Recently, the Constitutional Court adopted a decision confirming the correct name of the official language of the Republic of Moldova, which is “the Romanian language based on the Latin script”. It is an important document that allowed the Romanian language, figuratively speaking, “to get home” after 30 years of wandering under foreign names and faces such as the “Moldovan language”, “official language” or “our language”. Apparently, from a legal point of view, clarity and justice were ensured, but this does not mean that other divergences over the name of the language will no longer exist, either in society as a whole or within the political class. The components, reasons, effects of these divergences and also the possible solutions that can help reach a social and, perhaps, political consensus in this regard were among the issues discussed by the experts invited to IPN’s public debate “The long path home of the Romanian language”.
The permanent expert of IPN’s project Igor Boțan said that the language is a communication system made up of articulated sounds, specific to people, through which these express their thoughts, feelings and desires. The national language of a country is the language spoken by the majority of the people, but this does not necessarily have to be the official language, although this happens most of the times. A dialect is the form of a language spoken in a particular area, whose phonetic, lexical, grammatical characteristic features distinguish it from the common language of the whole people and from other local forms of the same language.
“The literary language is the well-ordered, normed and cultivated form of a national language. The literary language forms a super variant of the national language, characterized by a system of norms fixed in writing, which ensures certain unity and stability, as well as its cultivated character. The literary language has a wide scope of operation, encompassing cultural productions and manifestations in the broad sense of the word. The literary language is the language of scientific, philosophical, belletristic writings. It is the language of the press and political life, as well as the language used in different institutions: administration, school, theater, church, etc.,” explained the expert.
In the same connection, Igor Boțan referred to the remark of Antonio Gramsci, a well-known theorist of the so-called cultural Marxism: “Whoever speaks in a dialect or patois, not knowing a literary language, is, naturally, at a level of limited and provincial culture. A great culture can only be translated into another language of culture of a great culture, but not into a dialect or patois”.
Referring to the notions for the people, the expert said that it is a historical form of human community, superior to the tribe and prior to the nation, whose members live on the same territory, speak the same language and have the same cultural tradition. On the other hand, the nation is the human community characterized by unity of territory, consciousness of historical and cultural identity and, in general, unity of language and religion, usually within the same political-legal framework.
MP of the Party of Action and Solidarity (PAS) Vasile Șoimaru, a signatory of the Declaration of Independence, said that the subject of language in society arose 35-37 years ago. After multiple “battles” in the Great National Assembly Square, with great difficulty, on August 31, 1989, the Law on the State Language and the Latin Alphabet was passed. Things didn’t stop there. Two years later, the Declaration of Independence was adopted, indicating the correct name of the language – the Romanian language. Later, in 1994, on June 27, the Constitution was adopted and serious debates were held in Parliament. However, the force that came up with another name of the language – the Moldovan language – won then.
“Things still continued. Three years ago, this young generation came and things were finally brought to an end. But those who for a lifetime speculated on what language they spoke woke up again. And if only they would speak it in the Moldovan form, as they call it, but they don’t speak it that way either, not even in Parliament. They always stop at this, at our correct ethnicity – that’s what they feared and, even though so many years have passed, they are still afraid,” said the MP.
“Now the Constitutional Court passed this ruling saying clearly to stop speculating so much on the Romanian language and the Moldovan language. Instead of stopping at social and economic issues, no, they take us back to the language issue. I don’t know how long this can last,” stated the PAS MP.
He made reference to several articles published decades ago, which note the correct name, the Latin alphabet. “And lo and behold, it has been going on and on. We defend the scientific argument, while they defend the lie. When are we going to get rid of this? I think never. They will die with this Stalinist argument, about the Moldovan language on this land. They write in Russian even in public spaces, in squares. It is a very bad example of mockery of the Romanian language and the Latin alphabet,” said Vasile Șoimaru.
Habilitated doctor of history Valentin Constantinov, senior scientific researcher at the Institute of History of the Moldova State University, said that the Republic of Moldova is the country where history and the historical discussion are always at the forefront.
