World War II was the biggest world war in the history of mankind. In those times, the propaganda justified the necessity of invading other territories. The invasion of other territories and the acts of aggression were presented as steps necessary for liberation. The crimes committed in that war were presented as heroic deeds requested by those who were “liberated”. Many of these things remind of the current time, of the war in Ukraine. Even in such conditions, nostalgia for the former USSR persists and has effects on the current life of Moldovan society and on Moldova’s future development course. How things evolved and where that nostalgia derives from were among the subjects discussed by experts invited to IPN’s public debate “Who started World War II and why? Propaganda myths as a source of nostalgia for the USSR”.
Igor Boțan, the standing expert of IPN’s project, said that a world war implies large coalitions, unions of states that affect the interests of almost all the countries of the world. During such wars, significant political and economic objectives are being pursued. The world wars lead to dramatic changes in the system of international relations. There was an Anti-Hitler Coalition that consisted of 54 states and a Hitler Coalition formed based on the Berlin-Rome-Japan axis during World War II.
The expert noted that World War II had five stages - September 1939-June 1941 when Germany and the Soviet Union were allies, attacking Poland and Finland; June 1941-November 1942 when the alliances were re-formed; November 1942-June 1944 when the Soviet Union started the counteroffensive against the Nazi troops and the three leaders of the Anti-Hitler Coalition met in Teheran; June 1944-May 1945, which ended with the surrender of Germany, and May-September 1945, which ended with the surrender of Japan.
“If we refer to the five stages, it’s clear that the Soviet Union avoided admitting that Germany started the war together with it. That’s why in the Soviet Union, and also in current Russia, they spoke only about two periods during which the Soviet Union was attacked by Nazi Germany and up to the capitation of Germany. The other stages are not taken into account by the Russian propaganda historiographers,” stated Igor Boțan.
Doctor of History Anatol Țăranu, former Ambassador of Moldova to Russia, said that when it goes to the period that preceded World War II, it should be noted that the people, primarily those in Europa, lived under the auspices of the Treaty of Versailles, which brought World War I to an end. This determined the entire geopolitical configuration in Europe in the interwar period. In World War I, Germany suffered a painful defeat and the whole interwar period was marked by Germany’s attempts to recover after this defeat. “This feeling of frustration of Germany was manifested especially after the fascist regime of Hitler came to power in this country. This regime represented extreme nationalism and was actually an element of a racial policy pursued by the National Socialist Party in Germany,” stated Anatol Țăranu.
According to him, France and England, which emerged victorious in World War I, tried to keep the resuts of the war intact as they benefited from these. This struggle between Germany and the beneficiaries of World War I actually filled the interwar period. Furthermore, the Soviet Union towards the start of World War II considerably strengthened its positions, going through socialist industrialization and building extremely powerful armed forces. This was a very important factor for the European and international politics.
“Fascist Germany tried to review the results of World War I, while the Soviet Union followed the communist ideology, the so-called world revolution. From this viewpoint, the world revolution could have been staged only by a war. The Soviet Union by definition was a state that considered the possibility of waging a large-scale war in order to achieve its goals, objectives and state ideology. This way, Europe was doomed to a new war and this started on September 1, 1939, when Nazi Germany attacked Poland. But that attack occurred when a new configuration of military-political alliances appeared in Europe. That war became possible because the famous Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact was signed in Moscow on August 23, 1939,” stated Anatol Țăranu. He noted that following that agreement between two great totalitarian powers, World War II started and that was the biggest war in the history of mankind.
University lecturer Marin Gherman, director of the Institute of Political Studies and Social Capital of Chernivtsi, an associate of “Ștefan cel Mare” University of Suceava, said the political communication model of that period was very different from that of the contemporary period. Then, a lot of media outlets appeared and developed. “As they say, there is no difference between mass communication and propaganda. Then they counted a lot on censorship, on what we called closure of the information area, on the promotion of clear messages: what didn’t suit the ideological system wasn’t said and what was said was controlled. We speak about two totalitarian systems that controlled everything. They started with control in the family and ended with mass communication,” stated Marin Gherman.
