The repression of the totalitarian communist regime started together with the Red Terror and represented a set of punitive measures taken the Bolsheviks during the Russian Civil War of 1917-1922 against social groups declared class enemies and against persons accused of counterrevolutionary activities. On the current territory of the Republic of Moldova, the citizens from the left side of the Nistru were subject to this repression in the interwar period, but especially in 1937-1938, during the Stalinist Great Terror. The reasons and effects, the victims and executioners and the steps that need to be taken to keep the memory of the then victims and to prevent such phenomena were among the issues discussed by the experts invited to IPN’s public debate “Stalinist repression in MASSR and memory of victims of totalitarian communist regime”.
The permanent expert of IPN’s project Igor Boțan said that the repression was an instrument and method of intimidation against the anti-Bolshevik forces and against the population in general. The Bolsheviks broadly used the terror and violence against class enemies earlier, right before the issuing of the decree “On Red Terror” of September 5, 1918.
According to him, one of the ideologists and promoters of this policy, Felix Dzerzhinsky, defined “Red Terror” as the intimidation, arrest and destruction of enemies of the revolution on the basis of their class affiliation.
“The Red Terror is an episode of the general terror of the totalitarian communist regime. It had a determined and relatively limited period. In 1937-1938, it started formally with the appointment of Nikolai Yezhov as head of the NKVD, who issued the famous Order No. 00447 in July 1937, and ended in November 1938 with large-scale arrests, including of Yezhov and his protégés,” explained Igor Boțan.
He noted that this terror covered also the Moldavian Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic (MASSR), which was created by the Soviet authorities as part of Soviet Ukraine on October 12, 1924. It included the Transnistrian districts that currently form part of the Republic of Moldova and the districts of Odessa region of Ukraine. The given republic was created on the initiative of Grigory Kotovsky as an instrument for propagating communism in Bessarabia and the Balkans,” said the project’s expert.
Doctor of History Virgiliu Bîrlădeanu, head of the Contemporary History Section of the Institute of History of the Moldova State University, said the Moldavian Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic was created as a bridgehead to expand the proletarian and imperial revolution of Soviet Russia. In 1924, an initiative group was constituted to build such an autonomous republic. “Grigory Kotovsky played an important role in this group. By October 12, they decided to create this autonomous republic consisting of 11 districts, initially as part of the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic. It was later extended to cover 14 districts, with a territory of over 800,000 square meters. We have the data of the census of 1935, which show that the new entity included 582,000 persons and 31.6% of these were Moldovans, 45.5% were Ukrainians, 9% were Russians, 7% were Jews and a smaller percentage were Germans,” stated the university lecturer.
Virgiliu Bîrlădeanu said that in this period that lasted until August 2, 1940, when the entity created in 1924 was dismembered, the population of the region went through all the horrors of the Stalinist totalitarian regime, such as famine, collectivization, repression and communist terror. “These are the stages that marked the forced Sovietization of this territory and that were nothing but a general scenario applied by the administration from the Kremlin at all the peripheries of the Soviet Empire,” he stated.
In another development, the doctor of history said that after the Great Union, Bessarabia was integrated into Greater Romania and covered the stages typical of the whole country. First of all, it goes to the agrarian reform whose goal was to allot land to peasants and to create a class of peasants who could be included in a real economic circuit and in a free market. It also goes to the democratic elections of 1919, which were held for the first time as part of Greater Romania. Parties were formed and these integrated into the work of the administrative bodies of Romania.
“Bessarabia returned to a normal evolution cycle, to normality and it developed and became part of a European country. But we know that in 1940 this development was interrupted by the intervention of Soviet Russia and the annexation of Bessarabia,” stated Virgiliu Bîrlădeanu.
Doctor of History Mihai Țurcanu, of the Institute of History of the Moldova State University, said that terror and repression had existed in the Soviet Union since its creation. The fleeing of refugees from westward the Nistru to Bessarabia during the Russian Civil War is an issue that hasn’t been studied much. “Those refugees included tens of thousands of Jews. By a letter that is kept in the archives of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Romania, the great Rabin of Chisinau Țirelson addressed Daniel Ciugureanu, who then managed Bessarabia, and asked for assistance in the integration and helping of about 20,000 Jews who fled the pogroms witnessed then eastward the Nistru, which were conducted both by “white guards” and by the Red Army,” stated the historian.
