|
|
|
Although it would seem that Ukraine has a greater unilateral need for the EU, in reality, the need is mutual. However, the war created a strong interdependence between the future of Ukraine and, respectively, the ability of the EU to become a more autonomous and resilient geopolitical actor...
|
Dionis Cenuşa, Senior Contributor |
|
The European Union and Russia have entered into an endurance race in terms of maintaining sanctions and taking advantage of energy asymmetries, respectively. Through sanctions, used as an economic weapon, European actors want to weaken Russia's economy, thus stopping the aggression against Ukraine. In addition, the EU's restrictions in the energy field have acquired an additional utility, namely that of reducing dependence on Russian hydrocarbons, which also implies a transition towards oil, coal and natural gas not imported directly from Russia. In reality, trade in the global economy is interdependent, and Russian energy exports may reach the European market in one form or another due to third countries that for now refuse to align with the sanctions regime (such as India).
Immediately after the outbreak of war, it could be anticipated that with the energy superiority at its disposal (IPN, May 2022), Russia would attempt to use natural gas supplies as a counter-sanction against the EU. Russia's actions in the energy field constitute an economic response, applied for the first time, against the EU. The latter did not know how to draw lessons from the negative experience of the states of the common neighborhood, now with a European perspective (Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine), which faced "gas wars" during the last 15 years. Currently, the reduction of gas supplies to the EU allows Moscow to aggravate the energy crisis at the European level. The general scarcity of energy resources, partly stimulated by the EU sanctions, feeds and perpetuates the spiral of price increases in the EU (9.6% annual inflation in June compared to 8.8% in May). The obvious objective of Russia is to discredit European sanctions in order to produce feelings of betrayal in Ukraine, similar to those observed on a micro-scale in the case of Canada and Germany's decision to return to Gazprom, contrary to technological sanctions, the Siemens turbine used for the Portovaya compressor station of Nord Stream 1 (NS1) pipeline.
If European unity on sanctions weakens and the US is engrossed in the fall election campaign, then Russia believes that it can bring about Ukraine's defeat by keeping the recently occupied Ukrainian territories (Kherson, Zaporizhzhia, Kharkiv and other parts of Luhansk and Donetsk). With unlimited access to domestically produced hydrocarbons, Russia sees the upcoming winter season as a strategic opportunity to dismantle sanctions, cause dissension within EU states and prolong the "war of attrition" against Ukraine.
EU sanctions - delayed effects?
Following the introduction of the seventh sanctions package (EU, July 2022), the EU is focused on preserving unity around the sanctions regime, without which Ukraine's efforts to defend and recapture the territories occupied by Russian military forces (about 20% of the Ukrainian territory) could be in danger. Maintaining and strengthening the sanctions becomes a complicated mission due to the growing tiredness that is registered among the population. According to the Eurobarometer (June 2022), 58% of those surveyed are not prepared to withstand the increase in energy prices as a result of the sanctions against Russia. The same phenomenon is observed in the case of food security (see Table 1 below). National surveys in countries such as Germany indicate a relatively negative perception of the effectiveness of sanctions. Thus, according to INSA, 47% of the population believe that the sanctions regime hits Germany harder than in Russia, 36% affirm that both sides are affected equally and only 12% are convinced that the impact is major on the Russian side (Bild, July 2022).
Table 1. Negative responses (“not very ready", “not at all ready”) about the consequences of sanctions
Rising energy prices
|
Rising food prices
|
EU – 58%
|
EU – 59 %
|
- (9 countries) Spain, Romania, Malta, Portugal, Croatia, Slovakia, Cyprus, Greece, Bulgaria – 71-91%
- (13 countries) Germany, Slovenia, Ireland, Latvia, Czech Republic, Poland, Estonia, Belgium, France, Lithuania, Austria, Italy, Hungary – 52-68%
- (5 countries) Denmark, Sweden, Netherlands, Finland, Luxembourg – 15-43%
|
- (9 countries) Spain, Romania, Malta, Portugal, Croatia, Slovakia, Cyprus, Greece, Bulgaria – 71-90%
- (13 countries) Germany, Slovenia, Ireland, Latvia, Czech Republic, Poland, Estonia, Belgium, France, Lithuania, Austria, Italy, Hungary – 54-68-%
- (5 countries) Denmark, Sweden, Netherlands, Finland, Luxembourg – 17-45%
|
Source: Author's compilation based on June 2022 Eurobarometer results.
