The request by which the Shor Party asked to determine the constitutionality of the Parliament decision on the extension of the state of emergency was rejected as inadmissible by the Constitutional Court, IPN reports.
Application author, MP Marina Tauber argued the lawmakers didn’t explain the necessity of extending the state of emergency and didn’t specify the urgent measures that can be adopted by the Commission for Exceptional Situations. According to her, when extending the state of emergency, Parliament accepted the Government’s proposal without formulating any objection or analyzing the measures that need to be taken, allowing the Commission to decide by itself. This enabled the Commission to take measures that have nothing to do with the running out of the state of emergency.
The Constitutional Court noted that there was a parity of votes when dealing with the application. The examination of the constitutionality of the Parliament decision on the extension of the state of emergency of Dec member 1, 2022 was stopped, in accordance with the Constitutional Jurisdiction Code. The Court’s decision is final, cannot be challenged, takes effect when it is adopted and is published in the Official Gazette.
