Moldovan society has differing opinions about a number of problems that are essential for life, including those related to the method of ensuring own security. The attitude to Moldova’s eventual accession to NATO as one of the possible solutions is relevant in this regard. Moreover, a large part of the population is against joining NATO even if there is a cruel war of aggression close to our country’s borders. Experts invited to IPN’s public debate “NATO: History without propaganda” discussed this “Moldovan dilemma”, making reference to the founding and development of this security alliance.
The permanent expert of IPN’s project Igor Boțan said the North Atlantic Treaty Organization is a political and military alliance that brings together 31 countries of Europe and North America. It was formed on April 4, 1949 with the aim of protecting Europe from the possible threat of Soviet expansion. Initially, 12 countries became NATO members: the U.S., Canada, Iceland, the UK, France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxemburg, Norway, Denmark, Italy, and Portugal.
“NATO is a transatlantic organization in which the allied states can consult each other about any problem that affects the vital interests of its members, including possible threats. NATO’s declared objective is to discourage and defend against aggression or attack on any NATO member state,” explained the expert.
According to him, NATO witnessed nine enlargement waves. Finland is the last member state that joined NATO, on April 4, 2023. At present, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Georgia, Ukraine and Sweden aspire to become member states of NATO. Another 19 states take part in the NATO Partnership for Peace Program, while another 15 countries take part in an institutionalized dialogue. “The total military costs of NATO the previous years represented approximately 57% of the global total. The members of the organization are obliged to use 2% of their annual GDP for defense problems,” noted Igor Boțan.
The expert also said that the NATO founding agreement has a key article – article 5 – which provides that if a NATO Ally is the victim of an armed attack, each and every other member of the Alliance will come to the aid of this. NATO aims to strengthen stability and to improve prosperity in the North Atlantic Region. The participating states combined forces to ensure collective defense and to maintain peace and security.
“NATO was founded to “to reject the Soviet threat”. This vision was modified in 2010, when the experience of involvement in international missions was witnessed. Since then, the active participation with modern defense has been the main concept, as well as three key missions of NATO – collective defense, crisis management and cooperative security. After the annexation of Crimea, NATO also made particular changes in its strategy, making it clear that the goal earlier was to discourage the Soviet aggression, while after the annexation of Crimea, the goal is to prevent “surprises” on behalf of Russia, which then announced its enlargement intention,” stated Igor Boțan
Victor Juc, director of the Institute of Legal, Political and Sociological Research of the Moldova State University, a corresponding member of the Academy of Sciences of Moldova, said that in the context of the ending of World War II in Europe, it seemed that peace and democracy would be established. “Fifty-seven wining states, plus another three, on April 25 founded the United National Organization and on April 26, 1945 adopted the United Nations Charter in which the opportunity for ensuring security, maintaining peace, democratization and development were stipulated expressly. But the bases for the partition of Europe were laid in Yalta and the former allies in World War II already became rivals,” stated Victor Juc.
According to him, the period of democratic cooperation lasted for less than two years and this made primarily the states of Western Europe to fear for their security as, in those times, the Red Army numbered about 8.3 million soldiers and was well equipped. This way, the Western Union Defense Organization was founded in 1948 as a political and military organization designed to ensure the security of European states. But those countries realized that without a partnership with the U.S., it was impossible to ensure their security.
“In that context, seven countries, mostly from the North Atlantic Region, formed the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, which is an intergovernmental organization anchored in the democratic principles of the rule of law and individual liberties, peace and security, which are considered very important values. Not at all accidentally, the Individual Partnership Action Plan with the Republic of Moldova also contains a lot of aspects regarding the democratic functioning of the state institutions,” noted the expert.
He also said that Article 4 of the Washington Treaty, which is often mentioned, is not less important. This refers to consultations between the member states. “From the start, the statutes of the North Atlantic Alliance stipulated that this will abide primarily by Article 51 of the United Nations Charter, which envisions the right to individual or collective self-defense of the states subject to aggression. So, from the beginning, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization declared its adherence to the principles of the United Nations Organization. However, in time the North Atlantic Treaty Organization became much more efficient than the United Nations Organizations,” stated Victor Juc.