While pro-Russian European actors such as Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban question the effectiveness of the sanctions, European politicians resort to aggressive public diplomacy to defend the sanctions. Among the most ardent defenders of the idea that the sanctions are working is the head of European diplomacy, Josep Borrell. In a recent post, he commented that "sanctions require strategic patience" to have their desired effect, presumably referring to Russia's abandonment of the war or failure to wage it. In fact, all sanctions have some effect, but they are not only intended to harm the Russian economy, but also to help Ukraine win the war. This goal, however, does not depend only on sanctions, but on how they have been combined with military assistance to Ukraine and the results that the Ukrainian side achieves on the battlefront.
The EU and overcoming the energy crisis
In the context of some political mobilization to keep sanctions intact, the EU is showing serious signs of concern about the ability of member states to overcome the energy crisis. Brussels is aware that disruptions caused by the energy crisis can have costly political and socio-economic effects, especially in the dead of winter. For this reason, faced with the manipulation of the gas market by Gazprom and the possibility of stopping deliveries, the EU proposed the application of the principles of diversification, solidarity and rationing (saving) to overcome energy limitations.
To diversify its gas import sources, the EU engages in aggressive energy diplomacy, sometimes ignoring the liberal agenda. This was clearly seen with the signing of the agreement with Azerbaijan to double exports to the EU by up to 20 billion m3 in 2027, through the Trans-Adriatic gas pipeline (Reuters, July 2022). The latter is part of the Southern Corridor that delivers gas from the Caspian region to Greece, from where it passes to Italy and Bulgaria. In 2021, the EU secured its internal gas consumption from pipeline imports from Russia (41%), Norway (24%) and Algeria (11%), around 10% of local production and up to 20% of liquefied gas. Therefore, in addition to intensifying energy diplomacy towards the Caspian Sea (Azerbaijan), the EU is committed to increasing imports of liquefied gas from the African continent, where gas is already being exported through gas pipelines from Algeria. In this sense, the European Commission would have started negotiations with Nigeria to increase supplies of liquefied gas, after holding similar talks with Qatar. At the same time, the main EU LNG importers, such as Spain, openly declare their intention to reduce imports from Russia, which have been increasing (11.9% in 2022 compared to 6.6% in the same period of 2021). Therefore, diversification and distancing of Russian gas are taking place both in relation to distribution by pipeline and by sea.
Table 2. LNG import in the EU, 2021
Import sources of LNG, %
|
Main EU importers of LNG, billion m3
|
USA – 28
Russia – 20
Qatar – 20
Nigeria – 14
Algeria – 11
|
Spain – 21.3
France – 18.3
Italy – 9.3
Netherlands – 8.7
Belgium – 6.5
|
Source: Europa.eu
On the side of solidarity and savings, the European Commission launched the idea of mandatory savings in natural gas consumption by 15% (Euronews, July 2022), opting for a lighter option after the refusal of Spain, Portugal and Greece (Politico, July 2022). The opposition to the idea of savings is due to the lack of transparency with which the Commission launched this initiative, which nevertheless corresponds to the state of emergency in the energy sector. On the one hand, the idea has not yet received the support of at least 12 member states (many of which have a public with a negative perception of the consequences of sanctions, as shown in Table 1 above). This creates obstacles in the adoption process that requires a qualified majority vote, provided by at least 15 member states representing 65% of the EU population. On the other hand, the assumption has crystallized that this initiative is determined by the Commission's desire to help Germany. It has not been able to accumulate enough gas volumes to get through the winter season (only about 65%), due to a lack of effective control of critical gas storage infrastructure and reduced deliveries through NS1, both caused by for Russia. Contrary to this idea, the President of the Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, suggested that at least 15 countries are in danger of possible gas cuts by Russia.
