Official exchange rate for date 12.09.2020

Currency Code ABR Rate Exchange Rate
Albanian lek 008 ALL 10 1.5870
Armenian Dram 051 AMD 10 0.3398
Australian Dollar 036 AUD 1 12.0935
Azerbaijanian Manat 944 AZN 1 9.7900
Belarussian Ruble 933 BYN 1 6.3630
Bulgarian Lev 975 BGN 1 10.0668
Canadian Dollar 124 CAD 1 12.6406
Chinese yuan renminbi 156 CNY 1 2.4321
Croatian Kuna 191 HRK 1 2.6123
Czech Koruna 203 CZK 1 0.7410
Danish Krone 208 DKK 1 2.6463
Euro 978 EUR 1 19.6890
Georgian Lar 981 GEL 1 5.3628
Hong Kong dollar 344 HKD 1 2.1459
Hungarian Forint 348 HUF 100 5.5020
Iceland Krona 352 ISK 10 1.2028
Indian rupee 356 INR 10 2.2639
Japanese Yen 392 JPY 100 15.6773
Kazakhstan Tenge 398 KZT 10 0.3895
Kuwaiti Dinar 414 KWD 1 54.3720
Kyrgyzstan Som 417 KGS 10 2.1380
Macedonian denar 807 MKD 10 3.1963
Malaysian Ringgit 458 MYR 1 3.9945
New Zealand Dollar 554 NZD 1 11.1022
Norwegian Krone 578 NOK 1 1.8401
Polish Zloty 985 PLN 1 4.4220
Pound Sterling 826 GBP 1 21.6573
Romanian Leu 946 RON 1 4.0531
Russian Ruble 643 RUB 1 0.2212
Serbian Dinar 941 RSD 100 16.7441
Shekel Israelit 376 ILS 1 4.8655
South Korean won 410 KRW 100 1.4037
Special Drawing Rights 960 XDR 1 23.4998
Swedish Krona 752 SEK 1 1.9009
Swiss Franc 756 CHF 1 18.2983
Tajikistan Somoni 972 TJS 1 1.6108
Turkish Lira 949 TRY 1 2.2216
Turkmenistan Manat 934 TMT 1 4.7518
U.A.E. Dirham 784 AED 1 4.5280
US Dollar 840 USD 1 16.6313
Ukraine Hryvnia 980 UAH 1 0.5973
Uzbekistan Sum 860 UZS 100 0.1619


The National Association “COPYRIGHT” and the National Association of Phonogram Producers and Performers request the authorities to verify the legality of the reconciliation transaction concluded between AO “MORA”, the State Agency for Intellectual Property and the Ministry of Justice. The two associations claim that, as a result of this agreement, AGEPI unjustifiably changed its position on the approval of AO “MORA”, even though the reasons previously invoked for refusal would not have been removed. In their opinion, the situation could affect the rights of other collective management organizations and the functioning of the entire copyright and related rights administration system.

In a press conference at IPN, representatives of the two organizations announced that they have notified the Government, Parliament, and Presidency, requesting the examination of the circumstances under which the settlement transaction was concluded and the verification of the actions undertaken by AGEPI in the case of AO “MORA”.

The President of AN “COPYRIGHT”, Liviu Stirbu, reminded that on January 22, AGEPI refused to approve AO “MORA” as a collective management organization, invoking information presented by the National Anti-Corruption Center and the Information and Security Service. According to him, the institutions have signaled alleged links of the organization with a leader of collective management organizations from the Russian Federation, as well as the existence of security risks.

Liviu Stirbu stated that this information was neither withdrawn nor declared illegal, however, on July 21, the Ministry of Justice and AGEPI concluded a reconciliation transaction with AO “MORA”. Subsequently, on July 28, AGEPI revoked its refusal decision and ordered the resumption of the approval procedure.

“We believe that the situation created goes beyond the limits of a simple administrative dispute and requires a complete inter-institutional check, including from the perspective of legality, integrity of the decision-making process, and the economic and informational security of the state,” stated the president of “COPYRIGHT”.

The author Eugeniu Turuta stated that the reconciliation transaction does not only produce effects between the parties involved in the process, but it can influence the entire collective management system and the rights of already authorized organizations. In his opinion, the court and the authorities have not analyzed the impact of the agreement on the other organizations, nor have they explained the reasons for the change in AGEPI’s position.

“In administrative law, a fundamental principle operates: the public authority must justify its decisions. When it radically changes its position, this obligation is all the more important”, Eugeniu Turuta further stated.