Ex-secretary of state of the Ministry of Defense Radu Burduja, director of the Euro-Atlantic Institute for Building Resilience, said NATO was founded to prevent the expansion of the Soviet Union. At a certain moment, the European countries were confronted with a serious danger to which they could not find a military and defense response.
“That’s why they decided to form this security bloc. After this bloc was founded, it was surely extended. Turkey and Greece and later Spain joined it. There were incidents related to France, which decided to withdraw from the NATO military bodies and then returned. These internal conflicts, misunderstandings were resolved. Yes, in principle, the Alliance fulfilled its main goal of isolating the Soviet expansion. Several international incidents made so that the leaders of the free world realized that the Soviet Union indeed pursued expansionist goals. We can name here also the coup staged in Czechoslovakia. We can also speak about the Soviet Union’s very brutal interference in Hungary, when the rebellion there was suppressed. The Soviet Union’s very firm tendency to impose its influence through the Communist, Socialist parties in European countries, to install governments close to Moscow was obvious during the postwar years,” explained Radu Burduja.
According to him, those actions were accompanied by the use of force, which is against the NATO founding principles. “It goes to a direct conflict between democracy and autocracy. A government regime that was absolutely foreign to the democratic values to which the free countries tended was imposed. This fact led to several incidents in that period. In time, it was proven historically already that the concept of the Alliance since then up to now has been a correct one, based on correct principles and, owing to this, the longest and most successful Alliance has resisted,” noted the expert.
The public debate entitled “NATO: History without propaganda” was the 19th installment of IPN’s project “Impact of the Past on Confidence and Peace Building Processes” which is supported by the Hanns Seidel Foundation of Germany.
Impactul trecutului
See related articles:
- 100 years under sign of MASSR. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Oppressive regime in Transnistrian region speculates on historical factors
- Alexandru Postica: Language problems and economic interests are persistent challenges in Transnistrian region
- Anatol Țăranu: Vulgar Moldovenism born in MASSR continues to live in Moldova’s realities
- Anneli Ute Gabanyi: Moldova has always been of great geostrategic importance for Russia
- Igor Boțan: Moldova’s biggest threat comes from disinformation campaigns
- Ion Valer Xenofontov: Ideas from secret protocol to Soviet-Nazi pact still used today
- Moldova from Ribbentrop-Molotov to Independence. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Soviet’s actions in relation to the Bessarabians in 1940 are ‘occupation” not “liberation”
- Historian Dumitru Lisnic: Soviets brought their own people to Bessarabia for administrative positions
- Anatol Petrencu: Soviets imposed their way of thinking and way of life in MSSR
- Ex-history teacher from Șerpeni: Village in 1944 was completely destroyed
- Effects of Iasi-Chisinau Operation 80 years later. IPN Debate
- Igor Boțan: Soviets’ 1940 actions in relation to Bessarabians were not “liberation”
- Anatol Țăranu: Annexation of Bessarabia on June 28, 1940 was an agreement between two dictators
- Day of June 28, 1940 between celebration and catastrophe. IPN Debate
- Andrei Curăraru: Deportations were aimed at creating society without values
- Lidia Pădureac: Soviet state committed crimes against humanity
- Alecu Reniță: Deportations must keep us vigilant and as far away as possible from Russia - a struggling monster
- Decapitation and uprooting of nation through deportations. IPN Debate
- Igor Boțan: Propaganda must be combated by imbedding critical thinking
- Nicolae Mihai: In totalitarian regimes, citizens no longer enjoy rights and freedoms
- Festive practices and identity engineering in (post)totalitarian regimes. IPN debate
- Virgiliu Bîrlădeanu: In Russia there is an authoritarian regime with totalitarian tendencies
- Igor Boțan: All legislatures in Moldova were pro-European or had periods when they promoted accession
- EU enlargement after collapse of USSR: causes and effects. Moldova’s lesson. IPN debate
- Andrei Curăraru: EU’s ambition is to become an important political center
- Anatol Petrencu: Collapse of Soviet Union was a triumph for countries annexed by force
- Cristian Manolachi: We must discern in avalanche of political messages. 2024 is a complicated election year