The EU understands that the energy collapse of an EU member state with serious political effects (anti-government protests and even government resignations and early elections), not only economic (up to 1.5% drop in economic indicators), can destroy the common position against the entire sanctions regime against Russia. More than that, an energy paralysis in Germany, Italy or France will cause shock waves in the other member states that depend on the markets of the European economic giants.
Russia's energy weapon - immediate effects?
Russia's calculations revolve around the need to survive the two-way impact of sanctions. On the one hand, the restrictions imposed by the EU and other Western allies are aimed at reducing the resources of the Vladimir Putin regime in order to exhaust Russian capabilities to wage war against Ukraine. During the approximately 5 months of the war, Russia would have spent approximately $200 million per day (a total of approximately $55 billion so far). Its international foreign exchange reserves are also shrinking sharply (in just one week in July, reserves fell by $7.5 billion to $527.7 billion, of which $300 billion is frozen under sanctions), and the ruble's strengthening against the dollar (with a 42%), compared to a few months ago, reduce revenue from the sale of expensive hydrocarbons. At the same time, Russia is putting itself in a position to ensure solutions to the political-economic isolation generated by European sanctions that is leading to technological degradation and the deindustrialization of the Russian economy. Added to this is the loss of access to Western production, services and markets and to investment, without which medium and long-term economic growth is compromised. These are partially offset by substitution with local production, parallel import from friendly states, and trade diversification.
On the other hand, Russia is using the EU's energy dependency, particularly on natural gas, to break up European unity. The increase in exports to Hungary (by 700 million m3), while Germany receives around 40% of the previous volumes through NS1, indicates that Russia would be interested in fueling the populist debates in the EU states about the Hungarian model of relations with Russian energy means. Data from previous polls show that there is fertile ground for favouring anti-sanctions discourse. Taking into account that at least until March 2023 (winter season 2022-23) the EU will need the cheapest possible energy resources, Russia will be able to consolidate its energy advantages. This also implies the possibility of continuing to obtain considerable income, identical to that accumulated in the first three months of the war from the sale of hydrocarbons (some 30 billion dollars per month).
Discontent over inflation and fears over lack of access to energy resources are two factors that can easily ignite feelings of frustration in European societies. Russia is banking on the fact that social unrest in EU states could put pressure on national governments, undermining cohesion around sanctions.
In lieu of conclusions…
It seems that Russia is fighting at least two "wars of attrition". One against Ukraine, by destroying the critical infrastructure that is essential for the functioning of the economy, but also the civil infrastructure, without which keeping the population in the country and dedicating it to economic activities becomes an unsustainable mission (30% of the population was put out of work in some 700 companies and moved the activity to the regions less affected by the war). As a result, Moscow seeks to disempower Ukraine militarily and economically, worsening conditions to the point where signing a truce would be perceived as a lesser evil.
The second "war of (energy) attrition" is waged against the EU, which is going through an unprecedented energy crisis. The consequences of the energy shortage already affect the economic productivity and the standard of living of the population, which could also experience energy shocks (temporary disconnections of the electricity supply, drop in temperature in residential spaces, etc.). These unfortunate experiences may lead to the decline of democratic institutions, political crises and increased support for Eurosceptic forces at the European level, some of which are openly pro-Russian. Under the most negative scenarios, anti-government protests are possible, with open demands for the suspension of sanctions against Russia and the reestablishment of dialogue to guarantee the supply of energy resources at affordable prices.
It is essential that both Ukraine and the EU resist the various pressures to which they are exposed. Otherwise, Russia will have a double victory: against Ukraine, but also against the EU. To avoid such an end, the EU needs solidarity both in sanctions and in the consumption of energy resources. The strategic patience of the EU must be connected with the strategic support to Ukraine, and the latter must be engaged in initiatives to strengthen European energy resilience. Although it would seem that Ukraine has a greater unilateral need for the EU, in reality, the need is mutual. However, the war created a strong interdependence between the future of Ukraine and the EU's ability to become a truly autonomous and resilient geopolitical actor.