According to him, propaganda justified the necessity of invading other territories. The invasion of other territories and the acts of aggression were presented as steps needed for liberation. The crimes committed in that war were presented as heroic deeds requested by those who were “liberated”. “The ideological systems were built differently. The Soviet Union was based on clear concepts of extension of the revolution and the necessity of extending socialism and communism onto the other states, while Hitler was dominated by other ideological constructs. We should not forget that namely in the time of Nazi Germany, the Ministry of Truth, about which we know from history, and the notion of propaganda appeared,” explained Marin Gherman.
He also said that the two states were on friendly terms and looked at each other as at future dominators and masters of the world. “This ideological, propagandistic construct that is used now too, about dark Nazism and the liberation of mankind from Nazism, appeared much later, in the context of the second stage of World War II, when the two states got into a direct conflict,” said Marin Gherman.
The public debate entitled “Who started World War II and why? Propaganda myths as a source of nostalgia for the USSR” was the sixth installment of the series of debates “100 years of USSR and 31 years without USSR: Nostalgia for Chimeras”. The project is implemented by IPN News Agency with support from the Hanns Seidel Foundation.
Antinostalgia
See related articles:
- War as state ideologeme of Putin’s Russia. Op-Ed by Anatol Țăranu
- In new times with new symbols, Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Centenary of collapsed empire. Brief guide for the nostalgic. Op-Ed by Anatol Țăranu
- Z0ZZ – Year of centenary and of efforts to restore USSR... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Octavian Țîcu: Moldova’s perspective is no other than European and alongside Romania
- Igor Sharov: Nostalgia for USSR can be cured by information and acknowledgement of history
- Why and how did USSR disappear? Why does it cause nostalgia yet? IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Triumphal march of the pro-Soviet nostalgic was interrupted after April 7, 2009 youth protests
- Marin Gherman: Nostalgia for USSR in Ukraine is at lower level than in Moldova
- Igor Boțan: Government will be helped if it fulfills commitments
- Why did USSR appear and how did it work? Why does it cause nostalgia yet? IPN debate
- Virgiliu Pâslariuc: USSR collapsed, but post-Soviet space remained media and energy colony of Russia
- Russian world as substitute for USSR. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Day of betrayal and nostalgia... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Igor Boțan: Kremlin’s mistakes in relation to Ukraine are total
- Valentin Dolganiuc: Moldovans are not nostalgic for USSR; they are victims of propaganda
- Arcadie Barbăroșie: I think Moldova will ultimately unite with Romania
- Evolution of Russia’s aggression against Ukraine and its influence on nostalgia for USSR. IPN debate
- Nostalgia ahead of apogee. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Holodomor and Ukrainian identity construct. Lesson for Moldova. Op-Ed by Anatol Țăranu
- Historian Virgiliu Bîrlădeanu: Anti-Soviet resistance was platform that ensured changes
- Virgiliu Bîrlădeanu: Governments kept indifferent attitude to anti-communist resistance movement
- Anti-communist resistance movements created platforms for national renaissance
- Strange manifestations of nostalgia... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Nostalgia for chimeras or whyt unionist project stagnates. Op-Ed by Anatol Țăranu
- Nostalgia for grandeur of empire. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Nostalgia for government of enemies of the people. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Neutrality as a status of vassalage of Moldova to Moscow. Op-Ed by Anatol Țăranu
- Nostalgia for red revolution... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Main enemy of nostalgia for USSR. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Anneli Ute Gabanyi: Before Fall of Berlin Wall, they didn’t speak about Red Army’s crimes in GDR
- Historian Virgiliu Bîrlădeanu: Bessarabians remember how they were thrown into minefields
- Igor Boțan: Russia takes revenge following destruction of myths it created
- Final stage of World War II: reality and myths about USSR’s and Anti-Hitler Alliance’s contribution. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: In this war, they use all kinds of weapons, including energy ones