- Political mythologies in history and in actuality. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Political mythology in Ukraine war has been exploited to the maximum
- Virgiliu Bîrlădeanu: Authoritarian regimes are effective in disseminating propaganda
- Valentin Constantinov: Today we speak Romanian due to verticality of population of Bessarabia in 1812
- Igor Boțan: Literary language and official language are brought to highest level that unites us all
- Vasile Șoimaru: We are Romanians on both banks of the Prut
- Long path home of the Romanian language. IPN debate
- Statements about Russia terrorist attack: Terror breeds only terror
- Igor Boțan: Moldovan authorities must ensure communication with citizens from left bank of the Nistru
- Alexandru Cerbu about war of 1992: Bodies were lying on the streets in Tighina as in Bucha
- Victor Juc: The Nistru armed conflict was caused deliberately
- 32 years of an unfinished war. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Danger of repeat of horrors that society experienced under communist regime still exists
- Virgiliu Bîrlădeanu: We must detach ourselves from Soviet past and build a European society
- History, an international antidote to political repression. IPN debate
- Flori Bălănescu: In the absence of a Nuremberg-type trial, we cannot talk about condemnation of communism
- Alexandru Postica: Victims of political repression receive far too small recompence against terror they went through
- Role of history in forming person and modernizing society. IPN debate
- Igor Botan: You cannot build a future if you don’t know your past
- Ana Bîtcă: By informing students about political repression, we want to avoid repeat of past mistakes
- Igor Boțan: The Gulag was Bolsheviks’ solution for controlling population’s protest movement
- Ludmila Cojocaru: Soviet system meant repression, extermination, enslavement of population
- Lidia Pădureac: The Gulag was used to destroy people’s uprightness
- GULAG phenomenon: genesis, manifestation, lessons. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Budapest Memorandum would have been very important if those who signed it had considered it binding
- Radu Burduja: Ukraine must draw conclusions after signing Budapest Memorandum
- Ion Negrei: Russia no longer enjoys credibility internationally
- Failure of Budapest Memorandum. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Ukraine is key to final Transnistrian conflict settlement
- Natalia Albu: Frozen conflicts mean also a low level of quality of human life
- Octavian Țîcu: Moscow wants Moldova to be Transnistrized
- Frozen conflicts: genesis, dangers, settlement. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Phenomena that occurred in USSR before World War II were typical also for MASSR
- Virgiliu Bîrlădeanu: Thousands of people were executed only because they were regarded as a possible source of opposition
- Stalinist repression in MASSR and memory of victims of totalitarian communist regime. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: To better understand how Union of 1918 occurred, we should analyze circumstances in which this occurred
- Alexandru Arseni: Governments in Chisinau and in Bucharest should recognize Union of 1918
- Ion Varta: After Russian Empire collapsed, Romanian national movement evolved into national liberation movement
- Great Union of 1918: lessons for past, present and future. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: When we speak about collapse of Constituent Assembly, we should consider consequences of this for Bessarabia
- Nicolae Enciu: Soviet society was constituted as an antipode of Western society
- Collapse of Constituent Assembly and of chance to democratize Soviet Russia. Effects on country and world. IPN debate
- Anatol Petrencu: In current Russia, there is no democracy
- Igor Boțan: Romania is also obliged to make effort for Moldova to manage to integrate into EU
- Alecu Reniță: Russia is a threat not only to ex-Soviet states, but also to whole Europe
- Igor Șarov: A continuous struggle is led to secure European integration desideratum
- European genealogy tree of Moldova. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Cold War ended because everyone realized what Soviet power actually was
- Ion Valer Xenofontov: Cold War lesson - to win with modesty and to lose with grace
- Anneli Ute Gabanyi: USSR wanted to impose same thinking system on people
- Lessons of Cold War. IPN debate
- Vitalie Stoian: Warsaw Part always intervened inside its borders, not outside them
- Anatol Țăranu: Warsaw Treaty was nothing else but “collective policeman”