Dionis Cenuşa, Senior Contributor
Dionis Cenușa is a political scientist, researcher at the Institute of Political Sciences at Liebig-Justus University in Giessen, Germany, MA degree in Interdisciplinary European Studies from the College of Europe in Warsaw.
Areas of research: European Neighborhood Policy, EU-Moldova relationship, EU's foreign policy and Russia, migration and energy security.
Follow Dionis Cenușa on
Twitter
IPN publishes in the Op-Ed rubric opinion pieces submitted by authors not affiliated with our editorial board. The opinions expressed in these articles do not necessarily coincide with the opinions of our editorial board.
Dionis Cenușa
See related articles:
- "Multi-vector" foreign policy and European integration: the realities of Serbia, Moldova and Georgia. Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Differentiated European accession: the imminent decoupling of Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia. Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- (Geo)political polarization in Georgia and Moldova and what is at stake for the EU and Russia. Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Prevalence of the geopolitical factor in the EU accession agenda of Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova. Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- The new EU defense agenda and the dynamics in Eastern Europe. Analysis of Dionis Cenușa
- Forecasts for Eastern Europe in 2024: The crisis of EU influence and the electoral renewal of autocracies. Analysis of Dionis Cenusa
- The Hungarian-Russian factor and the Ukrainian dimension of the EU's eastern enlargement. Analysis of Dionis Cenusa
- The Middle East crisis and the European perspective for Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia. Analysis of Dionis Cenusa
- The Transnistrian conflict settlement: three scenarios in the context of the geostrategic interests of Moldova, Ukraine and Russia. Analysis by Dionis Cenusa
- The Cyprus precedent, the post-Soviet “frozen conflicts” and the European agenda of Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia. Analysis by Dionis Cenusa
- The effects of the anti-government protests in Georgia and Moldova on the EU positions. Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Russia and the geopolitical costs of war: the "frozen conflicts" in Moldova and Azerbaijan. Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia on the road to the EU: 5 principles to make reforms more efficient. Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Bringing Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia closer to the EU: a multi-speed progress. Analysis by Dionis Cenusa
- Disinhibiting EU strategic thinking under the pressure of Russian militarist revisionism: breaking European "taboos". Analysis by Dionis Cenusa
- Preventing Russian-origin threats in 2023: three priorities for risk reduction for the West. Analysis by Dionis Cenusa
- "Reshaping" of regional critical infrastructure under the impact of war: the case of Ukraine, Russia and the EU. Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- The energy crisis in Moldova and support for reunification with Romania, analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Ukraine's critical infrastructure vs. Russia's energy positioning - the "war of nerves". Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- The parameters of Western aid to Ukraine and Moldova: preparation for the “Russian winter”. Analysis by Dionis Cenusa
- Russian Tactics against Ukraine and Moldova: Ramifications of the Energy Crises. Analysis of Dionis Cenușa
- Russian attacks on critical infrastructure: risks for Ukraine's resilience and implications for the EU. Analysis of Dionis Cenușa
- The new scenarios of Russian aggression in the light of the illegal annexation of southeastern Ukraine. Analysis of Dionis Cenusa
- Moldova-Russia relations: between anti-governmental protests and gas blackmail. Analysis by Dionis Cenusa
- Russia's gas war and the EU's resilience test: three Russian goals and three European dilemmas. Analysis by Dionis Cenusa
- The de-oligarchization of Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia: the EU condition for advancing the European perspective. Analysis by Dionis Cenuşa
- Georgia and Moldova: Comparative analysis of state resilience and risks of Russian origin. Analysis of Dionis Cenusa
- Moldova and the candidacy for the EU: between the loss of legitimacy and the need for a national dialogue. Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- EU membership candidacy: internal and geopolitical differences between Ukraine and Moldova. Analysis of Dionis Cenușa