“In medieval times, with the formation of independent Romanian states – in 1330 Wallachia and in 1365 Moldavia – these states, even if they remained vassals of the Kingdom of Hungary, they were independent. They defeated their overlord and even though they remained vassals, they were a kind of independent vassals. It was necessary to establish a princely chancellery for the government. The Middle Ages were the time of sacredness deriving from the biblical writings, where it is said that one cannot change the words spoken by the Savior. Greek, Latin and Hebrew are the first sacred languages. Two languages became stronger in the European space – Latin and Greek,” explained Valentin Constantinov.
According to him, this is the ideal aspect, but in the end the world is made up of people, who reach high executive positions. And where there are two people, there are usually three opinions. There was a disagreement between Constantinople, New Rome, and Old Rome. “In Old Rome, the language of worship, that of the Savior, was the sacred language. The Slavs agreed to be Christianized on condition that all the sacred books be translated into Slavonic. Thus, the language of worship, the Slavonic language, became the official language in the Romanian countries, given that we were under the extraordinary impact of Byzantine culture. But the majority population is Romanian, speaks the Romanian language. The Romanians have always called themselves Romanians, even if others called them Volokhs, Vlachs, etc.,” said the doctor of history.
“Why is the language Romanian? The language is Romanian and not Moldovan because Moldovan was spoken only in Moldavia, but the Romanian language is spoken also in Cluj, Bucharest, Timisoara and Maramures – territories that were not under the authority of the ruler of Moldavia. How did the term ‘Moldovan language’ become established? The country was called Moldova for 500 years – until 1859, when Alexandru Ioan Cuza was elected both in Iasi and Bucharest as the ruler of a new state, which the Romanians decided to call Romania. Being from Chisinau, if I meet tomorrow someone from Ilfov, Oltenia, Banat, Maramures, we will understand each other perfectly. And it’s probably hard to find a more unified language than Romanian. How was this unity secured? By the fact that the people circulated a lot,” said Valentin Constantinov.
The public debate entitled “The long path home of the Romanian language” was the 32nd installment of IPN’s project “Impact of the Past on Confidence and Peace Building Processes”, which is implemented with support from the Hanns Seidel Foundation.
Impactul trecutului
See related articles:
- 100 years under sign of MASSR. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Oppressive regime in Transnistrian region speculates on historical factors
- Alexandru Postica: Language problems and economic interests are persistent challenges in Transnistrian region
- Anatol Țăranu: Vulgar Moldovenism born in MASSR continues to live in Moldova’s realities
- Anneli Ute Gabanyi: Moldova has always been of great geostrategic importance for Russia
- Igor Boțan: Moldova’s biggest threat comes from disinformation campaigns
- Ion Valer Xenofontov: Ideas from secret protocol to Soviet-Nazi pact still used today
- Moldova from Ribbentrop-Molotov to Independence. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Soviet’s actions in relation to the Bessarabians in 1940 are ‘occupation” not “liberation”
- Historian Dumitru Lisnic: Soviets brought their own people to Bessarabia for administrative positions
- Anatol Petrencu: Soviets imposed their way of thinking and way of life in MSSR
- Ex-history teacher from Șerpeni: Village in 1944 was completely destroyed
- Effects of Iasi-Chisinau Operation 80 years later. IPN Debate
- Igor Boțan: Soviets’ 1940 actions in relation to Bessarabians were not “liberation”
- Anatol Țăranu: Annexation of Bessarabia on June 28, 1940 was an agreement between two dictators
- Day of June 28, 1940 between celebration and catastrophe. IPN Debate
- Andrei Curăraru: Deportations were aimed at creating society without values
- Lidia Pădureac: Soviet state committed crimes against humanity
- Alecu Reniță: Deportations must keep us vigilant and as far away as possible from Russia - a struggling monster
- Decapitation and uprooting of nation through deportations. IPN Debate
- Igor Boțan: Propaganda must be combated by imbedding critical thinking
- Nicolae Mihai: In totalitarian regimes, citizens no longer enjoy rights and freedoms
- Festive practices and identity engineering in (post)totalitarian regimes. IPN debate
- Virgiliu Bîrlădeanu: In Russia there is an authoritarian regime with totalitarian tendencies
- Igor Boțan: All legislatures in Moldova were pro-European or had periods when they promoted accession
