The Cold War is the name of the confrontation between the Soviet Union and the United States which occurred between March 5, 1946 and February 1, 1992. Despite the fact that this conflict is called war, no armed conflict happened between the parties. However, conflicts occurred in other countries and the USSR and the U.S. were an active part in these. Experts invited to IPN’s public debate “Lessons of Cold War” discussed the impact of that Cold War on the history of mankind, on the present and future of everyone given its continuous effects, its inheritance and lessons that should be learned.
The permanent expert of IPN’s project Igor Boțan said the Cold War was called cold because not even one armed battle occurred on the territories of the countries involved in that war, while the armies of the Soviet Union and the U.S. didn’t take part in an open clash against each other. The name “Cold War” was first used by writer George Orwell in 1945, after the explosion of two bombs in Japan. “The Cold War between the USSR and the U.S. was partially characterized by the production, proliferation and subsequent intimidation through the eventual use of nuclear weapons. But it does not go only to nuclear weapons as the essence of the war was to ensure uninterrupted armament also with other types of weapons, not only nuclear ones. The greater was a party arming itself, the more obvious were the threats” he stated.
The expert explained that the Cold War triggered the formation of opposite military alliances. This way, the creation of the North-Atlantic Alliance (NATO) was proclaimed on April 4, 1949. Beside the United States and neighboring Canada, this included a series of Europeans capitalist states, such as the UK, France, the Benelux countries, Norway, Iceland, Denmark, Italy, and Portugal. Also, a document was signed in Poland on May 14, 1955 to legalize the military-political union of the Socialist states, known as the Warsaw Pact. This included such states as the USSR, Poland, East Germany, Romania, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Albania, and Bulgaria. That agreement lasted until the end of the Cold War.
“It is formally considered that the starting point of the Cold War was the famous speech given in Fulton by ex-British Premier Winston Churchill, on March 5, 1946. In fact, the causes of the start of the Cold War were ideological, political and economic in character. If we refer to the ideological causes, the ideologies of the U.S. and the USSR were antagonist, while the ideology of the USSR was even expansionist. The pretention of expansionism caused actually the chase for armament, which was open and was led to show to the rival the power and the discouraging potential for the other side. As to the political causes, capitalist America and socialist Soviet Union feared the expansion of the mutual influence in the world and this expansion was used as a scarecrow,” stated Igor Boțan.
German political scientist Anneli Ute Gabanyi, senior research analyst at the Research Institute of Radio Free Europe in Munich and senior research associate at the German Institute for International and Security Issues in Berlin, considers the term “Cold War” appeared in 1938-1939. It referred to the Cold War that was being waged by Hitler on Poland before attacking this. Also, Poland’s allies, the U.S. and the UK, on the one side, and the Soviet Union, on the other side, started to divide the spheres of influence for the period after World War II when they were partners in their fight against Nazi Germany. “In October 1948, Churchill met with Stalin and calculated the percentages, which is the percentage the West will possess of Romania, Bulgaria, Hungary, etc., and the percentage the Soviet Union and the West will possess of Greece, which was very important for the UK,” explained Anneli Ute Gabanyi, author of recent history and security studies on Romania and the Republic of Moldova.
According to her, during the war, in January 1945, Stalin, in a conversation with a Yugoslavian political scientist and politician, said: ‘This war is not as all the other wars of the past. Where the armies of a state penetrate, that state imposes also its political and social system”. So, for the Soviet Union it was important from the start to create no only a particular kind of security around it, but to also surround itself with countries that had the same system and that didn’t threaten the social and political systems of the Soviet Union. When Russia started its war against Ukraine, some of the observers said that Russia, Moscow, Putin would not tolerate a democratic systems on its Western borders, which is in Ukraine.
Anneli Ute Gabanyi said the Soviet Union, demarcating the spheres of influence in which its satellite countries that didn’t choose the occupation or the regime were, gradually imposed a system on these, even an economic one, which never happened earlier in history. It was an absolutely unique system in the history of mankind.
