russia ties and effects on Eastern neighborhood, Op-Ed
- Moldova-Romania unification, migration and European integration in the East, Op-Ed
- Immobilization of the oligarchs in Moldova, Georgia and Ukraine: mission (im)possible? Op-Ed
- Ten forecasts for 2020: “Geopolitization” of the oligarchy in Moldova and EU-Russia rapprochement, Op-Ed
- Year of "Shortened" Europtimism in Moldova: Top 3 Successes and Setbacks in 2019. Op-Ed
- Romania-Moldova dialogue: from “calm tone” to the conditionality regime, Op-Ed
- Traumatized European perspective in EU’s vicinity and the Moldovan echoes, Op-Ed
- EU-Moldova dialogue: Is there European integration after Maia Sandu’s government?, Op-Ed
- Enlargements "in between" the EU and the Eurasian Union: Serbia and Moldova as showcase, Op-Ed
- EU macro-financial aid for Moldova: objective rewarding or political stimulation?, OP-ED
- Russia, the EU and the restoring geopolitical coexistence along the Kiev-Chisinau-Tbilisi line, Op-Ed
- Moldova’s government of reform and the European "credit of trust"
- Moldova's "balanced" foreign policy, the Paris-Moscow axis and the Ukrainian dossier, Op-Ed
- Moldova’s fragile government and the European agenda by 2020, OP-ED
- Unlocking European Assistance for Moldova: with or without conditionality?, OP-ED
- "Anti-oligarchic spring" or temporary illusions in Moldova, Ukraine and Georgia, OP-ED
- Surrendering oligarchic regime, re-launching of European integration in Moldova and Russia’s agenda, OP-ED
- Moldova’s political crisis: Overcoming the geopolitical complex and the "captured state", OP-ED
- Political speeds in Moldova, Ukraine and Georgia: in search of a “virtuous circle”, OP-ED
- Intersection of geopolitical symbols in Moldova: between Soviet past and rights of sexual minorities, OP-ED
- Visa liberalization in Moldova after five years: weaknesses of good governance and comparisons to Ukraine and Georgia, OP-ED
- Post-electoral Moldova: between Russia’s warnings, absence of EU and snap elections, OP-ED
- (Geo)political behavior of Presidents of Moldova, Georgia and Ukraine: between fluctuating perceptions and realities, OP-ED
- Formation of post-electoral coalition in Moldova and Moscow’s benefits, OP-ED
- Diaspora’s power in the Moldovan Elections - Between Perceptions and Realities, OP-ED
- Attitudes of citizens of Moldova, Ukraine and Georgia towards EU and paradoxes of polls, OP-ED
- Ten forecasts for 2019: Reconfiguration of European agenda in Moldova and the rule of law crisis in EU, OP-ED
- Year of disruptions in Moldova’s European integration: Top 3 accomplishments and failures in 2018, OP-ED
- Deficiencies of European conditionality and survival of Moldova political class, OP-ED
- Warning about suspension of visa-free regime for Moldova and synergy of EU criticism, OP-ED
- Difficult coexistence between civil society and oligarchic regimes in Moldova and Georgia, OP-ED
- Failure to insert the European integration in Moldova’s Constitution: losers and winners
- Future of Association Agreements in Moldova, Ukraine and Georgia: local, European and Russian factors, OP-ED
- Opportunities of extraparliamentary opposition, fears of government and positioning towards EU, OP-ED
- Scanning of EU macro-financial assistance to Moldova, Ukraine and Georgia: frontrunners and laggards, OP-ED
- Decay of EU-Moldova relations until a new electoral test, OP-ED
- Antigovernment protests, government’s stratagems and European agenda of Moldova, OP-ED
- Discrepancies between Chisinau and EU and intention to make use of Russian factor, OP-ED
- Is Moldova’s case a dangerous precedent for EU’s relations with Ukraine and Georgia? OP-ED
- Impact of EP resolution: from political crisis of government to attack on EU’s image in Moldova, OP-ED
- Deterioration of EU-Moldova dialogue and calculations of Moldovan government, OP-ED
- Invalidation of elections in Chisinau, government scenarios and EU reaction, OP-ED
- Romanian Presidency of Council of EU and political-energy context in Moldova, OP-ED
- Social protests amid European integration: Why do citizens in Georgia protest more often than those in Moldova? OP-ED
- Impact of rapprochement between EU and Russia on Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova, OP-ED
- Foreign multi-vectorialism of President Dodon and post-electoral geopolitical uncertainties, OP-ED
- Moldova’s energy dependence, avoidance of transparency and ignoring of debt for Russian gas, OP-ED
- EU and limits of “strict conditionality” in relation to Moldova, OP-ED
- Role and implications of (Euro)unionism in Moldova, OP-ED
- Georgia’s European aspirations and lessons to be learned by Moldova, OP-ED
- Regeneration of Putin regime and implications for EaP and Moldova, OP-ED
- (Geo)political scenarios for parliamentary elections of Moldova, OP-ED
- Moldova and EU: a dialogue clogged up with old problems and new expectations, OP-ED
- Diagnosis of oligarchy in Moldova, Ukraine and Georgia and de-oligarchization solutions, OP-ED
- EU assistance for Moldova, hastening of reforms and government’s survival, OP-ED
- European integration, import of EU legislation and practical solutions for shaping benefits, OP-ED
- Moldova and position of EaP leader between forced reforms and advantage of regional comparison, OP-ED
- Moldova’s struggle against Russian misinformation: shortcomings and electoral calculation, OP-ED
- New visa suspension mechanism as an additional instrument targeting corruption in Moldova, Ukraine and Georgia, OP-ED