- EU enlargement after collapse of USSR: causes and effects. Moldova’s lesson. IPN debate
- Andrei Curăraru: EU’s ambition is to become an important political center
- Anatol Petrencu: Collapse of Soviet Union was a triumph for countries annexed by force
- Cristian Manolachi: We must discern in avalanche of political messages. 2024 is a complicated election year
- Political mythologies in history and in actuality. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Political mythology in Ukraine war has been exploited to the maximum
- Virgiliu Bîrlădeanu: Authoritarian regimes are effective in disseminating propaganda
- Valentin Constantinov: Today we speak Romanian due to verticality of population of Bessarabia in 1812
- Igor Boțan: Literary language and official language are brought to highest level that unites us all
- Vasile Șoimaru: We are Romanians on both banks of the Prut
- Statements about Russia terrorist attack: Terror breeds only terror
- Igor Boțan: Moldovan authorities must ensure communication with citizens from left bank of the Nistru
- Alexandru Cerbu about war of 1992: Bodies were lying on the streets in Tighina as in Bucha
- Victor Juc: The Nistru armed conflict was caused deliberately
- 32 years of an unfinished war. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Danger of repeat of horrors that society experienced under communist regime still exists
- Virgiliu Bîrlădeanu: We must detach ourselves from Soviet past and build a European society
- History, an international antidote to political repression. IPN debate
- Flori Bălănescu: In the absence of a Nuremberg-type trial, we cannot talk about condemnation of communism
- Alexandru Postica: Victims of political repression receive far too small recompence against terror they went through
- Role of history in forming person and modernizing society. IPN debate
- Igor Botan: You cannot build a future if you don’t know your past
- Ana Bîtcă: By informing students about political repression, we want to avoid repeat of past mistakes
- Igor Boțan: The Gulag was Bolsheviks’ solution for controlling population’s protest movement
- Ludmila Cojocaru: Soviet system meant repression, extermination, enslavement of population
- Lidia Pădureac: The Gulag was used to destroy people’s uprightness
- GULAG phenomenon: genesis, manifestation, lessons. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Budapest Memorandum would have been very important if those who signed it had considered it binding
- Radu Burduja: Ukraine must draw conclusions after signing Budapest Memorandum
- Ion Negrei: Russia no longer enjoys credibility internationally
- Failure of Budapest Memorandum. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Ukraine is key to final Transnistrian conflict settlement
- Natalia Albu: Frozen conflicts mean also a low level of quality of human life
- Octavian Țîcu: Moscow wants Moldova to be Transnistrized
- Frozen conflicts: genesis, dangers, settlement. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Phenomena that occurred in USSR before World War II were typical also for MASSR
- Virgiliu Bîrlădeanu: Thousands of people were executed only because they were regarded as a possible source of opposition
- Stalinist repression in MASSR and memory of victims of totalitarian communist regime. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: To better understand how Union of 1918 occurred, we should analyze circumstances in which this occurred
- Alexandru Arseni: Governments in Chisinau and in Bucharest should recognize Union of 1918
- Ion Varta: After Russian Empire collapsed, Romanian national movement evolved into national liberation movement
- Great Union of 1918: lessons for past, present and future. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: When we speak about collapse of Constituent Assembly, we should consider consequences of this for Bessarabia
- Nicolae Enciu: Soviet society was constituted as an antipode of Western society
- Collapse of Constituent Assembly and of chance to democratize Soviet Russia. Effects on country and world. IPN debate
- Anatol Petrencu: In current Russia, there is no democracy
- Igor Boțan: Romania is also obliged to make effort for Moldova to manage to integrate into EU
- Alecu Reniță: Russia is a threat not only to ex-Soviet states, but also to whole Europe
- Igor Șarov: A continuous struggle is led to secure European integration desideratum
- European genealogy tree of Moldova. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Cold War ended because everyone realized what Soviet power actually was
- Ion Valer Xenofontov: Cold War lesson - to win with modesty and to lose with grace
- Anneli Ute Gabanyi: USSR wanted to impose same thinking system on people
- Lessons of Cold War. IPN debate
- Vitalie Stoian: Warsaw Part always intervened inside its borders, not outside them