- The race for EU membership status: the three scenarios for Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia. Analysis of Dionis Cenușa
- EU energy autonomy and "crisis" of sanctions against Russia: between blockades and new alternatives. Aanalysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Regional insecurity and the search for resilience for Moldova - based on EU or NATO assistance? Analysis by Dionis Cenusa
- New trends in aggression against Ukraine, Western sanctions and Russian energy weapon
- Moldova and Georgia's Dialogue with the EU and NATO: Seeking External Attention and Resources for State Resilience. Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- The "new" European agenda of Moldova, the unification with Romania and the separation of the Transnistria region. Analysis of Dionis Cenușa
- Sanctions against Russia to save Ukraine and the Chinese factor, analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- The Russian invasion and the "rivalry" of Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia for accession to the EU. Analysis of Dionis Cenușa
- Russian crisis 2.0: Ukraine's demands towards the West in the face of new scenarios in Moscow. Analysis of Dionis Cenușa
- The role of EU assistance in Moldova's detachment from Russia. Analysis of Dionis Cenușa
- Ukrainianization of European security: Why is Russia acting now? Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Top Seven Forecasts for the Eastern Partnership in 2022: Stress Test for Local Reforms and Pressure from Regional Geopolitical Competition. Analysis of Dionis Cenușa
- Top 5 advances and challenges in the EaP in 2021: pro-EU resilience and new sources of regional instability. Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Germany's post-Merkel foreign policy: more pro-European in Eastern Europe, tougher on Russia. Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Moldova's foreign policy - between "interconnection" with Romania and "balancing" with Russia. Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- The migration crisis in Belarus, the EU’s weaknesses and the scenarios of the Lukashenko regime. Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Drawing lessons from Moldova on EU energy security and the Russian monopoly. Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Russia's intentions to counter Western influence in the CIS space, analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Revitalizing the EU-Moldova dialogue: between geopolitical enthusiasm, “historical moment” and local limitations, analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Between EU expectations and the political reality in Georgia and Moldova: contradictions and risks, analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- The Post-Merkel Era and the Fate of Eastern Europeans: Continuation of European Integration and Restoration of Territorial Integrity, Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Resuscitation of Russia-Moldova relations and the impact of the European vector. Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Resolving territorial conflicts in the Eastern Partnership: In search of a personalized EU approach, analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Georgia-Moldova-Ukraine “Association” Triangle: Deepening EU Integration and the “Shield” Against Russian Influence, Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- EU Economic Sanctions and Vulnerability of the Eastern Partnership to Belarusian Precedent. Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Early Elections in Moldova and the Geopolitical Power of the Diaspora. Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Deepening differentiation within the Eastern Partnership and the emergence of the pan-European "Trio". Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Oligarchy in Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine: between withdrawal, regrouping and “re-education”. Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Public Attitudes in Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine towards the EU - between Adoration and Moderation. Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Adjusting the visa-free regime with the EU for Eastern Europeans - from the pandemic to the "green pass". Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- "Sputnik V" at the EU border and Russia's targets in Moldova, Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- The signs of “vaccine diplomacy” in Moldova: Romania's advantages over Russia. Analysis by Dionis Cenușă