According to him, the famine of 1921 followed as a component part of the systemic terror against the civil population in Soviet Russia, caused by the Soviet policy imposed by Lenin. “It goes to the forced requisition of food products for satisfying the needs of the Red Army and the urban centers on which the communist power depended during the years of the Civil War and that led to millions of victims. The most modest estimates show that the victims totaled about 1 million. The figure of 5 million victims is at the other extreme. This phenomenon was overcome only with international assistance, through the support offered by the United States through the agency of an American association that at a certain moment was feeding 12 million Russians daily. This support offered by the American Congress was stopped when they learned that the Soviets used that money to sign in secret contracts for the purchase of arms with Germany instead of feeding the own citizens. In the period, Lenin obliged the notable representatives of the Russian intellectuality who remained in the country to publicly ask for foreign support. He, as the leader of the Soviet Union, could not do this as in theory he was managing the happiest country, with the most satisfied and free population. He then shot dead those persons for having asked for support,” stated Mihai Țurcanu.
The historian noted that the period of industrialization and collectivization followed and this coincided with the passing to a peaceful epoch with relative welfare against what had been there earlier. The collectivization of 1927-1928, 1932-1933 was followed by the forced collectivization and the famine that accompanied this. The famine claimed millions of lives in Soviet Ukraine and on the territory of the then Moldavian Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic.
“The estimates put the figures at 18,000 to 35,000 victims in the MASSR. These were people who simply didn’t have what to eat and could not survive. Many of them tried to find refuge,” said Mihai Țurcanu.
The public debate entitled “Stalinist repression in MASSR and memory of victims of totalitarian communist regime” was the 25th installment of IPN’s project “Impact of the Past on Confidence and Peace Building Processes” which is supported by the Hanns Seidel Foundation of Germany.
Impactul trecutului
See related articles:
- 100 years under sign of MASSR. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Oppressive regime in Transnistrian region speculates on historical factors
- Alexandru Postica: Language problems and economic interests are persistent challenges in Transnistrian region
- Anatol Țăranu: Vulgar Moldovenism born in MASSR continues to live in Moldova’s realities
- Anneli Ute Gabanyi: Moldova has always been of great geostrategic importance for Russia
- Igor Boțan: Moldova’s biggest threat comes from disinformation campaigns
- Ion Valer Xenofontov: Ideas from secret protocol to Soviet-Nazi pact still used today
- Moldova from Ribbentrop-Molotov to Independence. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Soviet’s actions in relation to the Bessarabians in 1940 are ‘occupation” not “liberation”
- Historian Dumitru Lisnic: Soviets brought their own people to Bessarabia for administrative positions
- Anatol Petrencu: Soviets imposed their way of thinking and way of life in MSSR
- Ex-history teacher from Șerpeni: Village in 1944 was completely destroyed
- Effects of Iasi-Chisinau Operation 80 years later. IPN Debate
- Igor Boțan: Soviets’ 1940 actions in relation to Bessarabians were not “liberation”
- Anatol Țăranu: Annexation of Bessarabia on June 28, 1940 was an agreement between two dictators
- Day of June 28, 1940 between celebration and catastrophe. IPN Debate
- Andrei Curăraru: Deportations were aimed at creating society without values
- Lidia Pădureac: Soviet state committed crimes against humanity
- Alecu Reniță: Deportations must keep us vigilant and as far away as possible from Russia - a struggling monster
- Decapitation and uprooting of nation through deportations. IPN Debate
- Igor Boțan: Propaganda must be combated by imbedding critical thinking
- Nicolae Mihai: In totalitarian regimes, citizens no longer enjoy rights and freedoms
- Festive practices and identity engineering in (post)totalitarian regimes. IPN debate
- Virgiliu Bîrlădeanu: In Russia there is an authoritarian regime with totalitarian tendencies
- Igor Boțan: All legislatures in Moldova were pro-European or had periods when they promoted accession
- EU enlargement after collapse of USSR: causes and effects. Moldova’s lesson. IPN debate
- Andrei Curăraru: EU’s ambition is to become an important political center