- Anatol Țăranu: Warsaw Treaty was nothing else but “collective policeman”
- Igor Boțan: Warsaw Pact was a reply to reply
- Warsaw Pact: History without propaganda. IPN debate
- Radu Burduja: NATO was and will remain a successful alliance
- Igor Boțan: Soviet Union became totalitarian and wanted to conquer whole world
- Victor Juc: NATO enlargement occurs at request of states that consider themselves vulnerable
- NATO: History without propaganda. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Russians’ rhetoric on use of nuclear weapons shows that things go bad
- Pavel Moraru: Signing of Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact led to start of World War II
- Mihai Țurcanu: Russia wants to change international order by force
- Truth and lie about beginning of World War II. IPN debate
- Virgiliu Pâslariuc: European development model is a security and prosperity guarantee
- Price and effects of Independence. Comparative study (1877 vs. 1991. IPN debate
- Ion Varta: Russian factor was every time fateful for our national interest
- Igor Boțan: Role of intellectuality in obtaining Independence was prolific
- Ion Negrei: Putsch of October 1917 didn’t enjoy support among population of Bessarabia
- Igor Boțan: We are witnessing third stage of dismemberment of Soviet Union
- Marin Gherman: Communism was a catastrophe for previous century
- USSR: Born and Destroyed by Putsches. IPN debate
- Stalinization and de-Stalinization of Moldovan society. IPN debate
- Ludmila Cojocaru: Keeping memory of Stalinist crimes necessitates effort from state and society
- Igor Boțan: After Stalin’s death, Stalinization is only a kind of phantom
- Florin Abraham: Historical memory cannot be built without state support
- Igor Boțan: Stalinist elites devour each other, this being an essential quality of Stalinism
- Octavian Țîcu: Stalinization – imbedding of a series of features typical of Soviet Union
- Stalinization and de-Stalinization in European context. IPN debate
- Florin-Răzvan Mihai: Putinism poses a big threat
- Ion Manole: Passivity of international community to crimes of communism generated Ukraine war
- Kakhovka Dam: Why are laws and customs of war powerless? IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Possession of nuclear weapon makes Russia ignore international law norms
- Anatol Petrencu: Some nations fight without scruple
- Igor Boțan: Those who took part in deportation of people from Bessarabia were ideologically indoctrinated
- Viorica Olaru: The Kremlin administration is similar to the KGB
- “Stalinist deportations: echo of the past, for present and future”. IPN debate
- Alexandru Postica: Deportations should be treated in a broader context
- Mihail Druță: It is justified to celebrate Europe Day on May 9
- Anatol Țăranu: Moldova cannot become European state by keeping Soviet symbols
- Igor Boțan: It is a big mistake to reveal World War II events that suit only a particular side
- Victory Day: between reconciliation, antagonization and destabilization? IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Acknowledging organized famine is important for learning lessons
- Museographer of Avdarma: 800 people died from hunger in this village in 1946-1947
- Famine of 1946-1947. Vasile Șoimaru: People were dispossessed of everything and were murdered
- Lidia Pădureac: While Moldovan SSR was dying from starvation, Soviet Union was exporting grain
- Organized famine of 1946-1947: victims, murderers, memory. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Fascism, in its milder version, and Bolshevism were heresies of socialism
- Virgiliu Bîrlădeanu: Society should be attentive so as not to allow authoritarian-totalitarian deviations
- Alexandru Cosmescu: Fascism, Stalinism and Nazism created external enemies in order to achieve their goals
- What do Fascism, Nazism and Stalinism have in common? IPN debate
- Alecu Reniță on 1903 pogrom: Authorities failed to stop bloodshed
- Pogrom of 1903: executioners, victims and lessons. IPN debate
- Andrei Kushko: Not Moldovans, but imperial functionaries triggered Chisinau program
- Igor Boțan: Chisinau program was an outburst of anti-Semitism in Russian Empire
- Igor Boțan: Accession to EU is alternative to Russian world for Moldova
- Ion Negrei: Moldova should connect to European space for good
- Anatol Țăranu: There are affinities between aggressive policy of Russian empire and current regime of Putin
- Fate of peripheries of empires. Quo vadis, Moldova? IPN debate
- Mihai Țurcanu: “Stockholm syndrome” replaced feeling of national identity in many compatriots
- Igor Boțan: Putin’s drama is that he does not have ideology or economic force or army
- Maria Pilchin: Putin teaches his people to die because he was unable to teach them to live
- What did we celebrate and why did we celebrate on February 23? IPN debate