- Nicolae Negru: Russian propaganda in Moldova exists due to political forces fueled by Russia
- Anatol Petrencu: Russia will be defeated and will pay reparations
- USSR’s participation in World War II: about real victories and defeats, about what propaganda does not say, about what myths and nostalgia reveal. IPN debate
- Failure of attempts to resuscitate nostalgic feelings. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Anatol Țăranu: Better life will eliminate any nostalgia for the past
- Marin Gherman: In Ukraine, the narrative of victory prevails
- Igor Boțan: Russia is going through a period of revanchism
- Soviet nostalgia resuscitates Romanophobia in Moldova. Op-Ed by Anatol Țăranu
- Valentin Constantinov: Dictators care only about personal power. IPN interview
- Distorted historical narrative as ideological weapon of Russian imperialism. Op-Ed by Anatol Țăranu
- Valentin Constantinov: Cult of Stalin’s personality was exposed in ten years
- Doctor of history: In Soviet period, propaganda hushed up repressive actions
- Valentin Constantinov: The further we are form Russia, the better we live
- Nostalgia for dictatorship and violence. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Unpolished reality about petty baton passed by red army to Putin’s army. Op-Ed by Anatol Țăranu
- Igor Boțan: Russia has always had imperialistic ambitions
- Col. (Ret) Andrei Covrig: Vladimir Putin aims to destroy Ukraine
- Valentin Constantinov: No dismemberment of empires occurred without wars
- Nostalgia for military grandeur of USSR as explanation for approval of current invasions. IPN debate
- Nostalgias for Soviet militia born out of NKVD, Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Protest of nostalgic serf. Op-Ed by Anatol Țăranu
- Nostalgia for voting without elections... Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Fatal price of Russian imperial nostalgia. Op-Ed by Anatol Țăranu
- Boris Negru: Dismemberment of USSR should be regarded as a rule as empires appear and disappear
- Anatol Petrencu: Russia today is not at all attractive
- Igor Boțan: Atrocities in Bucha are effects of propagandistic exploitation of Soviet nostalgia
- Basic human rights and freedoms in USSR: Myths and realities. IPN debate
- Amnesia and moral degradation of nostalgic Communists. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Russian and German models for learning lessons of history. Op-Ed by Anatol Țăranu
- Nostalgia at propaganda’s service. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Nostalgia after empire and Gagauz factor in Moldovan politics. Op-Ed by Anatol Țăranu
- Igor Boțan: Gorbachev didn’t focus on economic recovery and USSR disappeared
- Grigore Belostecinic: Gorbachev really wanted to save Soviet Union
- Anatol Țaranu: Soviet system was built based on element of terror
- Why are the nostalgic wrong when they attribute role of demolisher of USSR to Mikhail Gorbachev? IPN debate
- Mykhailo Podolyak: Cooperation of post-Soviet countries with Russia will harm them
- The Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact in the mirror of the Kremlin’s imperialistic nostalgia. Op-Ed by Anatol Țaranu
- Ukrainian TV channel: Russia will attempt to annex territories of five countries in autumn
- Facts beat nostalgia. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Nostalgia and the USSR centenary. Op-Ed by Victor Pelin
- Infarction and death of USSR. Birth of Soviet nostalgia. Op-Ed by Anatol Țăranu
- Anatol Petrecu: Nostalgic people should also accept hidden part about life in USSR. IPN interview
- Anatol Petrencu: We cannot accept aggressive policy of Russia
- Anatol Petrencu: Soviet Union was a state based on fear and blackmail
- Historian Anatol Petrencu: Those who are nostalgic for USSR idealize a criminal past
- Igor Boțan: There is clear evidence that famine of 1946-1947 in MSSR was organized
- Vasile Bumacov: Only agents of influence “believe” famine wasn’t organized
- Lidia Pădureac: Famine of 1946-1947 is a crime against humanity and does not have statute of limitations
- Was famine of MSSR of 1946-1947 organized or not? Could and wanted Soviet authorities to prevent devastating effects of this? IPN debate
- Iasi-Chisinau operation between Soviet nostalgia and Europeanization policy. Op-Ed by Anatol Țăranu
- 100 years of USSR and 31 years without USSR: Nostalgia for Chimeras. IPN debate
- Victor Juc: Bad state of affairs fuels nostalgia for earlier times
- Igor Boțan: We need a policy of communication on problems related to European course
- Rodica Ciobanu: We need to cultivate civic sprit of citizens