Lecturer Ion Valer Xenofontov, doctor of history, said the name “Cold War” appeared back in the 14th century and is attributed to the regent of Castilla Juan Manuel, who said that it was a war between Christians and Moors. “Earlier, the hot wars had a clear start day and ended with a peace treaty, but the Cold War does not have a start and an end,” stated the doctor of history.
He made reference to Andre Fontaine’s fundamental work “History of the Cold War” in which the author reminded of the “Cold War” not after World War II, but after the Bolshevik coup of October 1917. “Then the world was split. That Bolshevik regime established on the ruins of the Russian Empire created a new society, a new vision, a new ideology, being antagonistic to other systems that existed at that moment,” he stated.
According to Ion Valer Xenofontov, it is known that the Western world was waiting to see the end of the civil war in Russia and recognized the Soviet Union only after it was clear that those who supported the Russian Empire lost ground and a new Bolshevik power was established. The West recognized the Soviet Union formed in 1922. The world was later split through the additional secret protocol of August 23, 1939. It was clearly seen how the Stalinist Soviet Union, together with Nazi Germany, divided the world into spheres of influence and the world became dichotomic.
Ion Valer Xenofontov also said that the name “Iron Curtain” is attributed to Nicolae Iorga who used this after the occupation of territories in the summer of 1940. He noted that an “Iron Curtain” appeared in Romania after Bessarabia, north Bukovina and Hertsa region were annexed by the Soviet Union.
The public debate entitled “Lessons of Cold War” was the 21st installment of IPN’s project “Impact of the Past on Confidence and Peace Building Processes” that is supported by the Hanns Seidel Foundation of Germany.
Impactul trecutului
See related articles:
- 100 years under sign of MASSR. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Oppressive regime in Transnistrian region speculates on historical factors
- Alexandru Postica: Language problems and economic interests are persistent challenges in Transnistrian region
- Anatol Țăranu: Vulgar Moldovenism born in MASSR continues to live in Moldova’s realities
- Anneli Ute Gabanyi: Moldova has always been of great geostrategic importance for Russia
- Igor Boțan: Moldova’s biggest threat comes from disinformation campaigns
- Ion Valer Xenofontov: Ideas from secret protocol to Soviet-Nazi pact still used today
- Moldova from Ribbentrop-Molotov to Independence. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Soviet’s actions in relation to the Bessarabians in 1940 are ‘occupation” not “liberation”
- Historian Dumitru Lisnic: Soviets brought their own people to Bessarabia for administrative positions
- Anatol Petrencu: Soviets imposed their way of thinking and way of life in MSSR
- Ex-history teacher from Șerpeni: Village in 1944 was completely destroyed
- Effects of Iasi-Chisinau Operation 80 years later. IPN Debate
- Igor Boțan: Soviets’ 1940 actions in relation to Bessarabians were not “liberation”
- Anatol Țăranu: Annexation of Bessarabia on June 28, 1940 was an agreement between two dictators
- Day of June 28, 1940 between celebration and catastrophe. IPN Debate
- Andrei Curăraru: Deportations were aimed at creating society without values
- Lidia Pădureac: Soviet state committed crimes against humanity
- Alecu Reniță: Deportations must keep us vigilant and as far away as possible from Russia - a struggling monster
- Decapitation and uprooting of nation through deportations. IPN Debate
- Igor Boțan: Propaganda must be combated by imbedding critical thinking
- Nicolae Mihai: In totalitarian regimes, citizens no longer enjoy rights and freedoms
- Festive practices and identity engineering in (post)totalitarian regimes. IPN debate
- Virgiliu Bîrlădeanu: In Russia there is an authoritarian regime with totalitarian tendencies
- Igor Boțan: All legislatures in Moldova were pro-European or had periods when they promoted accession
- EU enlargement after collapse of USSR: causes and effects. Moldova’s lesson. IPN debate
- Andrei Curăraru: EU’s ambition is to become an important political center
- Anatol Petrencu: Collapse of Soviet Union was a triumph for countries annexed by force
- Cristian Manolachi: We must discern in avalanche of political messages. 2024 is a complicated election year
- Political mythologies in history and in actuality. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Political mythology in Ukraine war has been exploited to the maximum