- Igor Boțan: Warsaw Pact was a reply to reply
- Warsaw Pact: History without propaganda. IPN debate
- Radu Burduja: NATO was and will remain a successful alliance
- Igor Boțan: Soviet Union became totalitarian and wanted to conquer whole world
- Victor Juc: NATO enlargement occurs at request of states that consider themselves vulnerable
- Igor Boțan: Russians’ rhetoric on use of nuclear weapons shows that things go bad
- Pavel Moraru: Signing of Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact led to start of World War II
- Mihai Țurcanu: Russia wants to change international order by force
- Truth and lie about beginning of World War II. IPN debate
- Virgiliu Pâslariuc: European development model is a security and prosperity guarantee
- Price and effects of Independence. Comparative study (1877 vs. 1991. IPN debate
- Ion Varta: Russian factor was every time fateful for our national interest
- Igor Boțan: Role of intellectuality in obtaining Independence was prolific
- Ion Negrei: Putsch of October 1917 didn’t enjoy support among population of Bessarabia
- Igor Boțan: We are witnessing third stage of dismemberment of Soviet Union
- Marin Gherman: Communism was a catastrophe for previous century
- USSR: Born and Destroyed by Putsches. IPN debate
- Stalinization and de-Stalinization of Moldovan society. IPN debate
- Ludmila Cojocaru: Keeping memory of Stalinist crimes necessitates effort from state and society
- Igor Boțan: After Stalin’s death, Stalinization is only a kind of phantom
- Florin Abraham: Historical memory cannot be built without state support
- Igor Boțan: Stalinist elites devour each other, this being an essential quality of Stalinism
- Octavian Țîcu: Stalinization – imbedding of a series of features typical of Soviet Union
- Stalinization and de-Stalinization in European context. IPN debate
- Florin-Răzvan Mihai: Putinism poses a big threat
- Ion Manole: Passivity of international community to crimes of communism generated Ukraine war
- Kakhovka Dam: Why are laws and customs of war powerless? IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Possession of nuclear weapon makes Russia ignore international law norms
- Anatol Petrencu: Some nations fight without scruple
- Igor Boțan: Those who took part in deportation of people from Bessarabia were ideologically indoctrinated
- Viorica Olaru: The Kremlin administration is similar to the KGB
- “Stalinist deportations: echo of the past, for present and future”. IPN debate
- Alexandru Postica: Deportations should be treated in a broader context
- Mihail Druță: It is justified to celebrate Europe Day on May 9
- Anatol Țăranu: Moldova cannot become European state by keeping Soviet symbols
- Igor Boțan: It is a big mistake to reveal World War II events that suit only a particular side
- Victory Day: between reconciliation, antagonization and destabilization? IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Acknowledging organized famine is important for learning lessons
- Museographer of Avdarma: 800 people died from hunger in this village in 1946-1947
- Famine of 1946-1947. Vasile Șoimaru: People were dispossessed of everything and were murdered
- Lidia Pădureac: While Moldovan SSR was dying from starvation, Soviet Union was exporting grain
- Organized famine of 1946-1947: victims, murderers, memory. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Fascism, in its milder version, and Bolshevism were heresies of socialism
- Virgiliu Bîrlădeanu: Society should be attentive so as not to allow authoritarian-totalitarian deviations
- Alexandru Cosmescu: Fascism, Stalinism and Nazism created external enemies in order to achieve their goals
- What do Fascism, Nazism and Stalinism have in common? IPN debate
- Alecu Reniță on 1903 pogrom: Authorities failed to stop bloodshed
- Pogrom of 1903: executioners, victims and lessons. IPN debate
- Andrei Kushko: Not Moldovans, but imperial functionaries triggered Chisinau program
- Igor Boțan: Chisinau program was an outburst of anti-Semitism in Russian Empire
- Igor Boțan: Accession to EU is alternative to Russian world for Moldova
- Ion Negrei: Moldova should connect to European space for good
- Anatol Țăranu: There are affinities between aggressive policy of Russian empire and current regime of Putin
- Fate of peripheries of empires. Quo vadis, Moldova? IPN debate
- Mihai Țurcanu: “Stockholm syndrome” replaced feeling of national identity in many compatriots
- Igor Boțan: Putin’s drama is that he does not have ideology or economic force or army
- Maria Pilchin: Putin teaches his people to die because he was unable to teach them to live
- What did we celebrate and why did we celebrate on February 23? IPN debate