Collective memory is a strategic tool in the Russian Federation’s arsenal of influence, and the Republic of Moldova, with its complex history and geopolitical position, is a prime target for the manipulation of the past for political purposes. This is the view of historian Virgiliu Birladeanu, expressed during a video interview conducted by IPN News Agency on the topic "Collective Memory - A Battlefield of Hybrid Warfare Against the Republic of Moldova".

According to the head of the Contemporary History Section at the Institute of History of Moldova State University, Russia uses collective memory as a means of influencing public opinion both domestically and internationally, in order to strengthen its political and geopolitical position. By promoting specific historical narratives, Russia manipulates the perception of past events.

"The Russian Federation’s interest in the practices and policies of memory in the Republic of Moldova stems from the fact that collective memory is a strategic tool in its arsenal of influence. Given Moldova’s complex history and geopolitical position, it represents a sensitive and favorable ground for the manipulation of the past for political purposes," stated historian Virgiliu Birladeanu.

Furthermore, Birladeanu argues that Russia does not treat history merely as an academic or cultural field but as a strategic means of influence. By promoting a particular version of the past - one that glorifies the USSR, justifies Russia’s actions in the region, and downplays the negative aspects of Soviet rule - the Kremlin seeks to maintain its influence in the former Soviet republics.

"For Russia, controlling historical narratives is not just a matter of cultural prestige or 'historical truth' but primarily a form of soft power that helps maintain influence in the former Soviet space and obstructs processes of identity emancipation and European integration. When Moldova attempts to critically reassess its past, reclaim its national memory, and align itself with democratic values, Moscow perceives this as a threat to the geopolitical project of the so-called 'Russian World,'" Birladeanu added.

The historian explained that Russia uses historical symbols and past events to influence and divide societies, particularly in former Soviet republics such as Moldova. In this context, Russia employs monuments, commemorations, and historical figures to construct a narrative that serves its political interests.

"Russia exploits the symbols of the past—monuments, anniversaries, historical figures—to create divisions in society, delegitimize the actions of authorities, and propagate the idea of an 'ungrateful' Moldova toward its 'Soviet liberators.' Any initiative for decommunization or decolonization is immediately labeled as 'historical revisionism' or 'revived fascism' in an effort to create moral panic and undermine social cohesion," concluded the historian.

The interview "Collective Memory – A Battlefield of Hybrid Warfare Against the Republic of Moldova" is part of the debate series "The Impact of the Past on Processes of Confidence-Building and Peace Consolidation." The project is supported by the German foundation Hanns Seidel.