- Virgiliu Bîrlădeanu: Authoritarian regimes are effective in disseminating propaganda
- Valentin Constantinov: Today we speak Romanian due to verticality of population of Bessarabia in 1812
- Igor Boțan: Literary language and official language are brought to highest level that unites us all
- Vasile Șoimaru: We are Romanians on both banks of the Prut
- Long path home of the Romanian language. IPN debate
- Statements about Russia terrorist attack: Terror breeds only terror
- Igor Boțan: Moldovan authorities must ensure communication with citizens from left bank of the Nistru
- Alexandru Cerbu about war of 1992: Bodies were lying on the streets in Tighina as in Bucha
- Victor Juc: The Nistru armed conflict was caused deliberately
- 32 years of an unfinished war. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Danger of repeat of horrors that society experienced under communist regime still exists
- Virgiliu Bîrlădeanu: We must detach ourselves from Soviet past and build a European society
- History, an international antidote to political repression. IPN debate
- Flori Bălănescu: In the absence of a Nuremberg-type trial, we cannot talk about condemnation of communism
- Alexandru Postica: Victims of political repression receive far too small recompence against terror they went through
- Role of history in forming person and modernizing society. IPN debate
- Igor Botan: You cannot build a future if you don’t know your past
- Ana Bîtcă: By informing students about political repression, we want to avoid repeat of past mistakes
- Igor Boțan: The Gulag was Bolsheviks’ solution for controlling population’s protest movement
- Ludmila Cojocaru: Soviet system meant repression, extermination, enslavement of population
- Lidia Pădureac: The Gulag was used to destroy people’s uprightness
- GULAG phenomenon: genesis, manifestation, lessons. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Budapest Memorandum would have been very important if those who signed it had considered it binding
- Radu Burduja: Ukraine must draw conclusions after signing Budapest Memorandum
- Ion Negrei: Russia no longer enjoys credibility internationally
- Failure of Budapest Memorandum. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Ukraine is key to final Transnistrian conflict settlement
- Natalia Albu: Frozen conflicts mean also a low level of quality of human life
- Octavian Țîcu: Moscow wants Moldova to be Transnistrized
- Frozen conflicts: genesis, dangers, settlement. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Phenomena that occurred in USSR before World War II were typical also for MASSR
- Virgiliu Bîrlădeanu: Thousands of people were executed only because they were regarded as a possible source of opposition
- Stalinist repression in MASSR and memory of victims of totalitarian communist regime. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: To better understand how Union of 1918 occurred, we should analyze circumstances in which this occurred
- Alexandru Arseni: Governments in Chisinau and in Bucharest should recognize Union of 1918
- Ion Varta: After Russian Empire collapsed, Romanian national movement evolved into national liberation movement
- Great Union of 1918: lessons for past, present and future. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: When we speak about collapse of Constituent Assembly, we should consider consequences of this for Bessarabia
- Nicolae Enciu: Soviet society was constituted as an antipode of Western society
- Collapse of Constituent Assembly and of chance to democratize Soviet Russia. Effects on country and world. IPN debate
- Anatol Petrencu: In current Russia, there is no democracy
- Igor Boțan: Romania is also obliged to make effort for Moldova to manage to integrate into EU
- Alecu Reniță: Russia is a threat not only to ex-Soviet states, but also to whole Europe
- Igor Șarov: A continuous struggle is led to secure European integration desideratum
- European genealogy tree of Moldova. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Cold War ended because everyone realized what Soviet power actually was
- Ion Valer Xenofontov: Cold War lesson - to win with modesty and to lose with grace
- Anneli Ute Gabanyi: USSR wanted to impose same thinking system on people
- Vitalie Stoian: Warsaw Part always intervened inside its borders, not outside them
- Anatol Țăranu: Warsaw Treaty was nothing else but “collective policeman”
- Igor Boțan: Warsaw Pact was a reply to reply
- Warsaw Pact: History without propaganda. IPN debate
- Radu Burduja: NATO was and will remain a successful alliance
