Press Release
on the organization of the debate ”Candidate status and irreversibility of European integration rely on society’s wish: What does this depend on in current conditions”. Public debates series held by the news agency IPN in its conference room with the support of the German Foundation “Hanns Seidel”
Held on 01 August 2022, Debate No.258 brought together: political commentator Nicolae Negru Mihai Mogîldea, team leader of the Europeanization Program at the Institute for European Policies and Reforms and Igor Boțan, IPN project’s standing expert.
The standing expert of IPN’s project Igor Boțan said that the power is a criterion of the political regime. Therefore, it is considered that there are pluralist, totalitarian or authoritarian and mixt political regimes. In Moldova, there is a pluralist political regime, but Moldova is considered a defective democracy. Therefore, it is very important to realize that democracy is an institutionalized freedom and the measurement is made in elections (parliamentary, presidential and local ones) that are ordinarily held once in four years.
“So, once in a year and a half, we can ask the citizens to state their opinion about the government, either we elect the President, Parliament or district councils as these, from political viewpoint, are the most representative ones,” explained the expert. The legitimacy of the power is the most important condition for ensuring the efficiency of a state institution according to several criteria – constitutional, electoral, and the legitimacy of the political power that represents the capacity of the state institutions to solve the political problems experienced by the citizens, etc. “All the things referring to legitimacy should be regarded as a whole from the angle of those legitimacy criteria to which I referred,” stated the expert.
Political commentator Nicolae Negru said the European integration, as the pro-Eastern one, is a strategic move of the Republic of Moldova, which depends on the decisions taken by the political class, state institutions and voters as well. But there are median voters who support the European integration, but swiftly choose the opposite direction on the first “stumbling block”. “This competition between the two ideas, two strategic directions makes the components – the government, the political class, the state of voters - be variable somehow,” stated Nicola Negru. According to him, the problem of problems resides in the method of perception between the “parallel universes” that exists everywhere in the world. Some of the politicians also migrate from one camp to another.
“How shall we deal with this isolation? What shall we do for the people not to live in parallel and to communicate? This is the problem of the problems. It seems to me that the Internet, the social networking sites can help now. But such a situation exists also in the European states and in the United States. The politicians try to work with these migrating voters, with these citizens for whom the policy orientation does not actually matter if it brings benefits,” stated Nicolae Negru.
Mihai Mogîldea, team leader of the Europeanization Program at the Institute for European Policies and Reforms, said the experience of the last few years shows that the foreign partners’ attitude depends on a number of factors, especially two factors – government and the parties’ and functionaries’ capacity to deliver results for the citizens, for developing and modernizing the country by developing relations with the foreign partners and the European Union.
“I think the second factor is related to the integrity of the administration as, either we want it or not, the relations of the European Union with the Republic of Moldova actually are considerably marked politically. The stimulus for developing this relationship is given by the European Union member states even if the role of the technocratic institutions in this process is important. It is very important that these EU heads of state and government trust a lot those who are responsible for the management of the state and of the whole decision-making process,” stated Mihai Mogîldea.
He noted that the credit of trust give to the current government a year ago was based on the integrity of these people who are responsible for governance. As a result, a dialog was initiated with the European partners and this brought important results for obtaining the EU candidate status. “We must be aware of the fact that besides the results expected by the EU in the implementation of the Association Agreement, on the nine conditions for opening accession negotiations, all these decisions refer also to the Republic of Moldova’s capacity to accelerate the process of modernizing and Europeanizing the country through the agency of political figures who are popular not only in the country, but also outside it,” said Mihai Mogîldea.
The Agency published 4 news stories on the debate (see the English version of www.ipn.md): on 01.08.22, „Candidate status and irreversibility of European integration rely on society’s wish: What does this depend on in current conditions? IPN debate”- https://www.ipn.md/en/candidate-status-and-irreversibility-of-european-integration-rely-on-society-8004_1091429.html; “Nicolae Negru: We will see real spirit of things when opposition invites people to protests”; https://www.ipn.md/en/nicolae-negru-we-will-see-real-spirit-of-things-when-8004_1091427.html; „Igor Boțan: European integration of Moldova is a legal and legitimate process” - https://www.ipn.md/en/igor-botan-european-integration-of-moldova-is-a-legal-and-8004_1091428.html; „Mihai Mogândea: To become involved, people need clear and assumed message”; https://www.ipn.md/en/mihai-mogandea-to-become-involved-people-need-clear-and-assumed-8004_1091433.html.
Valeriu Vasilica, director of IPN