- Anatol Petrencu: Collapse of Soviet Union was a triumph for countries annexed by force
- Cristian Manolachi: We must discern in avalanche of political messages. 2024 is a complicated election year
- Political mythologies in history and in actuality. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Political mythology in Ukraine war has been exploited to the maximum
- Virgiliu Bîrlădeanu: Authoritarian regimes are effective in disseminating propaganda
- Valentin Constantinov: Today we speak Romanian due to verticality of population of Bessarabia in 1812
- Igor Boțan: Literary language and official language are brought to highest level that unites us all
- Vasile Șoimaru: We are Romanians on both banks of the Prut
- Long path home of the Romanian language. IPN debate
- Statements about Russia terrorist attack: Terror breeds only terror
- Igor Boțan: Moldovan authorities must ensure communication with citizens from left bank of the Nistru
- Alexandru Cerbu about war of 1992: Bodies were lying on the streets in Tighina as in Bucha
- Victor Juc: The Nistru armed conflict was caused deliberately
- 32 years of an unfinished war. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Danger of repeat of horrors that society experienced under communist regime still exists
- Virgiliu Bîrlădeanu: We must detach ourselves from Soviet past and build a European society
- History, an international antidote to political repression. IPN debate
- Flori Bălănescu: In the absence of a Nuremberg-type trial, we cannot talk about condemnation of communism
- Alexandru Postica: Victims of political repression receive far too small recompence against terror they went through
- Role of history in forming person and modernizing society. IPN debate
- Igor Botan: You cannot build a future if you don’t know your past
- Ana Bîtcă: By informing students about political repression, we want to avoid repeat of past mistakes
- Igor Boțan: The Gulag was Bolsheviks’ solution for controlling population’s protest movement
- Ludmila Cojocaru: Soviet system meant repression, extermination, enslavement of population
- Lidia Pădureac: The Gulag was used to destroy people’s uprightness
- GULAG phenomenon: genesis, manifestation, lessons. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Budapest Memorandum would have been very important if those who signed it had considered it binding
- Radu Burduja: Ukraine must draw conclusions after signing Budapest Memorandum
- Ion Negrei: Russia no longer enjoys credibility internationally
- Failure of Budapest Memorandum. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Ukraine is key to final Transnistrian conflict settlement
- Natalia Albu: Frozen conflicts mean also a low level of quality of human life
- Octavian Țîcu: Moscow wants Moldova to be Transnistrized
- Frozen conflicts: genesis, dangers, settlement. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Phenomena that occurred in USSR before World War II were typical also for MASSR
- Virgiliu Bîrlădeanu: Thousands of people were executed only because they were regarded as a possible source of opposition
- Igor Boțan: To better understand how Union of 1918 occurred, we should analyze circumstances in which this occurred
- Alexandru Arseni: Governments in Chisinau and in Bucharest should recognize Union of 1918
- Ion Varta: After Russian Empire collapsed, Romanian national movement evolved into national liberation movement
- Great Union of 1918: lessons for past, present and future. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: When we speak about collapse of Constituent Assembly, we should consider consequences of this for Bessarabia
- Nicolae Enciu: Soviet society was constituted as an antipode of Western society
- Collapse of Constituent Assembly and of chance to democratize Soviet Russia. Effects on country and world. IPN debate
- Anatol Petrencu: In current Russia, there is no democracy
- Igor Boțan: Romania is also obliged to make effort for Moldova to manage to integrate into EU
- Alecu Reniță: Russia is a threat not only to ex-Soviet states, but also to whole Europe
- Igor Șarov: A continuous struggle is led to secure European integration desideratum
- European genealogy tree of Moldova. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Cold War ended because everyone realized what Soviet power actually was
- Ion Valer Xenofontov: Cold War lesson - to win with modesty and to lose with grace
- Anneli Ute Gabanyi: USSR wanted to impose same thinking system on people
- Lessons of Cold War. IPN debate
- Vitalie Stoian: Warsaw Part always intervened inside its borders, not outside them
- Anatol Țăranu: Warsaw Treaty was nothing else but “collective policeman”
- Igor Boțan: Warsaw Pact was a reply to reply