- The EU’s calculus in Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova - navigating between political crises, reforms and the "shadows" of Russia. Analysis by Dionis Cenușă
- Anticipating Russia's reaction to future EU sanctions: division, disinformation or destabilization? Analysis by Dionis Cenușă
- EU-Russia relationship in 2021 - between "distorted pragmatism" and "resilient foreign policy", Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Re-Europeanization of Moldova's foreign policy and the EU's position on the Moldovan political crisis, Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Top eight forecasts for Eastern Partnership states in 2021 - between “contestation” and “renewal”. Analysis by Dionis Cenușă
- The Eastern Partnership's Top 5 Opportunities and Challenges in 2020, Analysis by Dionis Cenușă
- The EU, the "Magnitsky Act" and targeting autocrats in the Eastern neighborhood. Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Moldova-Russia relationship and the post-Dodon transition - between “rational” and “emotional” approaches, Analysis by Dionis Cenușă
- Informational resilience near the eastern borders of the EU, Analysis by Dionis Cenușă
- The EU's eastern neighborhood at a new crossroad - between electoral riddles and security crises, analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Moldova - presidential elections without a "geopolitical vote"? Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- The perspective of Russia, China and the EU on the political crisis in Belarus - between intervention, support and influence, analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- Belarus - a new "velvet revolution" in the Eastern Partnership? Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- The „darlings” of the EU conditionality mechanism - Georgia, Moldova or Ukraine? Analysis by Dionis Cenușa
- The effects of EU actions in Moldova - financial assistance and the opposition’s contradictions. Analysis
- Germany’s Presidency in the EU Council and the Eastern Partnership’s future: A Guide to handling an "uncomfortable" reality, analysis
- The EU's political agenda and the "moving sands" in Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia, analysis
- The EU's conditionality and fighting Euroscepticism in Eastern Partnership, Op-Ed
- The Eurasian Union and the health crisis: lacking integration and geopolitical ambitions, Op-Ed
- NATO’s solidarity and the Russian factor: the tough lesson of state resilience, Op-Ed
- China and Russia – the health diplomacy and the "fragmentation” of Europe, Op-Ed
- On the effects of the Pandemic – between European solidarity and the Eastern neighbourhood's resilience, Op-Ed
- The "falling governments" in Moldova and Ukraine: Four similarities and two differences, Op-Ed
- European integration in the EU's neighbourhood: With or without "de-geopoliticization”?, Op-Ed
- “Macronization” of EU-Russia ties and effects on Eastern neighborhood, Op-Ed
- Moldova-Romania unification, migration and European integration in the East, Op-Ed
- Immobilization of the oligarchs in Moldova, Georgia and Ukraine: mission (im)possible? Op-Ed
- Ten forecasts for 2020: “Geopolitization” of the oligarchy in Moldova and EU-Russia rapprochement, Op-Ed
- Year of "Shortened" Europtimism in Moldova: Top 3 Successes and Setbacks in 2019. Op-Ed
- Romania-Moldova dialogue: from “calm tone” to the conditionality regime, Op-Ed
- Traumatized European perspective in EU’s vicinity and the Moldovan echoes, Op-Ed
- EU-Moldova dialogue: Is there European integration after Maia Sandu’s government?, Op-Ed
- Enlargements "in between" the EU and the Eurasian Union: Serbia and Moldova as showcase, Op-Ed
- EU macro-financial aid for Moldova: objective rewarding or political stimulation?, OP-ED
- Russia, the EU and the restoring geopolitical coexistence along the Kiev-Chisinau-Tbilisi line, Op-Ed
- Moldova’s government of reform and the European "credit of trust"
- Moldova's "balanced" foreign policy, the Paris-Moscow axis and the Ukrainian dossier, Op-Ed
- Moldova’s fragile government and the European agenda by 2020, OP-ED
- Unlocking European Assistance for Moldova: with or without conditionality?, OP-ED
- "Anti-oligarchic spring" or temporary illusions in Moldova, Ukraine and Georgia, OP-ED
- Surrendering oligarchic regime, re-launching of European integration in Moldova and Russia’s agenda, OP-ED
- Moldova’s political crisis: Overcoming the geopolitical complex and the "captured state", OP-ED
- Political speeds in Moldova, Ukraine and Georgia: in search of a “virtuous circle”, OP-ED
- Intersection of geopolitical symbols in Moldova: between Soviet past and rights of sexual minorities, OP-ED