- Constitutional Court, European integration and (geo)political struggle in Moldova, OP-ED
- Bulgarian presidency of EU Council and effects on Moldova, OP-ED
- Ten predictions for 2018: Electoral test for the European course, resurgence of the pro-Russian forces, OP-ED
- Nature of growth of pro-European perception and attempt to “constitutionalize” European course, OP-ED
- Struggle against Russian propaganda in Moldova, touching of U.S. and European content, OP-ED
- Moldova and prospects of joining EU – lack of political, institutional and emotional readiness on both sides, OP-ED
- Future of EaP and Moldova following Brussels Declaration – between pragmatism and local realities, OP-ED
- What do Eastern Partnership and Moldova go with to Brussels summit? OP-ED
- Moderation of Euroskepticism of President Dodon, Moldova-EU trade and resuscitation of pro-European sympathies, OP-ED
- Legitimacy of governments of EaP, survival of European course and Moldova, OP-ED
- Multiple speeds of Eastern Partnership, civil society and Moldova’s case, OP-ED
- Russia, nationalism in Europe and Moldova, OP-ED
- European integration, pro-European unionism and defects of Moldovan government, OP-ED
- Pro-reform agenda instead of blocking of macro-financial assistance, OP-ED
- Mandate of new Head of EU Delegation to Moldova and first major challenge, OP-ED
- EU’s mission in Eastern neighborhood and Moldova: stimulation of development or European integration? OP-ED
- Magnetization of Eastern Partnership, Russia’s role and implications for Moldova, OP-ED
- Civil society: agents of influence or sanitarians of political system. OP-ED
- European integration in Moldova: elitist project or not?, OP-ED
- Moldova on 26th anniversary of independence: between sustainability and Europeanization, Op-Ed
- The end of Pirkka Tapiola’s tenure, the pro-Russian president and the pro-European oligarch, OP-ED
- Chisinau’s bet: Macro-financial assistance and EU recognition, Op-Ed
- Moldova and “stabilitocracy” in European neighborhood, OP-ED
- Re-evaluation of Moldova-EU Association Agreement: solution or new uncertainties? OP-ED
- EU’s reaction to introduction of mixed electoral system: pragmatism or weakness, OP-ED
- External financing of civil society, government pressure and European integration, OP-ED
- Stimulation of reforms in Moldova, Georgia and Ukraine: new conditionality vs European perspective
- Estonian presidency of EU Council and implications for Moldova
- Restoration of power supplies from Transnistrian region and weakness of European factor, Op-Ed
- Venice Commission, mixed-member electoral system and European assistance, OP-ED
- Role of President Dodon for Russia and implications for European integration, OP-ED
- Priorities of Eastern Partnership until 2020 and how Moldova can benefit from these, OP-ED
- European values versus traditional values and geopolitical subtext in Moldova, OP-ED
- European agenda, civil society and confrontation with government, OP-ED
- Three scenarios concerning fate of EU macro-financial assistance for Moldova, OP-ED
- Halt in EU funding versus uninominal voting system in Moldova, OP-ED
- How did Moldova become a ”captured state”? OP-ED
- Natural disasters in Moldova and opportunities of relationship with EU, OP-ED
- Moldova after three years of visa-free regime with EU and new European realities, OP-ED
- Can Memorandum with Eurasian Union diminish Moldova’s European agenda? OP-ED
- Hidden concerns of EU and adaptability of government, Op-Ed
- Moldova forced to combine CIS and Eurasian Union with European integration, OP-ED
- Pro-reform approach of EU and pro-Russian plans of President Dodon, OP-ED
- Multi-speed in EU and its neighborhood: Where is Moldova? OP-ED
- Pro-European sympathies and role of pro-EU opposition, OP-ED
- Presidential administration vs government: between political coexistence and geopolitical antagonism, OP-ED
- European security and Russia’s approach for a post-Western world, OP-ED
- Association Agreement with EU and paradoxes of President Dodon, OP-ED
- EU dilemma: to criticize government or to combat Euro-skeptical propaganda of pro-Russian President? OP-ED
- Parallel dialogues between EU and Moldova and Russian-Eurasian factor, OP-ED
- Is DCFTA implemented in Transnistrian region or not? OP-ED
- Populism and European integration in Moldova, Op-Ed
- Difficult mission: advancing of Europeanization and restoration of relations with Russia, OP-ED
- Eastern Partnership becomes more ‘practical’. What does Moldova gain? OP-ED
- About ‘application for accession’ to EU and Moldova’s homework, OP-ED IPN
- Energy interconnection with EU: Recipe for diminishing dependence on Transnistria and Russia
- Europeans’ tactic in relation to Chisinau: Reforms here and now, Op-Ed
- Georgia, liberalization of visas with EU and implications for Moldova
- Chisinau accelerates reforms to seduce European Union
- Europeans again in Chisinau: between dialogue with government and protest leaders
- Deciphering EU’s position on Moldova: Real significance versus mistakes and omissions
- Schengen crisis: Does it affect visa-free regime for Moldova or not?
- Western and Russian press about protests in Chisinau: between misinformation and manipulation
- Reactions of EU and U.S. to new anti-government protests in Chisinau
- Idea of early elections in Moldova: New pro-Europeans in Chisinau – “yes”, voices from Brussels - “better no”
- EU under Dutch presidency and allusions to Moldova
- EU in Moldova: recipe for reanimating European course in 2016