The conference participants also addressed the issue of the delay in appointing the single collector of remuneration for copyright and related rights. They argue that, due to the blocking of the process, authors and performers did not receive their remuneration this year.

The interpreter Ian Raiburg mentioned that the artists did not earn “not a penny” in 2026 and proposed that the copyright field should be managed by the Ministry of Culture, not by AGEPI.

In the same context, the composer Oleg Baraliuc stated that the absence of a designated single collector generates significant financial losses for the rights holders and asked for explanations regarding the delay of the procedure.

At the same time, the speakers announced that they intend to launch a signature collection campaign for the dismissal of AGEPI’s leadership and for the transfer of the copyright domain under the subordination of the Ministry of Culture.

When asked by IPN for a reaction, the Ministry of Justice redirected the request to AGEPI, which stated that it will provide a response later. The representatives of AO “MORA” have not yet responded to the request for comments.

Note: IPN Agency offers the right of reply to those who consider themselves targeted in the news made from the statements of the organizers of this press conference, including by facilitating the organization of another press conference under similar conditions.


0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail


Official exchange rate for date 12.09.2020

Currency Code ABR Rate Exchange Rate
Albanian lek 008 ALL 10 1.5870
Armenian Dram 051 AMD 10 0.3398
Australian Dollar 036 AUD 1 12.0935
Azerbaijanian Manat 944 AZN 1 9.7900
Belarussian Ruble 933 BYN 1 6.3630
Bulgarian Lev 975 BGN 1 10.0668
Canadian Dollar 124 CAD 1 12.6406
Chinese yuan renminbi 156 CNY 1 2.4321
Croatian Kuna 191 HRK 1 2.6123
Czech Koruna 203 CZK 1 0.7410
Danish Krone 208 DKK 1 2.6463
Euro 978 EUR 1 19.6890
Georgian Lar 981 GEL 1 5.3628
Hong Kong dollar 344 HKD 1 2.1459
Hungarian Forint 348 HUF 100 5.5020
Iceland Krona 352 ISK 10 1.2028
Indian rupee 356 INR 10 2.2639
Japanese Yen 392 JPY 100 15.6773
Kazakhstan Tenge 398 KZT 10 0.3895
Kuwaiti Dinar 414 KWD 1 54.3720
Kyrgyzstan Som 417 KGS 10 2.1380
Macedonian denar 807 MKD 10 3.1963
Malaysian Ringgit 458 MYR 1 3.9945
New Zealand Dollar 554 NZD 1 11.1022
Norwegian Krone 578 NOK 1 1.8401
Polish Zloty 985 PLN 1 4.4220
Pound Sterling 826 GBP 1 21.6573
Romanian Leu 946 RON 1 4.0531
Russian Ruble 643 RUB 1 0.2212
Serbian Dinar 941 RSD 100 16.7441
Shekel Israelit 376 ILS 1 4.8655
South Korean won 410 KRW 100 1.4037
Special Drawing Rights 960 XDR 1 23.4998
Swedish Krona 752 SEK 1 1.9009
Swiss Franc 756 CHF 1 18.2983
Tajikistan Somoni 972 TJS 1 1.6108
Turkish Lira 949 TRY 1 2.2216
Turkmenistan Manat 934 TMT 1 4.7518
U.A.E. Dirham 784 AED 1 4.5280
US Dollar 840 USD 1 16.6313
Ukraine Hryvnia 980 UAH 1 0.5973
Uzbekistan Sum 860 UZS 100 0.1619

The interim president of the Orhei Court, Veronica Cupcea, has undergone an external evaluation, after the Superior Council of Magistracy rejected the reevaluation report of the Vetting Commission. The SCM found that, following the recalculation of the financial situation, there is no longer any reason to maintain the decision not to promote the evaluation, reports IPN.

According to SCM, the recalculation of financial flows for the year 2020 indicated a positive balance of 19,260 lei, eliminating findings of unjustified wealth for this period. However, previous findings for the years 2013 and 2014, with a negative financial difference of 221,187 lei, remain valid.

The Council mentioned that the total value of unexplained wealth for the entire period checked is below the threshold provided by law and cannot constitute a reason for finding a lack of financial integrity.

Consequently, the SCM rejected the reassessment report of the vetting Commission and noted the promotion of external evaluation by Veronica Cupcea.

0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail




1 IANUARIE, 2025
1 IANUARIE, 2025