- Visa liberalization in Moldova after five years: weaknesses of good governance and comparisons to Ukraine and Georgia, OP-ED
- Post-electoral Moldova: between Russia’s warnings, absence of EU and snap elections, OP-ED
- (Geo)political behavior of Presidents of Moldova, Georgia and Ukraine: between fluctuating perceptions and realities, OP-ED
- Formation of post-electoral coalition in Moldova and Moscow’s benefits, OP-ED
- Diaspora’s power in the Moldovan Elections - Between Perceptions and Realities, OP-ED
- Attitudes of citizens of Moldova, Ukraine and Georgia towards EU and paradoxes of polls, OP-ED
- Ten forecasts for 2019: Reconfiguration of European agenda in Moldova and the rule of law crisis in EU, OP-ED
- Year of disruptions in Moldova’s European integration: Top 3 accomplishments and failures in 2018, OP-ED
- Deficiencies of European conditionality and survival of Moldova political class, OP-ED
- Warning about suspension of visa-free regime for Moldova and synergy of EU criticism, OP-ED
- Difficult coexistence between civil society and oligarchic regimes in Moldova and Georgia, OP-ED
- Failure to insert the European integration in Moldova’s Constitution: losers and winners
- Future of Association Agreements in Moldova, Ukraine and Georgia: local, European and Russian factors, OP-ED
- Opportunities of extraparliamentary opposition, fears of government and positioning towards EU, OP-ED
- Scanning of EU macro-financial assistance to Moldova, Ukraine and Georgia: frontrunners and laggards, OP-ED
- Decay of EU-Moldova relations until a new electoral test, OP-ED
- Antigovernment protests, government’s stratagems and European agenda of Moldova, OP-ED
- Discrepancies between Chisinau and EU and intention to make use of Russian factor, OP-ED
- Is Moldova’s case a dangerous precedent for EU’s relations with Ukraine and Georgia? OP-ED
- Impact of EP resolution: from political crisis of government to attack on EU’s image in Moldova, OP-ED
- Deterioration of EU-Moldova dialogue and calculations of Moldovan government, OP-ED
- Invalidation of elections in Chisinau, government scenarios and EU reaction, OP-ED
- Romanian Presidency of Council of EU and political-energy context in Moldova, OP-ED
- Social protests amid European integration: Why do citizens in Georgia protest more often than those in Moldova? OP-ED
- Impact of rapprochement between EU and Russia on Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova, OP-ED
- Foreign multi-vectorialism of President Dodon and post-electoral geopolitical uncertainties, OP-ED
- Moldova’s energy dependence, avoidance of transparency and ignoring of debt for Russian gas, OP-ED
- EU and limits of “strict conditionality” in relation to Moldova, OP-ED
- Role and implications of (Euro)unionism in Moldova, OP-ED
- Georgia’s European aspirations and lessons to be learned by Moldova, OP-ED
- Regeneration of Putin regime and implications for EaP and Moldova, OP-ED
- (Geo)political scenarios for parliamentary elections of Moldova, OP-ED
- Moldova and EU: a dialogue clogged up with old problems and new expectations, OP-ED
- Diagnosis of oligarchy in Moldova, Ukraine and Georgia and de-oligarchization solutions, OP-ED
- EU assistance for Moldova, hastening of reforms and government’s survival, OP-ED
- European integration, import of EU legislation and practical solutions for shaping benefits, OP-ED
- Moldova and position of EaP leader between forced reforms and advantage of regional comparison, OP-ED
- Moldova’s struggle against Russian misinformation: shortcomings and electoral calculation, OP-ED
- New visa suspension mechanism as an additional instrument targeting corruption in Moldova, Ukraine and Georgia, OP-ED
- Constitutional Court, European integration and (geo)political struggle in Moldova, OP-ED
- Bulgarian presidency of EU Council and effects on Moldova, OP-ED
- Ten predictions for 2018: Electoral test for the European course, resurgence of the pro-Russian forces, OP-ED
- Nature of growth of pro-European perception and attempt to “constitutionalize” European course, OP-ED
- Struggle against Russian propaganda in Moldova, touching of U.S. and European content, OP-ED
- Moldova and prospects of joining EU – lack of political, institutional and emotional readiness on both sides, OP-ED
- Future of EaP and Moldova following Brussels Declaration – between pragmatism and local realities, OP-ED
- What do Eastern Partnership and Moldova go with to Brussels summit? OP-ED
- Moderation of Euroskepticism of President Dodon, Moldova-EU trade and resuscitation of pro-European sympathies, OP-ED