- Igor Boțan: Soviet Union became totalitarian and wanted to conquer whole world
- Victor Juc: NATO enlargement occurs at request of states that consider themselves vulnerable
- NATO: History without propaganda. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Russians’ rhetoric on use of nuclear weapons shows that things go bad
- Pavel Moraru: Signing of Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact led to start of World War II
- Mihai Țurcanu: Russia wants to change international order by force
- Truth and lie about beginning of World War II. IPN debate
- Virgiliu Pâslariuc: European development model is a security and prosperity guarantee
- Price and effects of Independence. Comparative study (1877 vs. 1991. IPN debate
- Ion Varta: Russian factor was every time fateful for our national interest
- Igor Boțan: Role of intellectuality in obtaining Independence was prolific
- Ion Negrei: Putsch of October 1917 didn’t enjoy support among population of Bessarabia
- Igor Boțan: We are witnessing third stage of dismemberment of Soviet Union
- Marin Gherman: Communism was a catastrophe for previous century
- USSR: Born and Destroyed by Putsches. IPN debate
- Stalinization and de-Stalinization of Moldovan society. IPN debate
- Ludmila Cojocaru: Keeping memory of Stalinist crimes necessitates effort from state and society
- Igor Boțan: After Stalin’s death, Stalinization is only a kind of phantom
- Florin Abraham: Historical memory cannot be built without state support
- Igor Boțan: Stalinist elites devour each other, this being an essential quality of Stalinism
- Octavian Țîcu: Stalinization – imbedding of a series of features typical of Soviet Union
- Stalinization and de-Stalinization in European context. IPN debate
- Florin-Răzvan Mihai: Putinism poses a big threat
- Ion Manole: Passivity of international community to crimes of communism generated Ukraine war
- Kakhovka Dam: Why are laws and customs of war powerless? IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Possession of nuclear weapon makes Russia ignore international law norms
- Anatol Petrencu: Some nations fight without scruple
- Igor Boțan: Those who took part in deportation of people from Bessarabia were ideologically indoctrinated
- Viorica Olaru: The Kremlin administration is similar to the KGB
- “Stalinist deportations: echo of the past, for present and future”. IPN debate
- Alexandru Postica: Deportations should be treated in a broader context
- Mihail Druță: It is justified to celebrate Europe Day on May 9
- Anatol Țăranu: Moldova cannot become European state by keeping Soviet symbols
- Igor Boțan: It is a big mistake to reveal World War II events that suit only a particular side
- Victory Day: between reconciliation, antagonization and destabilization? IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Acknowledging organized famine is important for learning lessons
- Museographer of Avdarma: 800 people died from hunger in this village in 1946-1947
- Famine of 1946-1947. Vasile Șoimaru: People were dispossessed of everything and were murdered
- Lidia Pădureac: While Moldovan SSR was dying from starvation, Soviet Union was exporting grain
- Organized famine of 1946-1947: victims, murderers, memory. IPN debate
- Igor Boțan: Fascism, in its milder version, and Bolshevism were heresies of socialism
- Virgiliu Bîrlădeanu: Society should be attentive so as not to allow authoritarian-totalitarian deviations
- Alexandru Cosmescu: Fascism, Stalinism and Nazism created external enemies in order to achieve their goals
- What do Fascism, Nazism and Stalinism have in common? IPN debate
- Alecu Reniță on 1903 pogrom: Authorities failed to stop bloodshed
- Pogrom of 1903: executioners, victims and lessons. IPN debate
- Andrei Kushko: Not Moldovans, but imperial functionaries triggered Chisinau program
- Igor Boțan: Chisinau program was an outburst of anti-Semitism in Russian Empire
- Igor Boțan: Accession to EU is alternative to Russian world for Moldova
- Ion Negrei: Moldova should connect to European space for good
- Anatol Țăranu: There are affinities between aggressive policy of Russian empire and current regime of Putin
- Fate of peripheries of empires. Quo vadis, Moldova? IPN debate
- Mihai Țurcanu: “Stockholm syndrome” replaced feeling of national identity in many compatriots
- Igor Boțan: Putin’s drama is that he does not have ideology or economic force or army
- Maria Pilchin: Putin teaches his people to die because he was unable to teach them to live
- What did we celebrate and why did we celebrate on February 23? IPN debate