- Warsaw Pact: History without propaganda. IPN debate
- Radu Burduja: NATO was and will remain a successful alliance
- Igor Boțan: Soviet Union became totalitarian and wanted to conquer whole world
- Victor Juc: NATO enlargement occurs at request of states that consider themselves vulnerable
- NATO: History without propaganda. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Russians’ rhetoric on use of nuclear weapons shows that things go bad
- Pavel Moraru: Signing of Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact led to start of World War II
- Mihai Țurcanu: Russia wants to change international order by force
- Truth and lie about beginning of World War II. IPN debate
- Virgiliu Pâslariuc: European development model is a security and prosperity guarantee
- Price and effects of Independence. Comparative study (1877 vs. 1991. IPN debate
- Ion Varta: Russian factor was every time fateful for our national interest
- Igor Boțan: Role of intellectuality in obtaining Independence was prolific
- Ion Negrei: Putsch of October 1917 didn’t enjoy support among population of Bessarabia
- Igor Boțan: We are witnessing third stage of dismemberment of Soviet Union
- Marin Gherman: Communism was a catastrophe for previous century
- USSR: Born and Destroyed by Putsches. IPN debate
- Stalinization and de-Stalinization of Moldovan society. IPN debate
- Ludmila Cojocaru: Keeping memory of Stalinist crimes necessitates effort from state and society
- Igor Boțan: After Stalin’s death, Stalinization is only a kind of phantom
- Florin Abraham: Historical memory cannot be built without state support
- Igor Boțan: Stalinist elites devour each other, this being an essential quality of Stalinism
- Octavian Țîcu: Stalinization – imbedding of a series of features typical of Soviet Union
- Stalinization and de-Stalinization in European context. IPN debate
- Florin-Răzvan Mihai: Putinism poses a big threat
- Ion Manole: Passivity of international community to crimes of communism generated Ukraine war
- Kakhovka Dam: Why are laws and customs of war powerless? IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Possession of nuclear weapon makes Russia ignore international law norms
- Anatol Petrencu: Some nations fight without scruple
- Igor Boțan: Those who took part in deportation of people from Bessarabia were ideologically indoctrinated
- Viorica Olaru: The Kremlin administration is similar to the KGB
- “Stalinist deportations: echo of the past, for present and future”. IPN debate
- Alexandru Postica: Deportations should be treated in a broader context
- Mihail Druță: It is justified to celebrate Europe Day on May 9
- Anatol Țăranu: Moldova cannot become European state by keeping Soviet symbols
- Igor Boțan: It is a big mistake to reveal World War II events that suit only a particular side
- Victory Day: between reconciliation, antagonization and destabilization? IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Acknowledging organized famine is important for learning lessons
- Museographer of Avdarma: 800 people died from hunger in this village in 1946-1947
- Famine of 1946-1947. Vasile Șoimaru: People were dispossessed of everything and were murdered
- Lidia Pădureac: While Moldovan SSR was dying from starvation, Soviet Union was exporting grain
- Organized famine of 1946-1947: victims, murderers, memory. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Fascism, in its milder version, and Bolshevism were heresies of socialism
- Virgiliu Bîrlădeanu: Society should be attentive so as not to allow authoritarian-totalitarian deviations
- Alexandru Cosmescu: Fascism, Stalinism and Nazism created external enemies in order to achieve their goals
- What do Fascism, Nazism and Stalinism have in common? IPN debate
- Alecu Reniță on 1903 pogrom: Authorities failed to stop bloodshed
- Pogrom of 1903: executioners, victims and lessons. IPN debate
- Andrei Kushko: Not Moldovans, but imperial functionaries triggered Chisinau program
- Igor Boțan: Chisinau program was an outburst of anti-Semitism in Russian Empire
- Igor Boțan: Accession to EU is alternative to Russian world for Moldova
- Ion Negrei: Moldova should connect to European space for good
- Anatol Țăranu: There are affinities between aggressive policy of Russian empire and current regime of Putin
- Fate of peripheries of empires. Quo vadis, Moldova? IPN debate
- Mihai Țurcanu: “Stockholm syndrome” replaced feeling of national identity in many compatriots
- Igor Boțan: Putin’s drama is that he does not have ideology or economic force or army
- Maria Pilchin: Putin teaches his people to die because he was unable to teach them to live
- What did we celebrate and why did we celebrate on February 23? IPN debate