- Legitimacy of governments of EaP, survival of European course and Moldova, OP-ED
- Multiple speeds of Eastern Partnership, civil society and Moldova’s case, OP-ED
- Russia, nationalism in Europe and Moldova, OP-ED
- European integration, pro-European unionism and defects of Moldovan government, OP-ED
- Pro-reform agenda instead of blocking of macro-financial assistance, OP-ED
- Mandate of new Head of EU Delegation to Moldova and first major challenge, OP-ED
- EU’s mission in Eastern neighborhood and Moldova: stimulation of development or European integration? OP-ED
- Magnetization of Eastern Partnership, Russia’s role and implications for Moldova, OP-ED
- Civil society: agents of influence or sanitarians of political system. OP-ED
- European integration in Moldova: elitist project or not?, OP-ED
- Moldova on 26th anniversary of independence: between sustainability and Europeanization, Op-Ed
- The end of Pirkka Tapiola’s tenure, the pro-Russian president and the pro-European oligarch, OP-ED
- Chisinau’s bet: Macro-financial assistance and EU recognition, Op-Ed
- Moldova and “stabilitocracy” in European neighborhood, OP-ED
- Re-evaluation of Moldova-EU Association Agreement: solution or new uncertainties? OP-ED
- EU’s reaction to introduction of mixed electoral system: pragmatism or weakness, OP-ED
- External financing of civil society, government pressure and European integration, OP-ED
- Stimulation of reforms in Moldova, Georgia and Ukraine: new conditionality vs European perspective
- Estonian presidency of EU Council and implications for Moldova
- Restoration of power supplies from Transnistrian region and weakness of European factor, Op-Ed
- Venice Commission, mixed-member electoral system and European assistance, OP-ED
- Role of President Dodon for Russia and implications for European integration, OP-ED
- Priorities of Eastern Partnership until 2020 and how Moldova can benefit from these, OP-ED
- European values versus traditional values and geopolitical subtext in Moldova, OP-ED
- European agenda, civil society and confrontation with government, OP-ED
- Three scenarios concerning fate of EU macro-financial assistance for Moldova, OP-ED
- Halt in EU funding versus uninominal voting system in Moldova, OP-ED
- How did Moldova become a ”captured state”? OP-ED
- Natural disasters in Moldova and opportunities of relationship with EU, OP-ED
- Moldova after three years of visa-free regime with EU and new European realities, OP-ED
- Can Memorandum with Eurasian Union diminish Moldova’s European agenda? OP-ED
- Hidden concerns of EU and adaptability of government, Op-Ed
- Moldova forced to combine CIS and Eurasian Union with European integration, OP-ED
- Pro-reform approach of EU and pro-Russian plans of President Dodon, OP-ED
- Multi-speed in EU and its neighborhood: Where is Moldova? OP-ED
- Pro-European sympathies and role of pro-EU opposition, OP-ED
- Presidential administration vs government: between political coexistence and geopolitical antagonism, OP-ED
- European security and Russia’s approach for a post-Western world, OP-ED
- Association Agreement with EU and paradoxes of President Dodon, OP-ED
- EU dilemma: to criticize government or to combat Euro-skeptical propaganda of pro-Russian President? OP-ED
- Parallel dialogues between EU and Moldova and Russian-Eurasian factor, OP-ED
- Is DCFTA implemented in Transnistrian region or not? OP-ED
- Populism and European integration in Moldova, Op-Ed
- Difficult mission: advancing of Europeanization and restoration of relations with Russia, OP-ED
- Eastern Partnership becomes more ‘practical’. What does Moldova gain? OP-ED
- About ‘application for accession’ to EU and Moldova’s homework, OP-ED IPN
- Energy interconnection with EU: Recipe for diminishing dependence on Transnistria and Russia
- Europeans’ tactic in relation to Chisinau: Reforms here and now, Op-Ed
- Georgia, liberalization of visas with EU and implications for Moldova
- Chisinau accelerates reforms to seduce European Union
- Europeans again in Chisinau: between dialogue with government and protest leaders
- Deciphering EU’s position on Moldova: Real significance versus mistakes and omissions
- Schengen crisis: Does it affect visa-free regime for Moldova or not?
- Western and Russian press about protests in Chisinau: between misinformation and manipulation
- Reactions of EU and U.S. to new anti-government protests in Chisinau
- Idea of early elections in Moldova: New pro-Europeans in Chisinau – “yes”, voices from Brussels - “better no”
- EU under Dutch presidency and allusions to Moldova
- EU in Moldova: recipe for reanimating European course in 2016